World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Franz Makeschin

Franz Makeschin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 7079 6803 454 444 129 7483

Franz Makeschin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franz Makeschin between 1979 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franz Makeschin published across 43 years, from 1979 to 2021, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 1 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1979 2021

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franz Makeschin: publications per year, 1979 to 2021
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 7
2004 8
2005 2
2006 4
2007 8
2008 12
2009 14
2010 19
2011 4
2012 9
2013 11
2014 9
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Franz Makeschin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Makeschin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 129
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Franz Makeschin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Makeschin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Franz Makeschin is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work encompasses subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's studies focus notably on topics related to Forest Management and Policy, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, and Forest ecology and management. These thematic areas are consistently reflected in their publication record and collaboration network.

Recent published work includes the paper titled "European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine - Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in Central Germany", published in 2020 in Forest Ecology and Management. This publication has been cited 49 times, indicating recognition within the relevant scientific community.

Frequent co-authors in Franz Makeschin's research include:

  • Florian Achilles
  • Alexander Tischer
  • Markus Bernhardt-Römermann
  • Martin Heinze
  • Frank Reinhardt

Their work is primarily published in Forest Ecology and Management, which is also the main venue for their contributions.

Best Publications

  • An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C

    T. Beck;R.G. Joergensen;E. Kandeler;F. Makeschin

  • A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning

    Lars Koschke;Christine Fürst;Susanne Frank;Franz Makeschin

  • Assessment of landscape aesthetics—Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty

    Susanne Frank;Susanne Frank;Christine Fürst;Lars Koschke;Anke Witt

  • Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador

    Erwin Beck;Jörg Bendix;Ingrid Kottke;Franz Makeschin

  • Land use/land cover change analysis and its impact on soil properties in the northern part of Gadarif region, Sudan

    Khalid Biro;Khalid Biro;Biswajeet Pradhan;Biswajeet Pradhan;Manfred Buchroithner;Franz Makeschin

  • A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics

    Susanne Frank;Christine Fürst;Lars Koschke;Franz Makeschin

  • Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation

    Michael Strauch;Christian Bernhofer;Sérgio Koide;Martin Volk

  • Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. III. Soil ecological effects

    A Jug;F Makeschin;K.E Rehfuess;C Hofmann-Schielle

  • Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem — a Synthesis

    E. Beck;I. Kottke;J. Bendix;F. Makeschin

  • Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Site–growth relationships

    C Hofmann-Schielle;A Jug;F Makeschin;K.E Rehfuess

  • The impact of Best Management Practices on simulated streamflow and sediment load in a Central Brazilian catchment.

    Michael Strauch;Michael Strauch;Jorge E.F.W. Lima;Martin Volk;Carsten Lorz

  • Soil quality degradation processes along a deforestation chronosequence in the Ziwuling area, China

    Shaoshan An;Shaoshan An;Fenli Zheng;Fenli Zheng;Feng Zhang;Feng Zhang;Scott Van Pelt

  • Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. II. Nutritional status and bioelement export by harvested shoot axes

    A Jug;C Hofmann-Schielle;F Makeschin;K.E Rehfuess

  • Cold and hot water–extractable organic matter as indicators of litter decomposition in forest soils

    Dirk Landgraf;Peter Leinweber;Franz Makeschin

  • Impact of litter quality on mineralization processes in managed and abandoned pasture soils in Southern Ecuador

    Karin Potthast;Ute Hamer;Franz Makeschin

  • The Ecosystem (Reserva Biológica San Francisco)

    E. Beck;F. Makeschin;F. Haubrich;M. Richter

  • Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on mycorrhizal formation of two poplar clones (Populus trichocarpa and P. tremula x tremuloides)

    Christel Baum;Franz Makeschin

  • Sediments in urban river basins: identification of sediment sources within the Lago Paranoá catchment, Brasilia DF, Brazil - using the fingerprint approach.

    C. Franz;F. Makeschin;H. Weiß;C. Lorz

  • Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China

    Hui Wang;Shi-Rong Liu;Jiang-Ming Mo;Jing-Xin Wang

  • Chemical soil properties of reclaimed marsh soil from Zhejiang Province P.R. China

    Susanne Iost;Dirk Landgraf;Franz Makeschin

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Volk
Martin Volk Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Harald Vacik
Harald Vacik BOKU University
Thomas Rötzer
Thomas Rötzer Technical University of Munich
Hans Pretzsch
Hans Pretzsch Technical University of Munich
Shaoshan An
Shaoshan An Northwest A&F University
Fenli Zheng
Fenli Zheng Northwest A&F University
Beate Michalzik
Beate Michalzik Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Olaf Kolditz
Olaf Kolditz TU Dresden
Christel Baum
Christel Baum University of Rostock

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring advanced degrees online can offer flexible and affordable options. Many professionals pursue an online edd programs no dissertation to accelerate their education without the added challenge of dissertation requirements. This makes it easier to balance work and study, especially for working adults.

If you're considering educational leadership or administration, the best online eds to edd programs offer seamless pathways to doctoral degrees. These programs often build on existing master’s credentials, making career advancement in education smoother and more accessible.

For those interested in social work careers influenced by environmental and community health, seeking out the cheapest online dsw programs can provide a cost-effective route to a clinical doctorate in social work, enhancing both expertise and impact.

Lastly, students looking for broad interdisciplinary studies might find value in an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This degree offers flexibility and diverse career options, serving as a good foundation for various environmental and sustainability-related roles.

Best Scientists Citing Franz Makeschin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles