World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael A. Busseri

Michael A. Busseri

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5689
World Ranking
9203
National Ranking
625

Michael A. Busseri publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Busseri sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Michael A. Busseri D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Busseri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Busseri is a researcher affiliated with Brock University in Canada, specializing in the field of psychology. Their work primarily focuses on areas within experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and health.

Their research prominently addresses topics related to psychological well-being and life satisfaction, psychological and temporal perspectives, optimism, hope, and well-being, health disparities and outcomes, mental health research topics, behavioral health and interventions, and aspects of anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Busseri's recent papers include:

  • The happy personality revisited: Re-examining associations between Big Five personality traits and subjective well-being using meta-analytic structural equation modeling, 2023, Journal of Personality
  • The structure of everyday happiness is best captured by a latent subjective well-being factor, 2021, Journal of Research in Personality
  • Happy Days: Resolving the Structure of Daily Subjective Well-Being, Between and Within Individuals, 2022, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • The global belief that "life gets better and better": National differences in recollected past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction around the world, across time, and in relation to societal functioning., 2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • The full life revisited: Examining hedonia and eudaimonia as general orientations, motives for activities, and experiences of wellbeing, 2020, International Journal of Wellbeing

Frequent publication venues for Busseri's research include:

  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Journal of Personality
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • International Journal of Wellbeing

Collaborative work is an aspect of Busseri's research, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Emily M. Erb
  • Andrew Chung
  • Karen M. Arnell
  • Caitlin E. V. Mahy
  • Jordi Quoidbach

Busseri's body of work integrates theoretical models and empirical research methods to explore subjective well-being and personality traits. This includes meta-analytic structural equation modeling as well as investigations into day-to-day happiness and life satisfaction across different populations and temporal frames.

Best Publications

  • A Review of the Tripartite Structure of Subjective Well-Being: Implications for Conceptualization, Operationalization, Analysis, and Synthesis

    Michael A Busseri;Stan W Sadava

  • Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form.

    Michael A. Busseri;John D. Tyler

  • Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact

    Gordon Hodson;Michael A. Busseri

  • A longitudinal examination of breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement and successful development.

    Michael A Busseri;Linda Rose-Krasnor;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers

  • Breadth and Intensity of Youth Activity Involvement as Contexts for Positive Development

    Linda Rose-Krasnor;Michael A. Busseri;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers

  • Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction

    Michael A. Busseri

  • Where Is the Syndrome? Examining Co-Occurrence Among Multiple Problem Behaviors in Adolescence.

    Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers;Michael A. Busseri

  • Self-Objectification, Self-Esteem, and Gender: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model

    Becky L. Choma;Becky L. Choma;Beth A. Visser;Julie A. Pozzebon;Anthony F. Bogaert

  • Assessing the Role of Body Image Coping Strategies as Mediators or Moderators of the Links Between Self-Objectification, Body Shame, and Well-Being

    Becky L. Choma;Becky L. Choma;Claire Shove;Michael A. Busseri;Stanley W. Sadava

  • Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.

    Karen M. Arnell;Marc F. Joanisse;Raymond M. Klein;Michael A. Busseri

  • A HYBRID MODEL FOR RESEARCH ON SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING: EXAMINING COMMON- AND COMPONENT-SPECIFIC SOURCES OF VARIANCE IN LIFE SATISFACTION, POSITIVE AFFECT, AND NEGATIVE AFFECT

    Michael A. Busseri;Stanley W. Sadava;Nancy Decourville

  • Stability and change in adolescent spirituality/religiosity: a person-centered approach.

    Marie Good;Teena Willoughby;Michael A. Busseri

  • Toward a Resolution of the Tripartite Structure of Subjective Well-Being.

    Michael A. Busseri

  • Same-sex attraction and successful adolescent development

    Michael A. Busseri;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers;Anthony R. Bogaert

  • On the association between sexual attraction and adolescent risk behavior involvement: Examining mediation and moderation.

    Michael A. Busseri;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers;Anthony F. Bogaert

  • Improving teamwork: the effect of self-assessment on construction design teams

    Michael A Busseri;Jason M Palmer

  • Breadth and Intensity: Salient, Separable, and Developmentally Significant Dimensions of Structured Youth Activity Involvement.

    Michael A. Busseri;Linda Rose-Krasnor

  • Locus of Control for Consumer Outcomes: Predicting Consumer Behavior1

    Michael A. Busseri;Herbert M. Lefcourt;Robert R. Kerton

  • Functional or Fantasy? Examining the Implications of Subjective Temporal Perspective “Trajectories” for Life Satisfaction

    Michael A. Busseri;Becky L. Choma;Stan W. Sadava

  • “As good as it gets” or “The best is yet to come”? How optimists and pessimists view their past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction

    Michael A. Busseri;Becky L. Choma;Becky L. Choma;Stan W. Sadava

Frequent Co-Authors

Becky L. Choma
Becky L. Choma Toronto Metropolitan University
Linda Rose-Krasnor
Linda Rose-Krasnor Brock University
Teena Willoughby
Teena Willoughby Brock University
Gordon Hodson
Gordon Hodson Brock University
Karen M. Arnell
Karen M. Arnell Brock University
Cheryl M. McCormick
Cheryl M. McCormick Brock University
Anthony F. Bogaert
Anthony F. Bogaert Brock University
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Philip M. Wilson
Philip M. Wilson Brock University
Raymond M. Klein
Raymond M. Klein Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a diverse range of online educational and career pathways, particularly in fields like substance abuse counseling. Many students choose to pursue specialized certifications and licenses to become counselors, helping individuals overcome addiction and related challenges.

Requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor vary by location. For example, those interested in El Paso substance abuse counselor certification requirements will find a set of unique state and city standards. Similarly, candidates should review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Wayne to understand the necessary education, supervised experience, and examination steps.

Other regions also offer clear pathways, such as guidance for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fort Worth and information on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Fremont. These resources are valuable for anyone considering an online psychology degree as they provide region-specific insights into professional advancement and licensure requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Busseri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles