World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 30 11387 10644 647 629 92 3477

E. James Kehoe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. James Kehoe between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. James Kehoe published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2011. 2 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2011. 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1973 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. James Kehoe: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 4
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 0
1997 3
1998 0
1999 4
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 5
2012 2
2013 4
2014 4
2015 3
2016 3
2017 3
2018 4
2019 4
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 108
Download as CSV

E. James Kehoe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. James Kehoe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 92
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. James Kehoe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. James Kehoe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 30
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. James Kehoe is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. The scientist's research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Business, Management and Accounting as well as Psychology. Their work addresses key subfields such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Artificial Intelligence.

The topics covered extensively in their research include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies, Emotional Intelligence and Performance, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Social Media and Politics, and Physical Activity and Health.

Kehoe has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent appearances in the Journal of Change Management, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, and Physical Activity Review.

The following notable papers exemplify their recent research contributions:

  • Attitudes toward Change and Transformational Leadership: A Longitudinal Study, 2020, Journal of Change Management
  • The Distinctiveness and Stability of Employee Attitudes Toward Change and Their Relationship with Leadership: A Longitudinal Study, 2025, Journal of Change Management
  • Alluring or Alarming? The Polarizing Effect of Forbidden Knowledge in Political Discourse, 2024, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Toward a Mediated Model of Physical Activity in Relation to Psychological Distress, 2022, Physical Activity Review

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Matthew David Henricks
  • Michael B. Young
  • Timothy Colin Bednall
  • Victoria Ashley Parker
  • Jeffrey Martin Lees

Best Publications

  • A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration.

    E. James Kehoe

  • Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli.

    E. James Kehoe;I. Gormezano

  • Stimulus representation and the timing of reward-prediction errors in models of the dopamine system

    Elliot A. Ludvig;Richard S. Sutton;E. James Kehoe

  • Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response under fixed and mixed CS-US intervals

    J.R. Millenson;E.James Kehoe;I. Gormezano

  • Summation and configuration in patterning schedules with the rat and rabbit

    William P. Bellingham;Katy Gillette-Bellingham;E. James Kehoe

  • Evaluating the TD model of classical conditioning

    Elliot Andrew Ludvig;Richard S. Sutton;E. James Kehoe

  • Summation and configuration in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound stimuli.

    E. James Kehoe

  • Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit

    E. James Kehoe;Amanda J. Horne;Peter S. Horne;Michaela Macrae

  • Fundamental Behavioral Methods and Findings in Classical Conditioning

    E. James Kehoe;Michaela Macrae

  • Temporal primacy overrides prior training in serial compound conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response

    E. James Kehoe;Bernard G. Schreurs;Peita Graham

  • Summation and configuration: Stimulus compounding and negative patterning in the rabbit.

    E. James Kehoe;Peita Graham

  • Transfer across CS-US intervals and sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit

    E. James Kehoe;Phoebe E. Holt

  • Cross-modal transfer as a function of similarities between training tasks in classical conditioning of the rabbit

    Phoebe E. Holt;E. James Kehoe

  • Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of the CS2-CS1 and CS1-US intervals

    E. James Kehoe;Anne-Marie Feyer;Jennifer L. Moses

  • Pictures Block the Learning of Sightwords

    Robert T. Solman;Nirbhay N. Singh;E. James Kehoe

  • General transfer across sensory modalities survives reductions in the original conditioned reflex in the rabbit

    E. James Kehoe;Louise D. Morrow;Phoebe E. Holt

  • Extinction revisited: Similarities between extinction and reductions in US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response

    E. James Kehoe;Natasha E. white

  • Cross-modal transfer as a function of initial training level in classical conditioning with the rabbit

    Bernard G. Schreurs;E. James Kehoe

  • Savings in animal learning: Implications for relapse and maintenance after therapy

    E. James Kehoe;Michaela Macrae

  • Blocking acquisition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial conditioned stimuli

    E.James Kehoe;B.G. Schreurs;N. Amodei

  • Effects of self-regulatory instructional aids on self-directed study

    Timothy C. Bednall;E. James Kehoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard S. Sutton
Richard S. Sutton University of Alberta
Bernard G. Schreurs
Bernard G. Schreurs West Virginia University
Michael D. Mauk
Michael D. Mauk The University of Texas at Austin
Ann Williamson
Ann Williamson University of New South Wales
Julie D. Henry
Julie D. Henry University of Queensland
D. Brynn Hibbert
D. Brynn Hibbert University of New South Wales
Michael Archer
Michael Archer University of New South Wales
Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Robert E. Wood
Robert E. Wood University of New South Wales
Alistair G. B. Poore
Alistair G. B. Poore University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer more flexibility and affordability than ever before. With numerous accredited programs now available, students nationwide can find options that match their budget and career goals. For example, those interested in affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Georgia will find several respected institutions offering comprehensive curriculums at lower costs.

Regional differences can play a role in cost and course offerings. Students considering affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Minnesota benefit from unique program designs tailored to local workforce needs. In contrast, aspiring psychologists in the Northeast can explore the New York cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree to maximize savings without sacrificing educational quality.

The South also stands out for affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in the South, giving students access to flexible learning formats and support services. Graduates from these online psychology programs are well-prepared for entry-level human services roles or to pursue further studies, such as master's or doctoral degrees. As career pathways in psychology continue to expand, selecting the right affordable online degree lays a solid foundation for future success in counseling, research, organizational psychology, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing E. James Kehoe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles