World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9343 8987 2622 2419 131 6467

Jan P. H. van Santen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan P. H. van Santen between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan P. H. van Santen published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1997. 4 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1997. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1978 2021

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan P. H. van Santen: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 4
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 4
1993 4
1994 5
1995 1
1996 3
1997 11
1998 7
1999 5
2000 7
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 7
2007 7
2008 1
2009 6
2010 8
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 7
2016 4
2017 7
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
Total 147
Download as CSV

Jan P. H. van Santen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan P. H. van Santen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386 131
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan P. H. van Santen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan P. H. van Santen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan P. H. van Santen is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focused on Computer Science, Psychology, and Mathematics. Within these broad areas, their research is concentrated on specific subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The primary topics addressed in their research include Language Development and Disorders, Text Readability and Simplification, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Topic Modeling, Advanced Causal Inference Techniques, Statistical Methods and Inference, and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference.

The scientist has contributed to several publications, including the following recent papers:

  • A Pseudo-Value Approach to Analyze the Semantic Similarity of the Speech of Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2021, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Automated Scoring of Tablet-Administered Expressive Language Tests, 2021, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Group-matching algorithms for subjects and items, 2021, published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors comprise:

  • Jill K. Dolata
  • Joel Adams
  • Alexandra C. Salem
  • Heather MacFarlane
  • Rosemary Ingham

Jan P. H. van Santen has regularly published in venues such as Frontiers in Psychology and arXiv (Cornell University), with two papers appearing in the former and one in the latter.

Best Publications

  • Elaborated Reichardt detectors

    Jan P. H. van Santen;George Sperling

  • Temporal covariance model of human motion perception

    Jan P. H. van Santen;George Sperling

  • Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish

    Pilar Prieto;Jan van Santen;Julia Hirschberg

  • Assignment of segmental duration in text-to-speech synthesis

    Jan P.H. van Santen

  • Progress in speech synthesis

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Joseph P. Olive;Richard W. Sproat;Julia Hirschberg

  • Contextual effects on vowel duration

    Unknown

  • Improving the intelligibility of dysarthric speech

    Alexander B. Kain;John-Paul Hosom;Xiaochuan Niu;Jan P. H. van Santen

  • Methods for optimal text selection.

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Adam L. Buchsbaum

  • Segmental effects on timing and height of pitch contours.

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Julia Hirschberg

  • How many parameters can a model have and still be testable

    Donald Bamber;Jan P.H. van Santen

  • Review of Handbook of standards and resources for spoken language systems by Dafydd Gibbon, Roger Moore, and Richard Winski. Mouton de Gruyter 1997.

    Jan P. H. van Santen

  • Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication☆

    R.J.J.H. van Son;Jan P.H. van Santen

  • How to assess a model's testability and identifiability

    Donald Bamber;Jan P. H. van Santen

  • Perceptual experiments for diagnostic testing of text-to-speech systems

    Jan P.H. van Santen

  • Prosodic modelling in text-to-speech synthesis.

    Jan P. H. van Santen

  • A Quantitative Model of Fo Generation and Alignment

    Jan P. H. Van Santen;Bernd MÖbius

  • Automatic Speech Segmentation for Concatenative Inventory Selection

    Andrej Ljolje;Julia Hirschberg;Jan P. H. van Santen

  • The analysis of contextual effects on segmental duration

    Jan P.H. van Santen;Joseph P. Olive

  • Including dynamic and phonetic information in voice conversion systems

    Antonio Bonafonte;Alexander Kain;Jan P. H. van Santen;Helenca Duxans

  • High-accuracy automatic segmentation.

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Richard Sproat

  • Suprasegmental and segmental timing models in Mandarin Chinese and American English.

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Jan P. H. van Santen;Chilin Shih

  • Automated assessment of prosody production

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Emily Tucker Prud'hommeaux;Lois M. Black

  • Estimating phrase curves in the general superpositional intonation model.

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Taniya Mishra;Esther Klabbers

  • Improving ASR Systems for Children with Autism and Language Impairment Using Domain-Focused DNN Transfer Techniques.

    Robert Gale;Liu Chen;Jill Dolata;Jan P. H. van Santen

  • System and method for compressing concatenative acoustic inventories for speech synthesis

    Jan P. H. van Santen;Alexander Kain

  • Rapid serial presentation communication systems and methods

    Deniz Erdogmus;Brian Roark;Melanie Fried-Oken;Jan Van Santen

  • System and method for concatenating acoustic contours for speech synthesis

    Jan van Santen

  • Three theories of stroboscopic motion detection.

    Jan P.H. Van Santen;Peter J. Burt;George Sperling

  • Timing in text-to-speech systems.

    Jan P. H. van Santen

  • Effects of postvocalic voicing on the time course of vowels and diphthongs

    Jan P. H. van Santen;John S. Coleman;Mark A. Randolph

  • THE BELL LABS GERMAN TEXT-TO-SPEECH SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW

    Bernd Möbius;Richard Sproat;Jan P. H. van Santen;Joseph P. Olive

  • Diagnostic perceptual experiments for text-to-speech system evaluation.

    Jan P. H. van Santen

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Sproat
Richard Sproat Google (United States)
Julia Hirschberg
Julia Hirschberg Columbia University
Brian Roark
Brian Roark Google (United States)
George Sperling
George Sperling University of California, Irvine
Deniz Erdogmus
Deniz Erdogmus Northeastern University
Eric Fombonne
Eric Fombonne Oregon Health & Science University
Pilar Prieto
Pilar Prieto Pompeu Fabra University
Rhea Paul
Rhea Paul Sacred Heart University
Joel T. Nigg
Joel T. Nigg Oregon Health & Science University
Mark A. Clements
Mark A. Clements Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students in the USA often seek flexible online programs that advance their skills and open doors to diverse career options. Alongside traditional engineering degrees, several online pathways can be valuable for professionals hoping to broaden their expertise, leadership, or administrative abilities.

For those interested in combining technical knowledge with business acumen, 18 month mba programs offer a fast-track approach to management roles. These programs are designed for ambitious professionals who want to earn an MBA efficiently without compromising on the quality of education.

Individuals aiming for career stability and foundational business skills can also explore best bookkeeping certification or an office administration associate's degree. Both are widely respected credentials that complement technical backgrounds, especially for those seeking office management or financial roles.

Additionally, careers in legal support are accessible through paralegal online programs, offering a unique blend of analytical and organizational skills highly valued across industries. These diverse online degrees make it easier than ever for engineering and technology students in the USA to build dynamic, rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jan P. H. van Santen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles