World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
16063
World Ranking
7755
National Ranking
3351

Sugih Jamin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sugih Jamin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sugih Jamin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sugih Jamin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2001 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Sugih Jamin is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, focusing significantly on subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications as well as Artificial Intelligence. The volume of work in these areas highlights a research trajectory concentrated on network technologies and related computational methods.

Their main topics of research cover several areas including:

  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Recent scholarly contributions by Sugih Jamin include papers published in well-regarded venues. These publications provide insight into specific dynamics of internet load balancing and performance metrics:

  • Measuring congestion-induced performance imbalance in Internet load balancing at scale, 2024, Computer Networks
  • Latency Imbalance Among Internet Load-Balanced Paths, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • Latency Imbalance Among Internet Load-Balanced Paths, 2020, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review

Collaboration plays a role in Jamin's work, with frequent co-authors contributing across various projects. These colleagues include:

  • Yibo Pi
  • Peter B. Danzig
  • Yichen Wei
  • Feng Qian

Publication venues reflect the focus and specialization of Jamin's research within computer networking:

  • Computer Networks
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review

Recognition in the professional community is noted by honors such as the ACM Senior Member status awarded in 2009 and being named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2001. These distinctions indicate longstanding engagement and contributions within their academic discipline.

Best Publications

  • Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification

    L. Zhang;S. Berson;S. Herzog;S. Jamin

  • IDMaps: a global internet host distance estimation service

    Paul Francis;Sugih Jamin;Cheng Jin;Yixin Jin

  • Host multicast: a framework for delivering multicast to end users

    Beichuan Zhang;S. Jamin;Lixia Zhang

  • The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited

    Qian Chen;Hyunseok Chang;R. Govindan;S. Jamin

  • A measurement-based admission control algorithm for integrated service packet networks

    Sugih Jamin;Peter B. Danzig;Scott J. Shenker;Lixia Zhang

  • Network topology generators: degree-based vs. structural

    Hongsuda Tangmunarunkit;Ramesh Govindan;Sugih Jamin;Scott Shenker

  • Inet-3.0: Internet Topology Generator

    Jared Winick;Sugih Jamin

  • Characteristics of wide-area TCP/IP conversations

    Ramón Cáceres;Peter B. Danzig;Sugih Jamin;Danny J. Mitzel

  • On the placement of Internet instrumentation

    S. Jamin;Cheng Jin;Yixin Jin;D. Raz

  • Constrained mirror placement on the Internet

    S. Jamin;Cheng Jin;A.R. Kurc;D. Raz

  • A measurement-based admission control algorithm for integrated services packet networks

    Sugih Jamin;Peter B. Danzig;Scott Shenker;Lixia Zhang

  • Comments on the performance of measurement-based admission control algorithms

    L. Breslau;S. Jamin;S. Shenker

  • Comparison of measurement-based admission control algorithms for controlled-load service

    S. Jamin;S.J. Shenker;P.B. Danzig

  • Scaling phenomena in the Internet: Critically examining criticality

    Walter Willinger;Ramesh Govindan;Sugih Jamin;Vern Paxson

  • An architecture for a global Internet host distance estimation service

    P. Francis;S. Jamin;V. Paxson;Lixia Zhang

  • Towards capturing representative AS-level Internet topologies

    Hyunseok Chang;Ramesh Govindan;Sugih Jamin;Scott J. Shenker

  • An Empirical Workload Model for Driving Wide-Area TCP/IP Network Simulations

    Peter B. Danzig;Sugih Jamin;Ramón Cáceres;Danny J. Mitzel

  • An Efficient Synchronization Mechanism for Mirrored Game Architectures

    Eric Cronin;Anthony R. Kurc;Burton Filstrup;Sugih Jamin

  • To Peer or Not to Peer: Modeling the Evolution of the Internet's AS-Level Topology

    H. Chang;S. Jamin;W. Willinger

  • Constrained mirror placement on the Internet

    E. Cronin;S. Jamin;Cheng Jin;A.R. Kurc

  • Universal IP Multicast Delivery.

    Beichuan Zhang;Sugih Jamin;Lixia Zhang

  • The Origin of Power Laws in Internet Topologies

    Qian Chen;Hyunseok Chang;Ramesh Govindan;Sugih Jamin

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott Shenker
Scott Shenker University of California, Berkeley
Lixia Zhang
Lixia Zhang University of California, Los Angeles
Yuval Shavitt
Yuval Shavitt Tel Aviv University
Danny Raz
Danny Raz Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Walter Willinger
Walter Willinger NIKSUN, Inc.
Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason
Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ramesh Govindan
Ramesh Govindan University of Southern California
Beichuan Zhang
Beichuan Zhang University of Arizona
Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science is just the beginning of a wide array of in-demand STEM fields you can study online. For those interested in the intersection of technology and environmental solutions, consider an online environmental engineering degree. This pathway can lead to careers in sustainability, green energy, and regulatory compliance.

If you are fascinated by the mechanics and dynamics of machines, an online degree in mechanical engineering may be an excellent fit. It can open up opportunities in manufacturing, robotics, and automotive sectors.

For those who want a deep dive into the fundamentals of matter and energy, you might look for the cheapest online physics degree programs. This path can lead to research, teaching, or development careers that require strong analytical skills.

Additionally, as data-driven decision-making grows in importance, pursuing data science programs can set you up for fast-growing jobs in analytics, artificial intelligence, and business intelligence.

Best Scientists Citing Sugih Jamin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles