World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4969
World Ranking
10205
National Ranking
231

Fabrizio Doricchi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabrizio Doricchi sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fabrizio Doricchi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabrizio Doricchi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabrizio Doricchi is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The scope of their work extends to related subfields such as statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and automotive engineering.

Their studies cover key topics including:

  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Frequent collaborators of Fabrizio Doricchi include Stefano Lasaponara, Mário Pinto, Michele Pellegrino, Gabriele Scozia, and Fabio Marson. Their joint work reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating psychology, brain sciences, and computational methods.

Publications by Fabrizio Doricchi have appeared repeatedly in prominent journals, with regular contributions to venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Brain Sciences, Cortex, Physics of Life Reviews, and the Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Doricchi include:

  • "Left and right temporal-parietal junctions (TPJs) as 'match/mismatch' hedonic machines: A unifying account of TPJ function," 2022, Physics of Life Reviews
  • "Deficits of hierarchical predictive coding in left spatial neglect," 2021, Brain Communications

Other significant publications include:

  • "A Scoping Review of Cognitive Training in Neurodegenerative Diseases via Computerized and Virtual Reality Tools: What We Know So Far," 2021, Brain Sciences

Doricchi's research integrates experimental and theoretical approaches to better understand spatial neglect, predictive coding, and cognitive functions related to the brain's processing mechanisms. Their work on the spatial representation of numerical cognition and the neural mechanisms involved in spatial attention contributes to current discussions in cognitive neuroscience.

Their extensive research has been referenced in various contexts, indicating an ongoing contribution to the broader neuroscience community and interdisciplinary study of brain function and behavior.

Best Publications

  • Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome

    Paolo Bartolomeo;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Fabrizio Doricchi

  • White matter (dis)connections and gray matter (dys)functions in visual neglect: Gaining insights into the brain networks of spatial awareness

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Francesco Tomaiuolo;Paolo Bartolomeo

  • Damage to White Matter Pathways in Subacute and Chronic Spatial Neglect: A Group Study and 2 Single-Case Studies with Complete Virtual “In Vivo” Tractography Dissection

    Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Francesco Tomaiuolo;Marilena Aiello;Sheila Merola

  • The anatomy of neglect without hemianopia: a key role for parietal-frontal disconnection?

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Francesco Tomaiuolo

  • Neural Correlates of the Spatial and Expectancy Components of Endogenous and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention in the Posner Task

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Enrica Macci;Massimo Silvetti;Emiliano Macaluso

  • Neural control of fast-regular saccades and antisaccades: an investigation using positron emission tomography

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Daniela Perani;Chiara Incoccia;Franco Grassi

  • Misrepresentation of horizontal space in left unilateral neglect Role of hemianopia

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Paola Angelelli

  • Attention and predictions: control of spatial attention beyond the endogenous-exogenous dichotomy

    Emiliano Macaluso;Fabrizio Doricchi

  • Disturbances of the rapid eye movements (REMs) of REM sleep in patients with unilateral attentional neglect: clue for the understanding of the functional meaning of REMs ☆

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Cecilia Guariglia;Stefano Paolucci;Luigi Pizzamiglio

  • Spatial attention and conscious perception: the role of endogenous and exogenous orienting

    Ana B. Chica;Stefano Lasaponara;Lorena Chanes;Lorena Chanes;Antoni Valero-Cabré;Antoni Valero-Cabré;Antoni Valero-Cabré

  • Attentional functions in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease.

    Giuseppe Meco;Marina Gasparini;Fabrizio Doricchi

  • No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage.

    Marilena Aiello;Sophie Jacquin-Courtois;Sheila Merola;Teresa Ottaviani

  • Exogenous attention can capture perceptual consciousness: ERP and behavioural evidence

    Ana B. Chica;Stefano Lasaponara;Juan Lupiáñez;Fabrizio Doricchi

  • Selective visual neglect in right brain damaged patients with splenial interhemispheric disconnection.

    Francesco Tomaiuolo;Loredana Voci;Marco Bresci;Sabino Cozza

  • Effects of Vestibular Rotatory Accelerations on Covert Attentional Orienting in Vision and Touch

    Francesca Figliozzi;Paola Guariglia;Massimo Silvetti;Isabelle Siegler

  • Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line

    Jean Philippe van Dijck;Wim Gevers;Christophe Lafosse;Fabrizio Doricchi

  • Neglect "around the clock": Dissociating number and spatial neglect in right brain damage

    Yves Rossetti;Sophie Jacquin-Courtois;Marilena Aiello;Masami Ishihara

  • Gravity and hemineglect

    L. Pizzamiglio;G. Vallar;F. Doricchi

  • Left and right temporal-parietal junctions (TPJs) as “match/mismatch” hedonic machines: A unifying account of TPJ function

    Unknown

  • Horizontal space misrepresentation in unilateral brain damage. II. Eye-head centered modulation of visual misrepresentation in hemianopia without neglect.

    Fabrizio Doricchi;Alessandra Onida;Paola Guariglia

  • A Scoping Review of Cognitive Training in Neurodegenerative Diseases via Computerized and Virtual Reality Tools: What We Know So Far.

    Stefano Lasaponara;Fabio Marson;Fabrizio Doricchi;Marco Cavallo

  • Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements

    Fabrizio Doricchi;P. Guariglia;F. Figliozzi;M. Silvetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Tomaiuolo
Francesco Tomaiuolo University of Messina
Paolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo Allen Institute for Brain Science
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten University of Bordeaux
Gaspare Galati
Gaspare Galati Sapienza University of Rome
Luigi Pizzamiglio
Luigi Pizzamiglio Sapienza University of Rome
Emiliano Macaluso
Emiliano Macaluso Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Cristiano Violani
Cristiano Violani Sapienza University of Rome
Juan Lupiáñez
Juan Lupiáñez University of Granada
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University
Maria Casagrande
Maria Casagrande Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced psychology education in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths and specializations. Many students opt for dual psyd programs that combine a master’s and doctoral curriculum. These accelerated paths are great for those seeking comprehensive clinical training in less time.

Specialized fields are also popular choices for graduate students. For example, students interested in research and theory on human development should explore the best developmental psychology phd programs. These programs focus on how people grow and change across the lifespan and can lead to academic, research, or applied roles.

The phd psychology programs offer broad training in research, teaching, and clinical practice, establishing graduates as experts in their field. Meanwhile, those interested in legal and criminal justice settings should consider forensic psychology phd programs, opening careers in forensic assessment, legal consulting, or correctional facilities.

Online and hybrid degree options make these pathways more accessible than ever, allowing flexibility for working professionals and students around the world.

Best Scientists Citing Fabrizio Doricchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles