World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8553
World Ranking
5779
National Ranking
386

Martin Volk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Volk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Volk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Volk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Volk is affiliated with the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research spans several interconnected subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Water Science and Technology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Soil Science. This multidisciplinary approach reflects in their varied research topics.

Their work prominently addresses themes such as Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Water Resources Management and Optimization, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics.

Martin Volk has contributed to numerous scientific publications with a consistent presence in well-regarded journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Water
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Remote Sensing
  • Ecology Letters
  • Journal of Applied Ecology

The scientist's recent papers feature a range of topics and publication years, showcasing ongoing research activity:

  • "Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity-Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces" (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • "A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research" (2021, Ecology Letters)
  • "Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade-offs and synergies in grasslands" (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • "Modeling Water Quality in Watersheds: From Here to the Next Generation" (2020, Water Resources Research)
  • "Agriculture and food security under a changing climate: An underestimated challenge" (2022, iScience)

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Martin Volk's career, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Felix Witing
  • Michael Strauch
  • Peter Goethals
  • Marie Anne Eurie Forio
  • Francis J. Burdon

Best Publications

  • Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts, methods and the road ahead

    Anna F. Cord;Bartosz Bartkowski;Michael Beckmann;Andreas Dittrich

  • Introduction to SWAT+, A Completely Restructured Version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool†

    Katrin Bieger;Jeffrey G. Arnold;Hendrik Rathjens;Michael J. White

  • Position paper: Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices

    B. S. McIntosh;J. C. Ascough;M. Twery;J. Chew

  • Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity

    Antje Ullrich;Martin Volk

  • The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation

    Markus Möller;Leo Lymburner;Martin Volk

  • Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales

    Ralf Seppelt;Sven Lautenbach;Martin Volk

  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces

    Angela Lausch;Angela Lausch;Michael E. Schaepman;Andrew K. Skidmore;Sina C. Truckenbrodt

  • Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation

    Michael Strauch;Christian Bernhofer;Sérgio Koide;Martin Volk

  • Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance.

    J. G. Arnold;P. M. Allen;M. Volk;J. R. Williams

  • Towards the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive?: Lessons learned from water quality simulations in an agricultural watershed

    Martin Volk;Stefan Liersch;Gerd Schmidt

  • A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research.

    Alain Maasri;Alain Maasri;Sonja C. Jähnig;Sonja C. Jähnig;Mihai C. Adamescu;Rita Adrian;Rita Adrian

  • A review of multi-criteria optimization techniques for agricultural land use allocation

    Andrea Kaim;Anna F. Cord;Martin Volk

  • Integrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the Upper Ems River Basin

    Martin Volk;Jesko Hirschfeld;Alexandra Dehnhardt;Gerd Schmidt

  • SWAT plant growth modification for improved modeling of perennial vegetation in the tropics

    Michael Strauch;Michael Strauch;Martin Volk

  • Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment

    Sven Lautenbach;Martin Volk;Michael Strauch;Gerald Whittaker

  • The impact of Best Management Practices on simulated streamflow and sediment load in a Central Brazilian catchment.

    Michael Strauch;Michael Strauch;Jorge E.F.W. Lima;Martin Volk;Carsten Lorz

  • Multifunctionality assessments – More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review

    Lisanne Hölting;Michael Beckmann;Martin Volk;Anna F. Cord

  • A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1

    J. Maes;L.C. Braat;K. Jax;M. Hutchins

  • Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

    Sven Lautenbach;Sven Lautenbach;Sven Lautenbach;Anne Christine Mupepele;Carsten F. Dormann;Heera Lee;Heera Lee

  • Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning

    Sacha Gobeyn;Ans M. Mouton;Anna F. Cord;Andrea Kaim

  • Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment

    Rudolf Krönert;Uta Steinhardt;Martin Volk

  • How Can We Make Progress with Decision Support Systems in Landscape and River Basin Management? Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Four Different Decision Support Systems

    Martin Volk;Sven Lautenbach;Hedwig van Delden;Lachlan T. H. Newham

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Anna F. Cord
Anna F. Cord Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
David D. Bosch
David D. Bosch Agricultural Research Service
Dagmar Haase
Dagmar Haase Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Peter Goethals
Peter Goethals Ghent University
Peter M. Allen
Peter M. Allen Baylor University
Jeffrey G. Arnold
Jeffrey G. Arnold Agricultural Research Service
Nicola Fohrer
Nicola Fohrer Kiel University
Sabine Sauvage
Sabine Sauvage Paul Sabatier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related online programs that can enhance your career prospects. For those interested in a specialized track, exploring the cheapest dsw program provides an affordable path to advanced leadership roles in social work, which often intersects with environmental justice issues.

If you prefer a broader academic foundation, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can be a flexible option, blending environmental topics with diverse disciplines to tailor your education to your interests and career goals.

For students seeking a smoother academic journey, consider programs highlighted among the easiest bachelors degree. These programs often prioritize accessibility and manageability while still covering core environmental science concepts.

Additionally, diving deeper into earth sciences through geology degrees online can complement your environmental studies by focusing on earth processes, resource management, and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Volk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles