World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 102 1137 1005 86 79 1100 49467

Jürgen Popp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jürgen Popp between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jürgen Popp published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 45.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 106 publications in 2012. 47 of the 1,532 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 106. Peak 106 publications in 2012. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 41 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 42 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 44 publications 2010: 74 publications 2011: 93 publications 2012: 106 publications 2013: 82 publications 2014: 83 publications 2015: 101 publications 2016: 90 publications 2017: 85 publications 2018: 73 publications 2019: 62 publications 2020: 69 publications 2021: 78 publications 2022: 59 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 75 publications 2025: 45 publications 2026: 2 publications
1993 2026

1,532 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jürgen Popp: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 4
1995 5
1996 7
1997 12
1998 6
1999 11
2000 7
2001 3
2002 13
2003 15
2004 41
2005 17
2006 44
2007 42
2008 27
2009 44
2010 74
2011 93
2012 106
2013 82
2014 83
2015 101
2016 90
2017 85
2018 73
2019 62
2020 69
2021 78
2022 59
2023 55
2024 75
2025 45
2026 2
Total 1,532
Download as CSV

Jürgen Popp publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Popp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,081–1,100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 1,100 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6 1,100
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jürgen Popp D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Popp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105 102
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2012 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

Jürgen Popp is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany. Their research spans a wide range of topics primarily centered on spectroscopy techniques and their applications in biomedical and chemical research. The scientist has contributed extensively to fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Engineering.

Their work encompasses several prominent subfields such as Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Biology, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Specific topics covered in their research include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research, Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses, Biosensors and Analytical Detection, Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing, Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications, Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies, and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging.

Jürgen Popp has authored and co-authored numerous papers, with frequent collaborators including Michael Schmitt, Thomas Bocklitz, Dana Cialla-May, Thomas G. Mayerhöfer, and Tobias Meyer-Zedler. Their publication record is also marked by consistent contributions to several key scientific journals and venues.

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Applied Spectroscopy
  • The Analyst
  • Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
  • Journal of Raman Spectroscopy

Among the selected recent papers are:

  • The Bouguer-Beer-Lambert Law: Shining Light on the Obscure, 2020, ChemPhysChem
  • Chemometric analysis in Raman spectroscopy from experimental design to machine learning-based modeling, 2021, Nature Protocols
  • Deep Learning for Raman Spectroscopy: A Review, 2022, Analytica-A Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Analysis
  • Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: a half-century historical perspective, 2024, Chemical Society Reviews
  • Raman microspectroscopy for microbiology, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers

Jürgen Popp is also an author of a book titled Raman Spectroscopy in Human Health and Biomedicine, published by World Scientific in 2022.

The scientist's contributions have been recognized by professional organizations, including the award of SPIE Fellow in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

    Judith Langer;Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi;Javier Aizpurua;Ramon A. Alvarez-Puebla

  • Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): progress and trends

    Dana Cialla;Anne März;René Böhme;Frank Theil

  • SERS: a versatile tool in chemical and biochemical diagnostics

    Katharina Hering;Dana Cialla;Katrin Ackermann;Thomas Dörfer

  • Recent progress in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for biological and biomedical applications: from cells to clinics

    D. Cialla-May;X.-S. Zheng;K. Weber;K. Weber;J. Popp;J. Popp

  • Raman Spectroscopy—A Prospective Tool in the Life Sciences

    Renate Petry;Renate Petry;Michael Schmitt;Jürgen Popp;Jürgen Popp

  • Sample size planning for classification models.

    Claudia Beleites;Ute Neugebauer;Thomas Bocklitz;Christoph Krafft

  • Tracking heavy water (D2O) incorporation for identifying and sorting active microbial cells

    David Berry;Esther Mader;Tae Kwon Lee;Dagmar Woebken

  • The Bouguer-Beer-Lambert Law: Shining Light on the Obscure.

    Thomas Günter Mayerhöfer;Thomas Günter Mayerhöfer;Susanne Pahlow;Jürgen Popp;Jürgen Popp

  • Vibrational spectroscopy--a powerful tool for the rapid identification of microbial cells at the single-cell level.

    M. Harz;P. Rösch;J. Popp

  • Self‐Healing Polymer Coatings Based on Crosslinked Metallosupramolecular Copolymers

    Stefan Bode;Linda Zedler;Felix H. Schacher;Benjamin Dietzek

  • Chemotaxonomic Identification of Single Bacteria by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy: Application to Clean-Room-Relevant Biological Contaminations

    Petra Rösch;Michaela Harz;Michael Schmitt;Klaus-Dieter Peschke

  • Raman and CARS microspectroscopy of cells and tissues.

    Christoph Krafft;Benjamin Dietzek;Jürgen Popp

  • Isolation and identification of bacteria by means of Raman spectroscopy.

    Susanne Pahlow;Susann Meisel;Dana Cialla-May;Karina Weber

  • How to pre-process Raman spectra for reliable and stable models?

    Thomas Bocklitz;Angela Walter;Katharina Hartmann;Petra Rösch

  • A reproducible surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy approach. Online SERS measurements in a segmented microfluidic system.

    Katrin R Strehle;Dana Cialla;Petra Rösch;Thomas Henkel

  • The application of Raman spectroscopy for the detection and identification of microorganisms

    Stephan Stöckel;Johanna Kirchhoff;Ute Neugebauer;Petra Rösch

  • Micro-Raman spectroscopic identification of bacterial cells of the genus Staphylococcus and dependence on their cultivation conditions

    M. Harz;P. Rösch;K. Peschke;Olaf Ronneberger

  • Chemometric analysis in Raman spectroscopy from experimental design to machine learning-based modeling.

    Shuxia Guo;Shuxia Guo;Shuxia Guo;Jürgen Popp;Jürgen Popp;Thomas Bocklitz;Thomas Bocklitz

  • Structural investigations of copper doped B2O3–Bi2O3 glasses with high bismuth oxide content

    Lucian Baia;Razvan Stefan;Wolfgang Kiefer;Jürgen Popp

  • Raman spectroscopy at the beginning of the twenty-first century

    M. Schmitt;J. Popp

  • Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

    Jürgen Popp;Thomas Mayerhöfer

Frequent Co-Authors

Petra Rösch
Petra Rösch Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Benjamin Dietzek
Benjamin Dietzek Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Christoph Krafft
Christoph Krafft Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology
Wolfgang Kiefer
Wolfgang Kiefer University of Würzburg
Ulrich S. Schubert
Ulrich S. Schubert Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Volker Deckert
Volker Deckert Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Martin D. Hager
Martin D. Hager Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Sebastian Schlücker
Sebastian Schlücker University of Duisburg-Essen
Andreas Tünnermann
Andreas Tünnermann Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Jens Limpert
Jens Limpert Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways for students interested in Chemistry and its applications. For those considering cost factors, understanding how much does it cost to get a criminal justice degree offers insights into budgeting for education, which can be valuable when comparing programs in related fields.

Additionally, students might find best online associates in criminal justice relevant, especially if they are interested in interdisciplinary skills that include analytical thinking and lab work often used in forensic chemistry.

For those leaning towards administrative or legal aspects within the sciences, a paralegal studies associate degree could complement a chemistry background, broadening career opportunities in regulatory or patent law related to pharmaceuticals and chemical inventions.

Careers such as pharmaceutical sales offer dynamic prospects; learning about the pharma sales rep salary and career paths helps students understand potential earnings and growth in this sector, aligning science knowledge with business and communication skills.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Popp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles