World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Veronika Schöpf

Veronika Schöpf

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8547 7897 52 51 113 6058

Veronika Schöpf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Veronika Schöpf between 2007 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Veronika Schöpf published across 18 years, from 2007 to 2024, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 1 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2007 2024

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Veronika Schöpf: publications per year, 2007 to 2024
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 5
2009 10
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 13
2014 9
2015 14
2016 6
2017 11
2018 11
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 3
2023 0
2024 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

Veronika Schöpf publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veronika Schöpf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 113 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 113
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Veronika Schöpf D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veronika Schöpf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Veronika Schöpf is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria. Their research spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a specific focus on sensory systems, biomedical engineering, physiology, nutrition and dietetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Their work explores various aspects of olfactory and sensory function, advanced chemical sensor technologies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, functional brain connectivity, as well as topics related to cancer, stress, anesthesia, immune response, nutrition, aging, and dysphagia assessment and management.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Schöpf include Florian Ph. S. Fischmeister, Valentina Parma, Kathrin Ohla, Maria G. Veldhuizen, and Masha Y. Niv. These collaborations have resulted in numerous publications within several respected scientific venues.

The main publication venues where Schöpf's research has appeared are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Chemical Senses
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

Recent papers include:

  • "More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis" (2020), published in Chemical Senses
  • "Sarcopenia in Neurological Patients: Standard Values for Temporal Muscle Thickness and Muscle Strength Evaluation" (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Human body odor increases familiarity for faces during encoding-retrieval task" (2020), published in Human Brain Mapping
  • "More than smell - COVID-19 is associated with severe impairment of smell, taste, and chemesthesis" (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "An fMRI study of cognitive remediation in drug-naïve subjects diagnosed with first episode schizophrenia" (2021), published in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

The research topics covered by Schöpf include:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management

Best Publications

  • Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa.

    Olga Pollatos;Anne-Lene Kurz;Jessica Albrecht;Tatjana Schreder

  • The microbiome of the upper respiratory tract in health and disease

    Christina Kumpitsch;Kaisa Koskinen;Veronika Schöpf;Christine Moissl-Eichinger

  • Anosmia-A Clinical Review.

    Sanne Boesveldt;Elbrich M Postma;Duncan Boak;Antje Welge-Luessen

  • Probiotics drive gut microbiome triggering emotional brain signatures

    Deepika Bagga;Johanna Louise Reichert;Karl Koschutnig;Christoph Stefan Aigner

  • Fetal functional imaging portrays heterogeneous development of emerging human brain networks

    András Jakab;Ernst Schwartz;Gregor Kasprian;Gerlinde M. Gruber

  • Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss.

    K. Kollndorfer;F.Ph.S. Fischmeister;K. Kowalczyk;E. Hoche

  • Watching the fetal brain at 'rest'.

    V. Schöpf;G. Kasprian;P.C. Brugger;D. Prayer

  • Smelling chemosensory signals of males in anxious versus nonanxious condition increases state anxiety of female subjects.

    Jessica Albrecht;Maria Demmel;Veronika Schöpf;Anna Maria Kleemann

  • Orbitofrontal volume reductions during emotion recognition in patients with major depression.

    Johanna Scheuerecker;Eva M. Meisenzahl;Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Martin Roesner

  • Recovery of olfactory function induces neuroplasticity effects in patients with smell loss.

    Kathrin Kollndorfer;Ksenia Kowalczyk;Elisabeth Hoche;Christian A. Mueller

  • Survival prediction using temporal muscle thickness measurements on cranial magnetic resonance images in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases

    Julia Furtner;Anna S. Berghoff;Omar M. Albtoush;Ramona Woitek

  • Influence of 4-week multi strain probiotic administration on resting-state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers

    Deepika Bagga;Christoph Stefan Aigner;Johanna Louise Reichert;Cinzia Cecchetto

  • Dose reduction in dynamic perfusion CT of the brain: effects of the scan frequency on measurements of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and mean transit time.

    Martin Wiesmann;Scott Berg;G. Bohner;R. Klingebiel

  • Sarcopenia in Neurological Patients: Standard Values for Temporal Muscle Thickness and Muscle Strength Evaluation

    Ariane Steindl;Johannes Leitner;Matthias Schwarz;Karl-Heinz Nenning

  • High correlation of temporal muscle thickness with lumbar skeletal muscle cross-sectional area in patients with brain metastases.

    Johannes Leitner;Sebastian Pelster;Veronika Schöpf;Anna S Berghoff

  • Trigeminal perception is necessary to localize odors.

    A.M. Kleemann;J. Albrecht;V. Schöpf;K. Haegler

  • The nasal microbiome mirrors and potentially shapes olfactory function

    Kaisa Koskinen;Johanna L. Reichert;Stefan Hoier;Jochen Schachenreiter

  • Assessing prenatal white matter connectivity in commissural agenesis

    Gregor Kasprian;Peter C. Brugger;Veronika Schöpf;Christian Mitter

  • Temporal muscle thickness is an independent prognostic marker in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

    Julia Furtner;Anna S Berghoff;Veronika Schöpf;Robert Reumann

  • Fully exploratory network ICA (FENICA) on resting-state fMRI data.

    V. Schöpf;C.H. Kasess;R. Lanzenberger;F. Fischmeister

  • Disrupted developmental organization of the structural connectome in fetuses with corpus callosum agenesis

    András Jakab;Gregor Kasprian;Ernst Schwartz;Gerlinde Maria Gruber

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Langs
Georg Langs Medical University of Vienna
Ewald Moser
Ewald Moser Medical University of Vienna
Matthias Preusser
Matthias Preusser Medical University of Vienna
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Christian Windischberger
Christian Windischberger Medical University of Vienna
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Siegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig Medical University of Vienna
Rupert Lanzenberger
Rupert Lanzenberger Medical University of Vienna
Karl Koschutnig
Karl Koschutnig University of Graz
Birgit Derntl
Birgit Derntl University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA can open doors to various interdisciplinary fields that combine scientific research with the practical study of the brain and behavior. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider pathways in psychology, counseling, or therapy as complementary or alternative careers.

Those seeking flexible and affordable routes to a professional role may want to review online mental health counseling programs, which prepare graduates for licensure and offer in-depth exposure to mental health issues. Similarly, online mental health degree programs can provide foundational skills for various support roles or advanced studies.

If you are passionate about family dynamics and helping relationships thrive, pursuing mft masters programs online is a flexible way to specialize in marriage and family therapy. For those looking to broaden their expertise in human behavior, consider pursuing an masters in psychology online cheap, which can help lay the groundwork for research, clinical, or applied psychology roles.

Best Scientists Citing Veronika Schöpf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles