World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
11371
World Ranking
4586
National Ranking
2549

M. E. Bitterman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. E. Bitterman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 260 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. E. Bitterman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. E. Bitterman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

M. E. Bitterman was affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their academic career was marked by recognition from prominent scientific and administrative institutions.

Bitterman was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1975. Additionally, they were a Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration, although the exact year of this distinction is not documented.

Throughout their career, Bitterman did not have publicly listed recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with their work. Similarly, there is no detailed record of book publications or specific fields and subfields of study. Main topics of research and work were also not itemized in available records.

This lack of detailed publication data limits a comprehensive review of their specific academic contributions or research themes. However, the honors achieved suggest a level of involvement and contribution within scientific and administrative circles, particularly in public administration and science advancement.

The scientist is deceased, and available information highlights the recognition they received during their professional lifetime.

Best Publications

  • The Comparative Analysis of Learning

    M. E. Bitterman

  • PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.

    Bitterman Me

  • Toward a comparative psychology of learning.

    M. E. Bitterman

  • Incentive contrast in honey bees.

    ME Bitterman

  • Evolution of Brain and Behavior in Vertebrates

    R.B. Masterton;M.E. Bitterman;C.B.G. Campbell;Nicholas Hotton

  • Some comparative psychology.

    M. E. Bitterman;Jerome Wodinsky;Douglas K. Candland

  • Some phenomena of associative learning in honeybees.

    P. A. Couvillon;M. E. Bitterman

  • The role of contingency in classical conditioning.

    Mauricio R. Papini;M. E. Bitterman

  • Reward and learning in the goldfish.

    Gillian Lowes;M. E. Bitterman

  • Comparative analysis of learning in honeybees

    M. E. Bitterman

  • Runway performance of goldfish as a function of complete and incomplete reduction in amount of reward

    R. C. Gonzalez;Alcine Potts;Katherine Pitcoff;M. E. Bitterman

  • Probability-Matching in the Fish

    Erika R. Behrend;M. E. Bitterman

  • Compound conditioning in honeybees.

    P. A. Couvillon;M. E. Bitterman

  • Successive negative contrast in the consummatory responding of didelphid marsupials

    Mauricio R. Papini;Alba E. Mustaca;M. E. Bitterman

  • A conventional conditioning analysis of "transitive inference" in pigeons.

    P. A. Couvillon;M. E. Bitterman

  • Blocking and overshadowing in two species of fish.

    W. A. Tennant;M. E. Bitterman

  • Vertebrate-Invertebrate Comparisons

    M. E. Bitterman

  • Classical conditioning in the goldfish as a function of the CS-UCS interval.

    Bitterman Me

  • Principles of Dynamic Psychiatry

    Unknown

  • Reward and learning in the turtle

    Agu Pert;M.E. Bitterman

  • The effect of partial reinforcement with spaced practice on resistance to extinction in the fish.

    Nicholas Longo;M. E. Bitterman

Frequent Co-Authors

William A. Roberts
William A. Roberts University of Western Ontario
Mauricio R. Papini
Mauricio R. Papini Texas Christian University
Peter D. Balsam
Peter D. Balsam Columbia University
Felicia A. Huppert
Felicia A. Huppert University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, from mental health counseling to research and clinical roles. Many students opt for online psychology degrees, providing flexibility while meeting rigorous educational standards.

If you're interested in counseling, it's important to understand location-specific requirements. For example, Omaha mental health counselor education requirements highlight the need for accredited graduate degrees and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, understanding mental health counselor requirements in Orlando is essential for those planning to practice in Florida, where state-approved coursework and licensure exams are required.

Prospective counselors in other regions should review the steps to become a mental health counselor in Philadelphia, where graduate training and post-master’s experience are crucial, and Phoenix mental health counselor education requirements, focusing on meeting Arizona’s licensure standards.

Each pathway underscores the importance of accredited online programs, clinical internships, and licensure exams to ensure career readiness. Understanding these requirements will help you plan your educational journey and future in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing M. E. Bitterman

Recently Published Articles