World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
33
Citations
9463
World Ranking
8171
National Ranking
2707

Peter M. Allen publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Allen sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 89 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Peter M. Allen D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Allen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. Allen is affiliated with Baylor University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as water science and technology, atmospheric science, ecology, environmental engineering, and soil science.

Their main areas of study encompass hydrology and watershed management studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, soil erosion and sediment transport, flood risk assessment and management, precipitation measurement and analysis, hydrological forecasting using artificial intelligence, and geology and paleoclimatology research.

Peter M. Allen has published notable recent papers, including:

  • Enhancing SWAT+ simulation of groundwater flow and groundwater-surface water interactions using MODFLOW routines, 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Development of a Field Scale SWAT+ Modeling Framework for the Contiguous U.S., 2022, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • Conceptual Framework of Connectivity for a National Agroecosystem Model Based on Transport Processes and Management Practices, 2020, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • A Hybrid Artificial Neural Network to Estimate Soil Moisture Using SWAT+ and SMAP Data, 2020, Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
  • Field scale SWAT+ modeling of corn and soybean yields for the contiguous United States: National Agroecosystem Model Development, 2023, Agricultural Systems

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as Environmental Modelling & Software, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Water, Proceedings of the Geologists Association, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Katrin Bieger, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Peter M. Allen;Gilbert Bernhardt

  • AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Peter M. Allen

  • Automated Base Flow Separation and Recession Analysis Techniques

    J. G. Arnold;P. M. Allen;R. Muttiah;G. Bernhardt

  • Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds

    J.G. Arnold;P.M. Allen

  • Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin

    J.G Arnold;R.S Muttiah;R Srinivasan;P.M Allen

  • Introduction to SWAT+, A Completely Restructured Version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool†

    Katrin Bieger;Jeffrey G. Arnold;Hendrik Rathjens;Michael J. White

  • Continental Scale Simulation of the Hydrologic Balance

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Raghavan Srinivasan;Ranjan S. Muttiah;Peter M. Allen

  • Regional estimation of base flow for the conterminous United States by hydrologic landscape regions

    C. Santhi;P.M. Allen;R.S. Muttiah;J.G. Arnold

  • Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance.

    J. G. Arnold;P. M. Allen;M. Volk;J. R. Williams

  • Baseflow simulation using SWAT model in an inland river basin in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China

    Y. Luo;J. Arnold;P. Allen;X. Chen

  • HYDROLOGIC MODEL FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Peter M. Allen;David S. Morgan

  • Estimation of soil cracking and the effect on surface runoff in a Texas Blackland Prairie watershed

    J. G. Arnold;K. N. Potter;K. W. King;P. M. Allen

  • Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation

    M.J. White;C. Santhi;N. Kannan;J.G. Arnold

  • Downstream Channel Geometry for Use in Planning-Level Models

    Peter M. Allen;Jeffrey C. Arnold;Bruce W Byars

  • PREDICTION OF TWO-YEAR PEAK STREAM DISCHARGES USING NEURAL NETWORKS

    Ranjan S. Muttiah;Raghavan Srinivasan;Peter M. Allen

  • Use of Decision Tables to Simulate Management in SWAT

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Katrin Bieger;Michael J. White;Raghavan Srinivasan

  • Development and Evaluation of Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for the Physiographic Regions of the United States

    Katrin Bieger;Hendrik Rathjens;Peter M. Allen;Jeffrey G. Arnold

  • Runoff and soil loss relationships for the Texas Blackland Prairies ecoregion

    R.D. Harmel;C.W. Richardson;K.W. King;P.M. Allen

  • Simulating Landscape Sediment Transport Capacity by Using a Modified SWAT Model.

    Nadia B. Bonumá;Colleen G. Rossi;Jeffrey G. Arnold;José M. Reichert

  • Representing the Connectivity of Upland Areas to Floodplains and Streams in SWAT

    Katrin Bieger;Jeffrey G. Arnold;Hendrik Rathjens;Michael J. White

  • Multifrequency Acoustic Profiling for Water Reservoir Sedimentation Studies

    John A. Dunbar;Peter M. Allen;Paul D. Higley

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey G. Arnold
Jeffrey G. Arnold Agricultural Research Service
Raghavan Srinivasan
Raghavan Srinivasan Texas A&M University
Martin Volk
Martin Volk Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
David D. Bosch
David D. Bosch Agricultural Research Service
Sean J. Bennett
Sean J. Bennett University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Kevin W. King
Kevin W. King Agricultural Research Service
Lee C. Nordt
Lee C. Nordt Baylor University
Steven G. Driese
Steven G. Driese Baylor University
Indrajeet Chaubey
Indrajeet Chaubey University of Connecticut
Esteban G. Jobbágy
Esteban G. Jobbágy National University of San Luis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and diverse career pathways. For veterans seeking flexible learning options, exploring spanish programs online for veterans can provide valuable language skills to complement scientific expertise.

Creative professionals interested in combining science with the arts might consider pursuing an mfa degree online, which can enhance communication and presentation skills essential in environmental education and outreach.

For those aiming to advance into leadership roles within science organizations, an understanding of workforce dynamics can be achieved through the best online masters degree in human resource management programs. This knowledge supports better team management in research and environmental sectors.

Additionally, career changers or retirees exploring new opportunities should review the degrees for seniors to find programs tailored to flexible schedules and lifelong learning aspirations in Earth Science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles