World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6715
World Ranking
8076
National Ranking
236

Stephan Riek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Riek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephan Riek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Riek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan Riek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their work spans multiple fields, predominantly focusing on neuroscience and medicine. Within these domains, they have contributed to several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, biomedical engineering, neurology, behavioral neuroscience, and developmental neuroscience.

Their research explores a variety of topics with particular emphasis on EEG and brain-computer interfaces, hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, motor control and adaptation, muscle activation and electromyography studies, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, stress responses and cortisol, and mechanisms of neurogenesis and neuroplasticity.

Stephan Riek has co-authored publications with researchers such as James R. Tresilian, Welber Marinovic, Mia A. Schaumberg, Grace Rose, and Tina L. Skinner. These frequent collaborations highlight interdisciplinary connections within their fields of study.

Their research has been published in journals including the European Journal of Neuroscience, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Aging and Disease, Human Movement Science, and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. The distribution of publications across these venues reflects a focus on both fundamental and applied neuroscience topics.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Stephan Riek include:

  • Long-Term Improvement in Hippocampal-Dependent Learning Ability in Healthy, Aged Individuals Following High Intensity Interval Training (2024, Aging and Disease)
  • Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect (2020, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Acoustic stimulation increases implicit adaptation in sensorimotor adaptation (2021, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Acoustic stimulation increases implicit adaptation in sensorimotor adaptation (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

Best Publications

  • Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching : mechanisms and clinical implications.

    Melanie J. Sharman;Andrew G. Cresswell;Stephan Riek

  • Neural adaptations to resistance training: implications for movement control.

    Timothy J. Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson

  • Strength Versus Muscle Power-Specific Resistance Training in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

    Tim R. Henwood;Stephan Riek;Dennis R. Taaffe

  • Neural Influences on Sprint Running Training Adaptations and Acute Responses

    Angus Ross;Michael Leveritt;Stephan Riek

  • The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans

    Timothy J. Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson

  • Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

    Timothy J Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G Carson

  • Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions

    Richard G. Carson;Stephan Riek;Nosratollah Shahbazpour

  • Improved language performance subsequent to low-frequency rTMS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke

    Caroline H S Barwood;Bruce E. Murdoch;B. M. Whelan;David Lloyd

  • Neural adaptations to strength training: Moving beyond transcranial magnetic stimulation and reflex studies

    T. J. Carroll;V. S. Selvanayagam;V. S. Selvanayagam;S. Riek;J. G. Semmler

  • Excitability changes in human forearm corticospinal projections and spinal reflex pathways during rhythmic voluntary movement of the opposite limb

    Richard Carson;S. Riek;D.C. Mackey;D.C. Mackey;D.P. Meichenbaum;D.P. Meichenbaum

  • Motor Unit Recruitment Strategies Are Altered during Deep-Tissue Pain

    Kylie Tucker;Jane Butler;Thomas Graven-Nielsen;Stephan Riek

  • Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry

    Steven Mark Miller;Guang B Liu;Trung Thanh Ngo;Gregory S Hooper

  • Recruitment and rate coding organisation for soleus motor units across entire range of voluntary isometric plantar flexions

    Tomomichi Oya;Stephan Riek;Andrew G. Cresswell

  • Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors.

    Stephan Riek;Parveen Bawa

  • Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of unimanual and bimanual coordination.

    Richard G. Carson;Stephan Riek;Christopher J. Smethurst;Juan Franscisco Lisón Párraga

  • Resistance training enhances the stability of sensorimotor coordination

    T.J. Carroll;B. Barry;S. Riek;Richard Carson

  • Early neural responses to strength training

    Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam;Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam;Stephan Riek;Timothy John Carroll

  • The effects of low frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and sham condition rTMS on behavioural language in chronic non-fluent aphasia: Short term outcomes.

    Caroline H S Barwood;Bruce E. Murdoch;Brooke Mai Whelan;David Lloyd

  • The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: How much and when?

    Mark R. Hinder;James R. Tresilian;James R. Tresilian;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson;Richard G. Carson

  • Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands

    Stephan Riek;James R. Tresilian;M. Mon-Williams;Vanessa L. Coppard

  • Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of unimanual and bimanual coordination

    W. D. Byblow;R. G. Carson;J. F. Lison;S. Riek

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Carson
Richard G. Carson Trinity College Dublin
James R. Tresilian
James R. Tresilian University of Warwick
Mark S. Horswill
Mark S. Horswill University of Queensland
Bruce E. Murdoch
Bruce E. Murdoch University of Queensland
Winston D. Byblow
Winston D. Byblow University of Auckland
Andrew Wong
Andrew Wong University College London
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Olivier Salvado
Olivier Salvado Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Markus Kofler
Markus Kofler Innsbruck Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephan Riek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles