World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
4993
World Ranking
8338
National Ranking
835

John L. Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John L. Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John L. Taylor is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with specializations in clinical psychology and related fields such as general health professions, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and sociology and political science.

Their publication record demonstrates engagement with a range of journals, notably:

  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
  • BJPsych Bulletin
  • The Lancet Psychiatry

John L. Taylor's work covers several key topics including healthcare decision-making and restraints, child and adolescent health, psychotherapy techniques and applications, child abuse and trauma, healthcare innovation and challenges, art therapy and mental health, and research concerning Down syndrome and intellectual disability.

Frequent co-authors of Taylor include:

  • Carole Burrell
  • Simon Hackett
  • Ania Zubala
  • Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
  • Thomas Chadwick

Key recent publications by John L. Taylor feature:

  • Transforming care for people with intellectual disabilities and autism in England, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • A randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure care, 2020, Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Short report and initial evaluation of the factor structure of the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales (LANTS), 2021, Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • Responsibility as professional leadership and decision making: Interviews with non-medical Responsible Clinicians, 2020, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Fathers' mental Ill-health and child maltreatment: A systematic review of the literature, 2023, Children and Youth Services Review

Best Publications

  • Individual cognitive-behavioural anger treatment for people with mild-borderline intellectual disabilities and histories of aggression: a controlled trial

    John L. Taylor;Raymond W. Novaco;Bruce T. Gillmer;Alison Robertson

  • Assessment of anger and aggression in male offenders with developmental disabilities.

    Raymond W. Novaco;John L. Taylor

  • Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of VRAG, PCL-SV, and the HCR-20.

    Nicola Susan Gray;Suzanne Fitzgerald;John Taylor;Malcolm J. MacCulloch

  • Cognitive-behavioural treatment of anger intensity among offenders with intellectual disabilities

    John L. Taylor;Raymond W. Novaco;Bruce Gillmer;Ian Thorne

  • CBT for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Emerging Evidence, Cognitive Ability and IQ Effects

    John L. Taylor;William R. Lindsay;Paul Willner

  • Life events and psychiatric symptoms in adults with intellectual disabilities.

    Richard P. Hastings;C. Hatton;J. L. Taylor;C. Maddison

  • Risk Assessment in Offenders With Intellectual Disability: A Comparison Across Three Levels of Security

    William R. Lindsay;Todd E. Hogue;John L. Taylor;Lesley Steptoe

  • Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20

    Nicola S. Gray;John Taylor;Robert Jefferson Snowden

  • A review of the assessment and treatment of anger and aggression in offenders with intellectual disability.

    J. L. Taylor

  • A comparison of offenders with intellectual disability across three levels of security

    Todd Hogue;Lesley R. Steptoe;Lesley R. Steptoe;John L. Taylor;William R. Lindsay;William R. Lindsay;William R. Lindsay

  • Anger Treatment for People with Developmental Disabilities: A Theory, Evidence and Manual Based Approach

    John L. Taylor;Raymond W. Novaco;Bruce T Gillmer;Alison Robertson

  • Evaluation of a group intervention for convicted arsonists with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities

    John L. Taylor;Ian Thorne;Alison Robertson;Ginny Avery

  • Two studies on the prevalence and validity of personality disorder in three forensic intellectual disability samples

    William R. Lindsay;Todd E. Hogue;John L. Taylor;Paul Mooney

  • The Effects of Traumatizing Life Events on People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review

    Sarah Wigham;Chris Hatton;John L. Taylor

  • Screening for psychiatric symptoms: PAS-ADD Checklist norms for adults with intellectual disabilities

    J. L. Taylor;C. Hatton;L. Dixon;C. Douglas

  • Offenders with Developmental Disabilities

    William R. Lindsay;John L. Taylor;Peter Sturmey

  • Predictive validity of the PCL-R in offenders with intellectual disability in a high secure hospital setting: Institutional aggression

    Catrin Morrissey;Todd Hogue;Paul Mooney;Clare Allen

  • Pathways Into Services for Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities Childhood Experiences, Diagnostic Information, and Offense Variables

    William R. Lindsay;William R. Lindsay;Gregory O'Brien;Derek Carson;Anthony J. Holland

  • Predictive validity of the PCL-R for offenders with intellectual disability in a high security hospital: treatment progress.

    Catrin Morrissey;Paul Mooney;Todd E. Hogue;William R. Lindsay

  • Development of an imaginal provocation test to evaluate treatment for anger problems in people with intellectual disabilities

    John L. Taylor;Raymond W. Novaco;Claire Guinan;Nicola Street

  • Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: prevention, assessment and management

    Sally Ann Coooper;Steve Pilling;Regi Alexander;Stella Ayettey

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Lindsay
William R. Lindsay Abertay University
Raymond W. Novaco
Raymond W. Novaco University of California, Irvine
Chris Hatton
Chris Hatton Manchester Metropolitan University
Anthony J. Holland
Anthony J. Holland University of Cambridge
Richard P. Hastings
Richard P. Hastings University of Birmingham
Andrew Jahoda
Andrew Jahoda University of Glasgow
Clive R. Hollin
Clive R. Hollin University of Leicester
Nicola S. Gray
Nicola S. Gray Swansea University
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Mark H. Freeston
Mark H. Freeston Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to several online degrees and career pathways, particularly in school counseling and mental health services. School counselors play a vital role in student success and well-being, and the pathway to this rewarding career varies by state.

For instance, those interested can review the Alabama school counselor certification requirements to understand necessary degrees and practicum experiences. If you’re considering working in a different region, you should be aware that the Alaska school counselor certification requirements may differ in coursework, exams, and supervised fieldwork.

Similarly, the requirements to be a school counselor in Arizona often involve a specific number of graduate-level credits and classroom experience. Aspiring counselors in the southern states can also explore the steps for becoming a school counselor in Arkansas. In each case, online psychology and counseling degrees are a flexible and accessible starting point for these fulfilling career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing John L. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles