World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
11688
World Ranking
6596
National Ranking
2861

Michael D. Mauk publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Mauk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael D. Mauk D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Mauk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael D. Mauk is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with specific attention to subfields such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, and molecular biology.

Their recent published work includes the following papers:

  • Feedback inhibition underlies new computational functions of cerebellar interneurons, 2022, eLife
  • Feedback Inhibition Underlies New Computational Functions of Cerebellar Interneurons, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Michael D. Mauk collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Hunter E. Halverson
  • Jinsook Kim
  • Andrei Khilkevich
  • George J Augustine

Their work has been published prominently in venues such as:

  • eLife
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The main fields of study covered in their research are:

  • Neuroscience

Subfields within neuroscience in which they have produced research include:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology

Their research addresses key topics such as:

  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Retinal Development and Disorders

Best Publications

  • An essential role for postsynaptic calmodulin and protein kinase activity in long-term potentiation

    Robert C. Malenka;Julie A. Kauer;David J. Perkel;Michael D. Mauk

  • The neural basis of temporal processing

    Michael D. Mauk;Dean V. Buonomano

  • The Cerebellum: A Neuronal Learning Machine?

    Jennifer L. Raymond;Stephen G. Lisberger;Michael D. Mauk

  • Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses

    Stephen P. Perrett;Blenda P. Ruiz;Michael D. Mauk

  • Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus.

    Michael D. Mauk;Joseph E. Steinmetz;Richard F. Thompson

  • Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation

    Javier F. Medina;Keith S. Garcia;William L. Nores;Nichole M. Taylor

  • Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing.

    Javier F. Medina;Michael D. Mauk

  • Neural network model of the cerebellum: temporal discrimination and the timing of motor responses

    Dean V. Buonomano;Michael D. Mauk

  • Parallels between cerebellum- and amygdala-dependent conditioning.

    Javier F. Medina;J. Christopher Repa;Michael D. Mauk;Joseph E. LeDoux

  • A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum.

    Michael D. Mauk;Nelson H. Donegan

  • Retention of classically conditioned eyelid responses following acute decerebration.

    Michael D. Mauk;Richard F. Thompson

  • What the cerebellum computes.

    Tatsuya Ohyama;William L. Nores;Matthew Murphy;Michael D. Mauk

  • Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses

    Javier F Medina;William L Nores;Michael D Mauk

  • A Mechanism for Savings in the Cerebellum

    Javier F. Medina;Keith S. Garcia;Michael D. Mauk

  • Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning

    Javier F Medina;William L Nores;Tatsuya Ohyama;Michael D Mauk

  • Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contributions to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses

    Keith S Garcia;Michael D Mauk

  • Cerebellar function: coordination, learning or timing?

    Michael Mauk;J. F. Medina;W. L. Nores;T. Ohyama

  • Roles of Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei in Motor Learning: Contradictions or Clues?

    Michael D. Mauk

  • Activity-evoked increases in extracellular potassium modulate presynaptic excitability in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

    N. P. Poolos;Michael Mauk;J. D. Kocsis

  • Inhibitory Control of LTP and LTD: Stability of Synapse Strength

    Philip M. Steele;Michael D. Mauk

Frequent Co-Authors

Javier F. Medina
Javier F. Medina Baylor College of Medicine
Jack D. Barchas
Jack D. Barchas Cornell University
Abba J. Kastin
Abba J. Kastin Louisiana State University
Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Dean V. Buonomano
Dean V. Buonomano University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen J. Peroutka
Stephen J. Peroutka Stanford University
Robert C. Malenka
Robert C. Malenka Stanford University
Rick Richardson
Rick Richardson University of New South Wales
Michael S. Fanselow
Michael S. Fanselow University of California, Los Angeles
E. James Kehoe
E. James Kehoe University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Mauk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles