World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
6461
World Ranking
7430
National Ranking
2647

Martin A. Locke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Locke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin A. Locke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Locke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin A. Locke is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with extensive work in soil science, environmental chemistry, water science and technology, plant science, and ecology.

The main topics of their research include soil and water nutrient dynamics, hydrology and watershed management studies, soil erosion and sediment transport, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, irrigation practices and water management, hydrology and sediment transport processes, and pesticide and herbicide environmental studies.

Frequent co-authors in their research are Matthew T. Moore, L. Jason Krutz, Ronald L. Bingner, Richard E. Lizotte, and Drew M. Gholson.

They have regularly published in these venues:

  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Journal of Environmental Quality
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Representative publications include:

  • "Trends in Land Use, Irrigation, and Streamflow Alteration in the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain," 2020, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • "Estimating sorption of monovalent acidic herbicides at different pH levels using a single sorption coefficient," 2020, Pest Management Science
  • "Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years," 2020, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • "Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO2 Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)," 2022, Environments
  • "An integrated watershed and water quality modeling system to study lake water quality responses to agricultural management practices," 2023, Environmental Modelling & Software

Best Publications

  • Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems

    Martin A. Locke;Charles T. Bryson

  • Assessing indices for predicting potential nitrogen mineralization in soils under different management systems.

    Harry H. Schomberg;Sirio Wietholter;Timothy S. Griffin;D. Wayne Reeves

  • Weed Management in conservation crop production systems

    Martin A. Locke;Krishna N. Reddy;Robert M. Zablotowicz

  • A Review of effectiveness of vegetative buffers on sediment trapping in agricultural areas

    Yongping Yuan;Ronald L. Bingner;Martin A. Locke

  • Spatial Variability of Soil Properties and Weed Populations in the Mississippi Delta

    L.A. Gaston;M.A. Locke;R.M. Zablotowicz;K.N. Reddy

  • Cover crop, tillage, and herbicide effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield

    Krishna N. Reddy;Robert M. Zablotowicz;Martin A. Locke;Clifford H. Koger

  • The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies

    M. D. Tomer;M. A. Locke

  • Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches.

    M.T. Moore;R. Kröger;M.A. Locke;R.F. Cullum

  • Integrated management of in-field, edge-of-field, and after-field buffers

    Seth M. Dabney;Matthew T. Moore;Martin A. Locke

  • NH4OAc-EDTA-EXTRACTABLE PHOSPHORUS AS A SOIL TEST PROCEDURE

    F. M. Hons;L. A. Larson-Vollmer;M. A. Locke

  • Glutathione-S-Transferase Activity and Metabolism of Glutathione Conjugates by Rhizosphere Bacteria

    R M Zablotowicz;R E Hoagland;M A Locke;W J Hickey

  • Chlorimuron ethyl sorption and desorption kinetics in soils and herbicide-desiccated cover crop residues

    Krishna N. Reddy;Martin A. Locke;Stephen C. Wagner;Robert M. Zablotowicz

  • Evaluating strategies for sustainable intensification of US agriculture through the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research network

    S Spiegal;B T Bestelmeyer;D W Archer;D J Augustine

  • Advancing the sustainability of US agriculture through long-term research

    P. J. A. Kleinman;S. Spiegal;J. R. Rigby;S. C. Goslee

  • Sulfentrazone sorption, desorption, and mineralization in soils from two tillage systems.

    Krishna N. Reddy;Martin A. Locke

  • Chlorimuron Adsorption, Desorption, and Degradation in Soils from Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems

    Krishna N. Reddy;Robert M. Zablotowicz;Martin A. Locke

  • Microbiological characteristics of a vegetative buffer strip soil and degradation and sorption of metolachlor

    W. J. Staddon;W. J. Staddon;M. A. Locke;R. M. Zablotowicz

  • Microbial adaptation for accelerated atrazine mineralization/ degradation in Mississippi Delta soils

    Robert M. Zablotowicz;Mark A. Weaver;Martin A. Locke

  • Sorption-desorption kinetics of alachlor in surface soil from two soybean tillage systems

    Martin A. Locke

  • Mitigation of two pyrethroid insecticides in a Mississippi Delta constructed wetland.

    M T Moore;C M Cooper;S Smith;R F Cullum

  • Evaluating the influence of wetland vegetation on chemical residence time in Mississippi Delta drainage ditches.

    R. Kröger;M.T. Moore;M.A. Locke;R.F. Cullum

Frequent Co-Authors

Krishna N. Reddy
Krishna N. Reddy Agricultural Research Service
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Robert M. Zablotowicz United States Department of Agriculture
Matthew T. Moore
Matthew T. Moore University of Kansas
Charles M. Cooper
Charles M. Cooper Agricultural Research Service
Robert E. Hoagland
Robert E. Hoagland Agricultural Research Service
Peter J. A. Kleinman
Peter J. A. Kleinman Agricultural Research Service
Jean L. Steiner
Jean L. Steiner Agricultural Research Service
C. W. Wood
C. W. Wood Auburn University
David R. Huggins
David R. Huggins Washington State University
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a diverse range of career options, many of which can be enhanced through related online degrees. For students interested in the Earth's physical systems, pursuing geology degrees online provides a solid foundation in understanding natural processes and environmental challenges from a geological perspective.

Another rapidly growing field is geographic data analysis. Environmental professionals often rely on spatial data to solve complex problems, making expertise in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) essential. Exploring the best GIS schools can help students acquire cutting-edge skills in data mapping and environmental monitoring.

Understanding policy and administration is crucial in environmental work. For those aiming to influence environmental governance or work in public sector management, enrolling in one of the 1 year MPA programs offers accelerated pathways to gain leadership and policy-making expertise.

Lastly, the social aspects of environmental issues cannot be overlooked. Combining an Environmental Sciences background with knowledge from online sociology bachelor programs equips students to better understand human behaviors, communities, and social dynamics influencing sustainability efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Martin A. Locke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles