World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
30
Citations
7306
World Ranking
9666
National Ranking
578

Beate Michalzik publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Michalzik sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Beate Michalzik D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Michalzik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beate Michalzik is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany, conducting research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work focuses extensively on subfields such as Soil Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Water Science and Technology.

Their research covers several key topics, including:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "Advancing ecohydrology in the 21st century: A convergence of opportunities," 2020, Ecohydrology
  • "European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine - Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in Central Germany," 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Drought and rewetting events enhance nitrate leaching and seepage-mediated translocation of microbes from beech forest soils," 2021, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • "Stemflow Infiltration Hotspots Create Soil Microsites Near Tree Stems in an Unmanaged Mixed Beech Forest," 2021, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • "Nonuniform but highly preferential stemflow routing along bark surfaces and actual smaller infiltration areas than previously assumed: A case study on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.)," 2020, Ecohydrology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Ecohydrology
  • Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
  • Plant and Soil
  • Forests

In addition to journal articles, Beate Michalzik has contributed to book publications, including the title Forest-Water Interactions released by Springer Nature in 2020.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Alexander Tischer
  • Karin Potthast
  • Delphis F. Levia
  • Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses
  • S. Iida

Best Publications

  • Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review.

    Karsten Kalbitz;Stephan Solinger;Ji-Hyung Park;Beate Michalzik

  • Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen - a synthesis for temperate forests

    Beate Michalzik;Karsten Kalbitz;Ji-Hyung Park;Stephan Solinger

  • Dynamics of dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon in a Central European Norway spruce ecosystem

    Beate Michalzik;Egbert Matzner

  • Modelling the production and transport of dissolved organic carbon in forest soils

    Beate Michalzik;Edward Tipping;Jan Mulder;J. F. Gallardo Lancho

  • Factors controlling decomposition rates of fine root litter in temperate forests and grasslands

    Emily F. Solly;Ingo Schöning;Steffen Boch;Ellen Kandeler

  • Effects of an experimental drought on the functioning of a cacao agroforestry system, Sulawesi, Indonesia

    Luitgard Schwendenmann;Edzo Veldkamp;Gerald Moser;Dirk Hölscher

  • Response of cocoa trees (Theobroma cacao) to a 13-month desiccation period in Sulawesi, Indonesia

    G Moser;C Leuschner;D Hertel;D Hölscher

  • Expressing stemflow commensurate with its ecohydrological importance

    Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses;Shin'ichi Iida;Sonja Germer;Pilar Llorens

  • LINKING APHID ECOLOGY WITH NUTRIENT FLUXES IN A CONIFEROUS FOREST

    Unknown

  • Insect herbivores and the nutrient flow from the canopy to the soil in coniferous and deciduous forests.

    Bernhard Stadler;Stephan Solinger;Beate Michalzik

  • Differential stemflow yield from European beech saplings: the role of individual canopy structure metrics

    D. F. Levia;B. Michalzik;K. Näthe;S. Bischoff

  • Controls on soil carbon storage and turnover in German landscapes

    Nadine Herold;Ingo Schöning;Beate Michalzik;Susan E. Trumbore

  • Dissolved organic matter characteristics of deciduous and coniferous forests with variable management: different at the source, aligned in the soil

    Lisa Thieme;Lisa Thieme;Daniel Graeber;Diana Hofmann;Sebastian Bischoff

  • Advancing ecohydrology in the 21st century: A convergence of opportunities

    Andrew J. Guswa;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;John S. Selker;Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses

  • Investigation of gas exchange processes in peat bog ecosystems by means of innovative Raman gas spectroscopy.

    Torsten Frosch;Robert Keiner;Beate Michalzik;Bernhard Fischer

  • Impact of a pine lappet (Dendrolimus pini) mass outbreak on C and N fluxes to the forest floor and soil microbial properties in a Scots pine forest in Germany

    Anne le MellecA. le Mellec;Beate MichalzikB. Michalzik

  • Forest-water interactions

    Delphis F Levia;Darryl Carlyle-Moses;Shin'ichi Iida;Beate Michalzik

  • Carbon input and crop-related changes in microbial biomarker levels strongly affect the turnover and composition of soil organic carbon

    Jana Schmidt;Elke Schulz;Beate Michalzik;Franҫois Buscot

  • Drought and rewetting events enhance nitrate leaching and seepage-mediated translocation of microbes from beech forest soils

    Markus Krüger;Karin Potthast;Beate Michalzik;Beate Michalzik;Alexander Tischer

  • Microbial respiration and natural attenuation of benzene contaminated soils investigated by cavity enhanced Raman multi-gas spectroscopy

    Tobias Jochum;Beate Michalzik;Anne Bachmann;Jürgen Popp;Jürgen Popp

  • The importance of canopy-derived dissolved and particulate organic matter (DOM and POM) – comparing throughfall solutionfrom broadleaved and coniferous forests

    Anne Le Mellec;Henning Meesenburg;Beate Michalzik

  • Raman spectroscopic investigation of 13CO2 labeling and leaf dark respiration of Fagus sylvatica L. (European beech)

    Robert Keiner;Robert Keiner;Marie-Cécile Gruselle;Marie-Cécile Gruselle;Beate Michalzik;Jürgen Popp;Jürgen Popp

  • European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine – Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in Central Germany

    Florian Achilles;Alexander Tischer;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Martin Heinze

  • Importance of canopy herbivores to dissolved and particulate organic matter fluxes to the forest floor

    Beate Michalzik;Bernhard Stadler

Frequent Co-Authors

Delphis F. Levia
Delphis F. Levia University of Delaware
Wolfgang Wilcke
Wolfgang Wilcke Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ingo Schöning
Ingo Schöning Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Jan Siemens
Jan Siemens University of Giessen
Susan E. Trumbore
Susan E. Trumbore Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Egbert Matzner
Egbert Matzner University of Bayreuth
Pilar Llorens
Pilar Llorens Spanish National Research Council
Kirsten Küsel
Kirsten Küsel Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Doerthe Tetzlaff
Doerthe Tetzlaff Leibniz Association
Marion Schrumpf
Marion Schrumpf Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. A one year MPA program offers public administration skills essential for managing environmental policies and community programs. Such degrees emphasize leadership in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Studying a bachelors degree in sociology online complements environmental science by examining social behaviors and community impacts, crucial for addressing environmental justice and policy acceptance.

For educators aiming to specialize in environmental education, pursuing an edd no dissertation program can be advantageous. These programs offer flexibility for professionals balancing work and study, focusing on applied knowledge without the need for a dissertation.

Additionally, eds to edd bridge programs online provide a streamlined path for educators holding an EdS degree to advance to a doctoral level, enhancing expertise in educational leadership within environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Beate Michalzik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles