World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6440
World Ranking
8842
National Ranking
894

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6498
World Ranking
8526
National Ranking
629

James R. Tresilian publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Tresilian sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 133 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James R. Tresilian D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Tresilian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Tresilian is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with specific attention to cognitive neuroscience and biomedical engineering. Their work also covers related subfields such as neurology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and psychiatry and mental health.

They have contributed to several main topics within neuroscience including motor control and adaptation, muscle activation and electromyography studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, neural dynamics and brain function, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience.

Notable recent publications by James R. Tresilian include:

  • "Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect" (2020) published in European Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Premovement inhibition can protect motor actions from interference by response-irrelevant sensory stimulation" (2021) published in The Journal of Physiology
  • "Early Motor Trajectories Predict Motor but not Cognitive Function in Preterm- and Term-Born Adults without Pre-existing Neurological Conditions" (2020) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Preparatory suppression and facilitation of voluntary and involuntary responses to loud acoustic stimuli in an anticipatory timing task" (2020) published in Psychophysiology
  • "Acoustic stimulation increases implicit adaptation in sensorimotor adaptation" (2021) published in European Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in their research include Welber Marinovic, Ottmar V. Lipp, An T. Nguyen, Aaron N. McInnes, and Ann-Maree Vallence.

Their work has appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychophysiology
  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • The Journal of Physiology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.

    J. R. Tresilian

  • Visually timed action: time-out for `tau'?

    James R. Tresilian

  • Grip-load force coupling: a general control strategy for transporting objects

    James Randall Flanagan;James R. Tresilian

  • Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.

    James R. Tresilian

  • Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects

    J.Randall Flanagan;James Tresilian;Alan M. Wing

  • Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus

    Mark Mon-Williams;Mark Mon-Williams;James R Tresilian;Niall C Strang;Puja Kochhar

  • Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.

    James R Tresilian

  • Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance

    James R. Tresilian;Mark Mon-Williams;Benjamin M. Kelly

  • Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action.

    James R Tresilian

  • Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception

    Mark Mon-Williams;James R Tresilian

  • Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension

    James R. Tresilian

  • Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions.

    James R. Tresilian

  • The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements.

    Mark Mon-Williams;James R. Tresilian;Vanessa L. Coppard;Richard G. Carson

  • Approximate information sources and perceptual variables in interceptive timing.

    J. R. Tresilian

  • Ordinal depth information from accommodation

    Mark Mon-Williams;James R. Tresilian

  • The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: How much and when?

    Mark R. Hinder;James R. Tresilian;James R. Tresilian;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson;Richard G. Carson

  • Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands

    Stephan Riek;James R. Tresilian;M. Mon-Williams;Vanessa L. Coppard

  • Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III)

    Mark Mon-Williams;James R. Tresilian;Robert D. McIntosh;David A. Milner

  • Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace

    Daniel G. Woolley;James R. Tresilian;Richard G. Carson;Richard G. Carson;Stephan Riek

  • Stability of reach-to-grasp movement patterns in Parkinson's disease.

    James R. Tresilian;George E. Stelmach;Charles H. Adler

  • Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude.

    James R. Tresilian;Andrew Lonergan

  • Motor Control and Learning

    Mark Mon‐Williams;James R Tresilian;John P Wann

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Riek
Stephan Riek University of Queensland
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Richard G. Carson
Richard G. Carson Trinity College Dublin
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
John P. Wann
John P. Wann Royal Holloway University of London
Markus Kofler
Markus Kofler Innsbruck Medical University
Dieter Wolke
Dieter Wolke University of Warwick
George E. Stelmach
George E. Stelmach Arizona State University
Robert D. McIntosh
Robert D. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
J. Randall Flanagan
J. Randall Flanagan Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience often explore related fields such as psychology, social work, and counseling. These areas offer diverse career opportunities that complement a neuroscience background. Online education, especially accelerated programs, can help you fast-track your career while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in social work, an accelerated msw program online can launch your career in a variety of settings, from healthcare to community organizations. If you’re more drawn to understanding behavior and the mind, consider the accelerated psychology degree programs available online.

For students aiming to become professional counselors, it’s important to choose programs with the right accreditation. Browse cacrep accredited programs online to ensure your degree meets industry standards. If affordability is a top priority, explore the cheapest counseling degree online options to get quality education on a budget.

Combining neuroscience with these fields can open doors to innovative careers in research, therapy, and clinical practice, especially as mental health and neurobiological understanding continue to intersect.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Tresilian

Trending Scientists