World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
21508
World Ranking
7368
National Ranking
435

Robert E. Wood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Wood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Robert E. Wood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert E. Wood is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on dentistry and psychology.

Their scientific contributions include work published in various journals covering topics such as dental radiography, performance under emotional conditions, and atmospheric sciences. Notable recent papers include:

  • The use of radiographic imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, Canada (2020, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology)
  • Situation contingent negative emotions and performance: The moderating role of trait neuroticism (2022, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Biomass-burning smoke's properties and its interactions with marine stratocumulus clouds in WRF-CAM5 and southeastern Atlantic field campaigns (2023, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Radiograph prescription practices of dentists in Ontario, Canada (2021, The Journal of the American Dental Association)
  • Data for paper: Simulating aerosol lifecycle impacts on the subtropical stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition using large-eddy simulations (2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research))

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert E. Wood include Rolland C. Gillies, Carlos Quiñonez, Ernest W.N. Lam, Nadin Beckmann, and Shuang Ren.

The primary publication venues for their work are:

  • Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association

Robert E. Wood's research covers these main fields of study:

  • Dentistry
  • Psychology

With regard to subfields, their work touches on:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

The scientist's major research topics include:

  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Dental Research and COVID-19

In addition to journal publications, Robert E. Wood has contributed to book literature. One recorded book publication is with Springer Nature titled Exploring Institutional Behavioural Elements Needed to Support Knowledge Management in Higher Education Partnerships, published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management

    Robert Wood;Albert Bandura

  • Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making.

    Robert Wood;Albert Bandura

  • Task complexity: Definition of the construct

    Robert E Wood

  • Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making.

    Albert Bandura;Robert Wood

  • Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis.

    Robert E. Wood;Anthony J. Mento;Edwin A. Locke

  • The Relation of Self-Efficacy and Grade Goals to Academic Performance

    Robert E. Wood;Edwin A. Locke

  • Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments

    Robert Wood;Albert Bandura;Trevor Bailey

  • Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model☆

    Terence R. Mitchell;Robert E. Wood

  • Self- versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs.

    Paul W. B. Atkins;Robert E. Wood

  • Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity

    Michael Shayne Gary;Robert E. Wood

  • Self-efficacy and academic achievement in Australian high school students: the mediating effects of academic aspirations and delinquency.

    Annemaree Carroll;Stephen Houghton;Robert Wood;Kerrie Unsworth

  • Harmful Workplace Experiences and Women’s Occupational Well-Being A Meta-Analysis

    Victor E. Sojo;Robert E. Wood;Anna E. Genat

  • Goal setting and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance.

    Daniel Cervone;Nizar Jiwani;Robert Wood

  • Mediation Testing in Management Research: A Review and Proposals

    Robert E. Wood;Jodi S. Goodman;Nadin Beckmann;Alison Cook

  • Feedback Specificity, Exploration, and Learning.

    Jodi S. Goodman;Robert E. Wood;Margaretha Hendrickx

  • Manager behavior in a social context: the impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions.

    Robert E. Wood;Terence R. Mitchell

  • Implicit Theories versus the Social Construal of Ability in Self-Regulation and Performance on a Complex Task.

    Carmen Tabernero;Robert E. Wood;Robert E. Wood

  • Impact of guided exploration and enactive exploration on self-regulatory mechanisms and information acquisition through electronic search.

    Shelda Debowski;Robert E. Wood;Albert Bandura

  • Feedback specificity, learning opportunities, and learning.

    Jodi S. Goodman;Robert E. Wood

  • Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making

    Michael Shayne Gary;Robert E. Wood;Tracey Pillinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Bandura
Albert Bandura Stanford University
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington
Annemaree Carroll
Annemaree Carroll University of Queensland
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Stephen Houghton
Stephen Houghton University of Western Australia
Daniel Cervone
Daniel Cervone University of Illinois at Chicago
Edwin A. Locke
Edwin A. Locke University of Maryland, College Park
E. James Kehoe
E. James Kehoe University of New South Wales
John Hattie
John Hattie University of Melbourne
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a diverse range of online study options and career pathways in the USA. Many students are drawn to specialized fields such as Applied Behavior Analysis, where becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular choice. If you are interested in this career, it’s important to understand the varying educational and certification requirements in different cities.

For instance, the path on how to become a bcba in Honolulu may differ slightly from the Houston bcba education requirements or the bcba certification requirements in Huntsville. Additionally, becoming a bcba in Indianapolis brings its own set of local regulations and steps.

Many accredited universities now offer flexible online master’s programs and certification pathways that meet BCBA standards across the country. As you research your options, consider not only the national board requirements but also local expectations and job opportunities for your chosen city or state.

Best Scientists Citing Robert E. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles