World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 59 352 325 128 109 182 11406

Pamela L. Ruegg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pamela L. Ruegg between 1988 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pamela L. Ruegg published across 34 years, from 1988 to 2021, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 13 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications
1988 2021

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pamela L. Ruegg: publications per year, 1988 to 2021
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 6
2003 8
2004 7
2005 13
2006 11
2007 6
2008 6
2009 14
2010 1
2011 10
2012 6
2013 12
2014 6
2015 6
2016 8
2017 16
2018 7
2019 5
2020 6
2021 7
Total 180
Download as CSV

Pamela L. Ruegg publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela L. Ruegg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 179–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 182 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50 182
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Pamela L. Ruegg D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela L. Ruegg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33 59
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - DeLaval Dairy Extension Award, American Dairy Science Association

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Bacteria
  • Internal medicine
  • Antibiotics

Her primary areas of study are Mastitis, Herd, Veterinary medicine, Dairy cattle and Antimicrobial. Pamela L. Ruegg interconnects Antibiotics, Ceftiofur, Staphylococcus aureus and Somatic cell count in the investigation of issues within Mastitis. Her research integrates issues of Milking, Biotechnology, Disease, Subclinical mastitis and Bacteriological Cure in her study of Herd.

Her study in Veterinary medicine is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Biosecurity and Animal feed. Pamela L. Ruegg has researched Dairy cattle in several fields, including Bulk tank and Lactation. Her studies in Antimicrobial integrate themes in fields like Penicillin and Dairy herds.

Her most cited work include:

  • Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. (246 citations)
  • Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. (198 citations)
  • Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. (186 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Pamela L. Ruegg spends much of her time researching Mastitis, Veterinary medicine, Herd, Animal science and Somatic cell count. Her work deals with themes such as Internal medicine, Subclinical infection and Lactation, which intersect with Mastitis. Her study focuses on the intersection of Veterinary medicine and fields such as Antimicrobial with connections in the field of Antibiotic resistance and Ceftiofur.

In the subject of general Herd, her work in Bulk tank and Dairy herds is often linked to Management practices, thereby combining diverse domains of study. When carried out as part of a general Animal science research project, her work on Milking is frequently linked to work in Grazing, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. Her Somatic cell count study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Culling, Incidence and Brown Swiss.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Mastitis (48.94%)
  • Veterinary medicine (40.43%)
  • Herd (35.46%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2013-2020)?

  • Mastitis (48.94%)
  • Veterinary medicine (40.43%)
  • Somatic cell count (27.66%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her main research concerns Mastitis, Veterinary medicine, Somatic cell count, Herd and Milking. Her Mastitis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Internal medicine, Subclinical infection, Ceftiofur and Intensive care medicine. Her Veterinary medicine study incorporates themes from Udder, Total bacterial count, Bacterial counts and Intramammary infection.

Her Somatic cell count study combines topics in areas such as Rennet, Casein, Animal science and Brown Swiss. Her Herd research includes elements of Logistic regression, Biotechnology and Hygiene. The study incorporates disciplines such as Conditional logistic regression and Dentistry in addition to Milking.

Between 2013 and 2020, her most popular works were:

  • A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. (143 citations)
  • Treatments of clinical mastitis occurring in cows on 51 large dairy herds in Wisconsin. (63 citations)
  • The effect of storage temperature and duration on the microbial quality of bulk tank milk. (34 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Bacteria
  • Internal medicine
  • Antibiotics

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Mastitis, Veterinary medicine, Herd, Milking and Pirlimycin. Pamela L. Ruegg is interested in Subclinical mastitis, which is a branch of Mastitis. Her Veterinary medicine research includes themes of Bacterial counts and Hetacillin.

Her Herd study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Gastroenterology, Pregnancy and Subclinical infection. The Milking study combines topics in areas such as Conditional logistic regression, Dentistry and Infection control. Her Pirlimycin research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Streptococcus uberis, Ceftiofur and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Best Publications

  • A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention.

    Pamela L. Ruegg

  • Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis.

    D.A. Schreiner;P.L. Ruegg

  • Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin.

    M. Pol;P.L. Ruegg

  • Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001.

    J.A. Makovec;P.L. Ruegg

  • The selective treatment of clinical mastitis based on on-farm culture results: I. Effects on antibiotic use, milk withholding time, and short-term clinical and bacteriological outcomes.

    A. Lago;S.M. Godden;R. Bey;P.L. Ruegg

  • Management practices and reported antimicrobial usage on conventional and organic dairy farms.

    A.G. Zwald;P.L. Ruegg;J.B. Kaneene;L.D. Warnick

  • Body condition scores of Holstein cows on Prince Edward Island, Canada: relationships with yield, reproductive performance, and disease.

    P.L. Ruegg;R.L. Milton

  • Characterization of clinical mastitis occurring in cows on 50 large dairy herds in Wisconsin

    L. Oliveira;C. Hulland;P.L. Ruegg

  • Investigation of mastitis problems on farms

    Pamela L Ruegg

  • Risk factors associated with short-term post-treatment outcomes of clinical mastitis

    C. Pinzón-Sánchez;P.L. Ruegg

  • Relationship between antimicrobial drug usage and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive mastitis pathogens.

    M. Pol;P.L. Ruegg

  • Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from dairy cow milk samples submitted for bacterial culture: 8,905 samples (1994-2001).

    Jill A. Makovec;Pamela L. Ruegg

  • Opinions and practices of wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal well-being.

    F.G.H. Hoe;P.L. Ruegg

  • Risk factors for twinning in dairy cows

    M.L. Kinsel;W.E. Marsh;P.L. Ruegg;W.G. Etherington

  • Milk quality and mastitis tests

    Pamela L. Ruegg;Douglas J. Reinemann

  • Practical Food Safety Interventions for Dairy Production

    P.L. Ruegg

  • Herd-level factors associated with isolation of Salmonella in a multi-state study of conventional and organic dairy farms I. Salmonella shedding in cows.

    C. P. Fossler;S. J. Wells;J. B. Kaneene;P. L. Ruegg

  • Effects of Tail Docking on Milk Quality and Cow Cleanliness

    D.A. Schreiner;P.L. Ruegg

  • Treatments of clinical mastitis occurring in cows on 51 large dairy herds in Wisconsin.

    L. Oliveira;P.L. Ruegg

  • Management of mastitis on organic and conventional dairy farms

    P. L. Ruegg

  • Associations among milk quality indicators in raw bulk milk.

    J.C.F. Pantoja;D.J. Reinemann;P.L. Ruegg

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott J. Wells
Scott J. Wells University of Minnesota
John B. Kaneene
John B. Kaneene Michigan State University
Lorin D. Warnick
Lorin D. Warnick Cornell University
Ynte H. Schukken
Ynte H. Schukken Wageningen University & Research
Sandra M Godden
Sandra M Godden University of Minnesota
Ken E. Leslie
Ken E. Leslie University of Guelph
Jeff B. Bender
Jeff B. Bender University of Minnesota
Yrjö T. Gröhn
Yrjö T. Gröhn Cornell University
Matteo Gianesella
Matteo Gianesella University of Padua
Maddalena Zucali
Maddalena Zucali University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science or Veterinary studies opens doors to various related fields focusing on health, science, and behavior. Many students explore online options to supplement their knowledge or pivot their career path. For instance, an online degree in exercise science offers insights into animal and human physical health, which complements veterinary expertise.

In addition, those interested in behavior analysis may consider programs like the best schools for bcba, which provide strong backgrounds in behavioral science applicable to animal training and therapy settings.

For individuals keen on psychological aspects, exploring nasp accredited school psychology programs can offer relevant knowledge in developmental and mental health support, which is increasingly important in veterinary care involving emotional wellbeing.

Lastly, pursuing advanced credentials such as online apa accredited psyd programs with no gre requirements allows professionals to deepen their clinical practice, valuable for both human and animal clients in therapeutic contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela L. Ruegg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles