World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karen M. Arnell

Karen M. Arnell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
8581
World Ranking
10354
National Ranking
723

Karen M. Arnell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Arnell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen M. Arnell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Arnell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen M. Arnell is affiliated with Brock University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work encompasses several specialized areas including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their research topics cover a broad range, emphasizing Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Sport Psychology and Performance, Aging and Gerontology Research, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, as well as Neural dynamics and brain function.

Recent publications by Karen M. Arnell include:

  • "Evaluating individual differences in rewarded Stroop performance: reliability and associations with self-report measures" (2022, Psychological Research)
  • "Individual Differences in Attentional Breadth Changes Over Time: An Event-Related Potential Investigation" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Individual differences in naturally occurring affect predict conceptual breadth: evidence for the importance of arousal by valence interactions" (2022, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications)
  • "Between-person variation in naturally occurring affect does not relate to working memory performance: a latent variable modelling study" (2021, Psychological Research)
  • "Naturally occurring affect does not predict hyper-binding across three age groups: Individual difference evidence for hyper-binding not only being shown in older adults" (2022, Journal of Vision)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Arnell include Brent Pitchford, Andrew Chung, and Michael A. Busseri.

Their work has been regularly published in the following venues:

  • Psychological Research
  • Journal of Vision
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Best Publications

  • Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

    Jane E. Raymond;Kimron L. Shapiro;Karen M. Arnell

  • The attentional blink.

    K.L. Shapiro;J.E. Raymond;K.M. Arnell

  • Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation

    Kimron L. Shapiro;Jane E. Raymond;Karen M. Arnell

  • Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.

    Unknown

  • Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP

    Karen M. Arnell;Kassandra V. Killman;David Fijavz

  • The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations.

    Karen M. Arnell;Pierre Jolicœur

  • Similarity determines the attentional blink.

    Jane E. Raymond;Kimron L. Shapiro;Karen M. Arnell

  • Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation

    Karen J. Mathewson;Karen M. Arnell;Craig A. Mansfield

  • Dual-Task Attention Deficits in Dysphoric Mood

    Paul D.q Rokke;Karen M. Arnell;Michelle D. Koch;John T. Andrews

  • Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.

    Karen M. Arnell;Marc F. Joanisse;Raymond M. Klein;Michael A. Busseri

  • Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm

    Mary H. MacLean;Karen M. Arnell

  • Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude

    Mary H. MacLean;Karen M. Arnell;Kimberly A. Cote

  • Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.

    Karen M. Arnell;John Duncan

  • Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures

    Gillian Dale;Karen M. Arnell

  • Reduced Repetition Blindness for One's Own Name

    Karen M. Arnell;Kimron L. Shapiro;Robyn E. Sorensen

  • A conceptual and methodological framework for measuring and modulating the attentional blink

    Mary H. MacLean;Karen M. Arnell

  • Cross-modality attentional blinks without preparatory task-set switching

    Karen M. Arnell;Julie M. Larson

  • Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating effects of arousal

    Jennifer M. Aquino;Karen M. Arnell

  • Dual-task attention deficits in dysphoric mood.

    Unknown

  • Maintaining and Shifting Attention within Left or Right Hemifield

    Rik Vandenberghe;John Duncan;Karen M. Arnell;Sonia J. Bishop

  • Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of target—distractor similarity

    Karen M. Arnell;Ryan Jenkins

  • Blinded by Emotions: Target misses follow attentional capture by arousing distractors in RSVP

    Karen M. Arnell;Kassandra Killman;David Fijavz

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimron L. Shapiro
Kimron L. Shapiro University of Birmingham
Jane E. Raymond
Jane E. Raymond University of Birmingham
Raymond M. Klein
Raymond M. Klein Dalhousie University
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Michael A. Busseri
Michael A. Busseri Brock University
Paul E. Dux
Paul E. Dux University of Queensland
Rosemary Tannock
Rosemary Tannock University of Toronto
John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Catherine J. Mondloch
Catherine J. Mondloch Brock University
Guy A. Orban
Guy A. Orban University of Parma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to various career paths, both within and beyond traditional psychology roles. Many students choose related fields like social work, counseling, or mental health services to make a direct impact in their communities. Each state in the US has specific guidelines for becoming a social worker, and pursuing an online degree can be a flexible way to meet these requirements.

For example, those interested in working in Hawaii should review details about Hawaii social work education requirements to understand the local licensing process. Similarly, if you aim to practice in Idaho, be sure to check out the Idaho social work education requirements.

Interested in Illinois? Learning about becoming a social worker in Illinois can help you identify the essential academic and practical steps. Likewise, those considering Indiana should know how to become a social worker in Indiana.

Completing an accredited online program in psychology or social work can provide the flexibility you need to balance your studies with other responsibilities, while gaining the qualifications required for these rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Karen M. Arnell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles