World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10946 10243 255 250 116 4049

Lorenzo Pia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lorenzo Pia between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lorenzo Pia published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 14 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lorenzo Pia: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 9
2005 5
2006 5
2007 2
2008 9
2009 2
2010 4
2011 0
2012 6
2013 8
2014 10
2015 11
2016 10
2017 11
2018 8
2019 9
2020 6
2021 6
2022 3
2023 10
2024 9
2025 5
Total 148
Download as CSV

Lorenzo Pia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Pia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 116
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lorenzo Pia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Pia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lorenzo Pia is a researcher affiliated with the University of Turin in Italy focusing primarily on psychology and neuroscience. Their work encompasses a broad range of studies in cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, human-computer interaction, psychiatry and mental health, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research topics notably include:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions

Lorenzo Pia has published extensively in a number of scientific outlets. The most frequent venues for their publications are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain Sciences

The recent papers showcase the diversity of their focus and contribution to the scientific community. Some of these works include:

  • "Visual appearance of the virtual hand affects embodiment in the virtual hand illusion," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Virtual reality rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of immersive, semi-immersive and non-immersive techniques," 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Conversational Therapy through Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality Environments for Language Recovery and Psychological Well-Being in Post Stroke Aphasia," 2020, Behavioural Neurology
  • "I'm a believer: Illusory self-generated touch elicits sensory attenuation and somatosensory evoked potentials similar to the real self-touch," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Full body illusion and cognition: A systematic review of the literature," 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Lorenzo Pia's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Maria Pyasik
  • Tommaso Ciorli
  • Francesca Garbarini
  • Olga Dal Monte
  • Dalila Burin

Lorenzo Pia's research spans multiple interconnected domains, focusing on how sensory experiences, particularly those facilitated by virtual reality, relate to cognitive and psychological processes. Their interest in multisensory perception and the neural mechanisms underpinning sensory and motor functions aligns with contemporary trends in experimental psychology and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Shared Cortical Anatomy for Motor Awareness and Motor Control

    A. Berti;G. Bottini;M. Gandola;L. Pia

  • Understanding Intentions in Social Interaction: The Role of the Anterior Paracingulate Cortex

    Henrik Walter;Mauro Adenzato;Angela Ciaramidaro;Ivan Enrici

  • The intentional network: how the brain reads varieties of intentions.

    A. Ciaramidaro;A. Ciaramidaro;M. Adenzato;I. Enrici;S. Erk

  • The anatomy of anosognosia for hemiplegia: a meta-analysis.

    Lorenzo Pia;Marco Neppi-Modona;Raffaella Ricci;Anna Berti

  • Understanding Motor Awareness Through Normal and Pathological Behavior

    Anna Berti;Lorenzo Pia

  • 'Moving' a paralysed hand: bimanual coupling effect in patients with anosognosia for hemiplegia

    Francesca Garbarini;Marco Rabuffetti;Alessandro Piedimonte;Lorenzo Pia

  • When your arm becomes mine: Pathological embodiment of alien limbs using tools modulates own body representation ☆

    Francesca Garbarini;Carlotta Fossataro;Anna Berti;Patrizia Gindri

  • Are Movements Necessary for the Sense of Body Ownership? Evidence from the Rubber Hand Illusion in Pure Hemiplegic Patients

    Dalila Burin;Alessandro Livelli;Francesca Garbarini;Carlotta Fossataro

  • Modular structure of awareness for sensorimotor disorders: evidence from anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianaesthesia.

    Lucia Spinazzola;Lorenzo Pia;Alessia Folegatti;Clelia Marchetti

  • Embodiment of an alien hand interferes with intact-hand movements

    Francesca Garbarini;Lorenzo Pia;Alessandro Piedimonte;Marco Rabuffetti

  • Unawareness in schizophrenia: neuropsychological and neuroanatomical findings.

    Lorenzo Pia;Marco Tamietto

  • Body ownership increases the interference between observed and executed movements.

    Dalila Burin;Konstantina Kilteni;Marco Rabuffetti;Mel Slater;Mel Slater

  • Motor awareness and motor intention in anosognosia for hemiplegia

    Annamaria Berti;L Spinazzola;Lorenzo Pia;M. Rabuffetti

  • Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke.

    Lorenzo Pia;Luca Latini Corazzini;Alessia Folegatti;Patrizia Gindri

  • Visual appearance of the virtual hand affects embodiment in the virtual hand illusion.

    Maria Pyasik;Gaetano Tieri;Lorenzo Pia

  • Movements and body ownership: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion after mechanical limb immobilization

    Dalila Burin;Francesca Garbarini;Valentina Bruno;Carlotta Fossataro

  • On the relation between body ownership and sense of agency: A link at the level of sensory-related signals.

    Maria Pyasik;Dalila Burin;Lorenzo Pia

  • That's my hand! Therefore, that's my willed action: How body ownership acts upon conscious awareness of willed actions.

    Dalila Burin;Maria Pyasik;Adriana Salatino;Lorenzo Pia

  • Embodiment of others' hands elicits arousal responses similar to one's own hands.

    Francesca Garbarini;Luca Fornia;Carlotta Fossataro;Lorenzo Pia

  • Abnormal Sense of Agency in Patients with Schizophrenia: Evidence from Bimanual Coupling Paradigm

    Francesca Garbarini;Angela Mastropasqua;Monica Sigaudo;Marco Rabuffetti

  • Pain and body awareness: evidence from brain-damaged patients with delusional body ownership.

    Lorenzo Pia;Francesca Garbarini;Carlotta Fossataro;Luca Fornia

  • Effects of emotional face cueing on line bisection in neglect: a single case study.

    Marco Tamietto;Luca Latini Corazzini;Lorenzo Pia;Marina Zettin

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Walter
Henrik Walter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Susanne Erk
Susanne Erk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Cristina Becchio
Cristina Becchio Italian Institute of Technology
Marco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto University of Turin
Giuliano Geminiani
Giuliano Geminiani University of Turin
Marco Bove
Marco Bove University of Genoa
Roberto Cubelli
Roberto Cubelli University of Trento
Francesca Frassinetti
Francesca Frassinetti University of Bologna
Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca
Franco Cauda
Franco Cauda University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to many online degree and career opportunities, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Students considering these pathways should be aware that licensure requirements can vary greatly depending on the state where they plan to work.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a social worker, you'll need to follow specific guidelines for licensure, such as the social worker degree requirements in Idaho. Similarly, understanding the social worker education requirements in Illinois or the degree needed to be a social worker in Indiana is critical for planning your academic journey.

Guided by state-specific laws, such as the social worker degree requirements in Iowa, earning an undergraduate or graduate degree online can prepare you for various rewarding roles. These include licensed clinical social worker, school counselor, or mental health advocate, providing broad career options for psychology graduates across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Lorenzo Pia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles