World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
6967
World Ranking
5621
National Ranking
2042

Charles M. Cooper publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Charles M. Cooper D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M. Cooper is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to the subfields of Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Genetics.

Cooper's work covers a range of specialized topics including Geological and Geochemical Analysis, High-pressure Geophysics and Materials, earthquake and tectonic studies, Astro and Planetary Science, Planetary Science and Exploration, Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies, and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping.

Recent publications by Cooper include:

  • Nature Versus Nurture: Preservation and Destruction of Archean Cratons (2021, Tectonics)
  • Episodic Plate Tectonics on Europa: Evidence for Widespread Patches of Mobile-Lid Behavior in the Antijovian Hemisphere (2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)
  • The Growth of Europa's Icy Shell: Convection and Crystallization (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)
  • On the destructive tendencies of cratons (2020, Geology)
  • Late Cretaceous upper-crustal thermal structure of the Sevier hinterland: Implications for the geodynamics of the Nevadaplano (2021, Geosphere)

Frequent publication venues for Cooper include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Tectonics
  • Geology
  • Geosphere
  • Elements

Cooper has worked with the following frequent coauthors:

  • Meghan S. Miller
  • Heather Bedle
  • Carol D. Frost
  • G. C. Collins
  • G. W. Patterson

Best Publications

  • Biological Effects of Agriculturally Derived Surface Water Pollutants on Aquatic Systems—A Review

    C. M. Cooper

  • The Relationship of MSS and TM Digital Data with Suspended Sediments, Chlorophyll, and Temperature in Moon Lake, Mississippi

    Jerry C. Ritchie;Charles M. Cooper;Frank R. Schiebe

  • Mitigation of chlorpyrifos runoff using constructed wetlands

    M.T Moore;R Schulz;C.M Cooper;S Smith

  • Transport and fate of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in an agricultural drainage ditch in the Mississippi Delta, USA

    M.T. Moore;E.R. Bennett;C.M. Cooper;S. Smith

  • Constructed wetlands for mitigation of atrazine-associated agricultural runoff.

    M.T. Moore;J.H. Rodgers;C.M. Cooper;S. Smith

  • Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes

    F. D. Shields;S. S. Knight;C. M. Cooper

  • Experiment in Stream Restoration

    F. Douglas Shields;Charles M. Cooper;Scott S. Knight

  • Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road

    F.Douglas Shields;C.M Cooper;Scott S Knight;M.T Moore

  • Comparison of measured suspended sediment concentrations with suspended sediment concentrations estimated from Landsat MSS data

    Jerry C. Ritchie;Charles M. Cooper

  • Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches.

    M.T. Moore;R. Kröger;M.A. Locke;R.F. Cullum

  • Vegetated agricultural drainage ditches for the mitigation of pyrethroid‐associated runoff

    Erin R. Bennett;Matthew T. Moore;Charles M. Cooper;Sammie Smith

  • Plant senescence: A mechanism for nutrient release in temperate agricultural wetlands

    R. Kröger;M.M. Holland;M.T. Moore;C.M. Cooper

  • Agricultural drainage ditches mitigate phosphorus loads as a function of hydrological variability.

    R. Kröger;M. M. Holland;M. T. Moore;C. M. Cooper

  • Rehabilitation of aquatic habitats in warmwater streams damaged by channel incision in Mississippi

    F. D. Shields;S. S. Knight;C. M. Cooper

  • Vegetative and structural characteristics of agricultural drainages in the Mississippi Delta landscapes.

    J.L. Bouldin;J.L. Farris;M.T. Moore;C.M. Cooper

  • Large Woody Debris Structures for Sand-Bed Channels

    F. Douglas Shields;Nathalie Morin;Charles M. Cooper

  • Hydrological variability and agricultural drainage ditch inorganic nitrogen reduction capacity.

    R. Kröger;M. M. Holland;M. T. Moore;C. M. Cooper

  • Using landsat multispectral scanner data to estimate suspended sediments in Moon Lake, Mississippi

    Jerry C. Ritchie;Charles M. Cooper;Jiang Yongqing

  • The stream channel incision syndrome and water quality.

    F. Douglas Shields;Richard E. Lizotte;Scott S. Knight;Charles M. Cooper

  • Comparative Toxicity of Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos, and Aldicarb to Four Aquatic Testing Organisms

    M. T. Moore;D. B. Huggett;W. B. Gillespie;J. H. Rodgers

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew T. Moore
Matthew T. Moore University of Kansas
F. Douglas Shields
F. Douglas Shields Agricultural Research Service
Jerry C. Ritchie
Jerry C. Ritchie Agricultural Research Service
Martin A. Locke
Martin A. Locke Agricultural Research Service
Ralf Schulz
Ralf Schulz University of Koblenz and Landau
Ken G. Drouillard
Ken G. Drouillard University of Windsor
Peter M. Allen
Peter M. Allen Baylor University
Heinz G. Stefan
Heinz G. Stefan University of Minnesota
Sean J. Bennett
Sean J. Bennett University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Michael J. Benton
Michael J. Benton University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in furthering their education in Environmental Sciences, online doctoral programs offer flexible and diverse options. Many students seek doctoral programs online no dissertation to accelerate their career advancement without the extensive research commitment. This option is especially appealing for working professionals balancing multiple responsibilities.

Another pathway includes eds to edd bridge program, which allows educators and environmental science specialists to transition seamlessly from a master's to a doctoral degree, enhancing their expertise and leadership opportunities in academic or research settings.

Additionally, for those interested in the social impact and policy side of environmental issues, affordable degrees like the dsw program provide crucial skills to work in community-focused roles. These programs emphasize practical approaches to social and environmental challenges.

Lastly, broadening one’s educational scope can be beneficial. The best affordable online general studies degree programs offer foundational knowledge and flexibility for students exploring multiple interests related to environmental sciences and sustainability careers.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Cooper

Recently Published Articles