World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
30
Citations
3817
World Ranking
3522
National Ranking
1362

Thomas Mathew publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Mathew sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 177 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Thomas Mathew D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Mathew sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Thomas Mathew is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on mathematical and statistical methodologies, with a substantial body of work in the field of Mathematics and its subfields including Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Food Science, Economics and Econometrics, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their work spans several specialized topics such as Advanced Statistical Methods and Models, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety, Statistical Methods and Inference, Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring, Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation, and Optimal Experimental Design Methods.

Several papers authored or co-authored by Thomas Mathew highlight their contributions to statistical reference and prediction regions in laboratory medicine, as well as applications of computational methods in engineering contexts. Notable recent works include:

  • "Nonparametric hyperrectangular tolerance and prediction regions for setting multivariate reference regions in laboratory medicine" (2020) published in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
  • "Tolerance limits under zero-inflated lognormal and gamma distributions" (2020) published in Computational and Mathematical Methods
  • "Rectangular tolerance regions and multivariate normal reference regions in laboratory medicine" (2022) published in Biometrical Journal
  • "Rectangular multivariate normal prediction regions for setting reference regions in laboratory medicine" (2022) published in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
  • "Real-time Implementation of Delay Efficient DCT Based Hearing Aid Algorithm Using TMS320C5505 DSP Processor" (2021) published in 2021 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT)

Thomas Mathew has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Ionut Bebu, Soumya Sahu, Dulal K. Bhaumik, Michael Daniel C. Lucagbo, and Derek S. Young. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications across a range of applied and theoretical statistical research areas.

Their scholarly output has appeared repeatedly in certain academic venues, reflecting a focused publication record. Frequent publication venues include the Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, SSRN Electronic Journal, arXiv (Cornell University), Statistical Methods in Medical Research, and Biometrical Journal.

In recognition of their professional contributions, Thomas Mathew was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2001, a distinction awarded within the statistical community for contributions to the discipline.

Best Publications

  • Statistical Tolerance Regions: Theory, Applications, and Computation

    Kalimuthu Krishnamoorthy;Thomas Mathew

  • Inferences on the means of lognormal distributions using generalized p-values and generalized confidence intervals

    K Krishnamoorthy;Thomas Mathew

  • A parametric bootstrap approach for ANOVA with unequal variances: Fixed and random models

    K. Krishnamoorthy;Fei Lu;Thomas Mathew

  • Normal-Based methods for a Gamma Distribution. Prediction and Tolerance Intervals and Stress-Strength Reliability.

    K. Krishnamoorthy;Thomas Mathew;Shubhabrata Mukherjee

  • Statistical Texts for Mixed Linear Models: Khuri/Statistical

    André I. Khuri;Thomas Mathew;Bimal K. Sinha

  • Models and Confidence Intervals for True Values in Interlaboratory Trials

    Hari K Iyer;C. M. Jack Wang;Thomas Mathew

  • Some Tests for Variance Components Using Generalized p Values

    Leping Zhou;Thomas Mathew

  • One-sided tolerance limits in balanced and unbalanced one-way random models based on generalized confidence intervals

    K Krishnamoorthy;Thomas Mathew

  • Generalized confidence intervals for process capability indices

    Thomas Mathew;G. Sebastian;K. M. Kurian

  • Generalized p -values and generalized confidence regions for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem and MANOVA

    Jinadasa Gamage;Thomas Mathew;Samaradasa Weerahandi

  • Optimal designs for binary data under logistic regression

    Thomas Mathew;Bikas Kumar Sinha

  • Generalized p values and confidence intervals for variance components : Applications to army test and evaluation

    Thomas Mathew;David W Webb

  • Tests for individual and population bioequivalence based on generalized p-values.

    Richard J. McNally;Hari Iyer;Thomas Mathew

  • On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data.

    Thomas Mathew;Kenneth Nordstrom

  • A generalized confidence limit for the reliability function of a two-parameter exponential distribution

    Anindya Roy;Thomas Mathew

  • On a generalization to Marshall–Olkin scheme and its application to Burr type XII distribution

    Unknown

  • Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.

    Thomas Mathew;Kenneth Nordström

  • Generalized P-Values and Confidence Intervals: A Novel Approach for Analyzing Lognormally Distributed Exposure Data

    K. Krishnamoorthy;Thomas Mathew;Gurumurthy Ramachandran

  • Model-based imputation approach for data analysis in the presence of non-detects.

    K. Krishnamoorthy;Avishek Mallick;Thomas Mathew

  • Optimum Tests in Unbalanced Two-Way Models without Interaction

    Thomas Mathew;Bimal Kumar Sinha

  • Mathematical tools for applied multivariate analysis

    Thomas Mathew

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Krishnamoorthy
K. Krishnamoorthy University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Brian K. Agan
Brian K. Agan Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Robert D. Gibbons
Robert D. Gibbons University of Chicago
John M. Lachin
John M. Lachin George Washington University
Madan L. Puri
Madan L. Puri Indiana University
Kevin E. Omland
Kevin E. Omland University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Mathematics, several online degree options complement this field well. Many pursue business-oriented degrees to blend analytical skills with practical management expertise. Those considering such a path might explore the easiest mba program to get into, which offers an accessible entry point for professionals seeking flexibility and career growth.

In addition, the easiest mba program provides streamlined coursework suitable for students balancing studies with work or personal commitments. For those aiming for advanced leadership roles, the best 1 year dba program online stands out as an accelerated pathway offering deep expertise in business administration.

Students with an interest in finance might benefit from the master of finance online, a degree focused on financial theory and quantitative analysis, which pairs well with mathematical foundations. Exploring these related degrees can broaden career opportunities in sectors like finance, business strategy, and data-driven decision making.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Mathew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles