World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4856
World Ranking
7588
National Ranking
389

Anna F. Cord publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna F. Cord sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 102 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anna F. Cord D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna F. Cord sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna F. Cord is affiliated with the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany. Their academic work primarily focuses on Environmental Science with a particular emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The main subjects Anna F. Cord addresses in their research include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Forest Management and Policy, and Environmental Conservation and Management.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publications in notable venues, frequently publishing in the SSRN Electronic Journal, Ecosystems and People, Environmental Research Letters, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Anna F. Cord has co-authored extensively with colleagues such as Stephanie Roilo, Michael Beckmann, Jan O. Engler, Frank Wätzold, and Lisanne Hölting.

Recent papers include the following:

  • Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade-offs and synergies in grasslands, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services provision in a degraded ecosystem: A systematic assessment in the Lake Urmia basin, Iran, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Vegetation structure derived from airborne laser scanning to assess species distribution and habitat suitability: The way forward, 2022, Diversity and Distributions
  • Essential ecosystem service variables for monitoring progress towards sustainability, 2022, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • Including stakeholders' perspectives on ecosystem services in multifunctionality assessments, 2020, Ecosystems and People

Best Publications

  • Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts, methods and the road ahead

    Anna F. Cord;Bartosz Bartkowski;Michael Beckmann;Andreas Dittrich

  • Will remote sensing shape the next generation of species distribution models

    Kate S. He;Bethany A. Bradley;Anna F. Cord;Duccio Rocchini

  • glUV: a global UV‐B radiation data set for macroecological studies

    Michael Beckmann;Michael Beckmann;Tomáš Václavík;Ameur M. Manceur;Lenka Šprtová

  • Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives

    Angela Lausch;L Bannehr;Michael Beckmann;Christoph Boehm

  • Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies

    Ilse R. Geijzendorffer;Emmanuelle Cohen-Shacham;Anna F. Cord;Wolfgang Cramer

  • A review of multi-criteria optimization techniques for agricultural land use allocation

    Andrea Kaim;Anna F. Cord;Martin Volk

  • Integrating ecosystem service bundles and socio-environmental conditions – A national scale analysis from Germany

    Andreas Dittrich;Ralf Seppelt;Ralf Seppelt;Tomáš Václavík;Anna F. Cord

  • Modelling the species distribution of flat-headed cats (Prionailurus planiceps), an endangered South-East Asian small felid.

    Andreas Wilting;Anna Cord;Anna Cord;Andrew J. Hearn;Deike Hesse

  • Multifunctionality assessments – More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review

    Lisanne Hölting;Michael Beckmann;Martin Volk;Anna F. Cord

  • Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation

    Anna F. Cord;Kate A. Brauman;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Andreas Huth;Andreas Huth

  • Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade‐offs and synergies in grasslands

    Mario Hanisch;Oliver Schweiger;Anna F. Cord;Anna F. Cord;Martin Volk

  • Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning

    Sacha Gobeyn;Ans M. Mouton;Anna F. Cord;Andrea Kaim

  • Essential ecosystem service variables for monitoring progress towards sustainability

    Unknown

  • Harmonizing Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes

    Ralf Seppelt;Michael Beckmann;Silvia Ceauşu;Anna F. Cord

  • Assessing effects of temporal compositing and varying observation periods for large-area land-cover mapping in semi-arid ecosystems: Implications for global monitoring

    Christian Hüttich;Martin Herold;Martin Wegmann;Anna Cord

  • Measuring ecosystem multifunctionality across scales

    Lisanne Hölting;Sander Jacobs;María R Felipe-Lucia;Joachim Maes

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services provision in a degraded ecosystem: A systematic assessment in the Lake Urmia basin, Iran

    Khadijeh Rahimi Balkanlou;Birgit Müller;Anna F. Cord;Fatemeh Panahi

  • Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history

    Henrik von Wehrden;David James Abson;Michael Beckmann;Anna F. Cord

  • Inclusion of habitat availability in species distribution models through multi-temporal remote-sensing data?

    Anna Cord;Anna Cord;Dennis Rödder

  • Modelling species distributions with remote sensing data: bridging disciplinary perspectives

    Anna F. Cord;Ross K. Meentemeyer;Pedro J. Leitão;Tomáš Václavík

  • Comparing the suitability of classified land cover data and remote sensing variables for modeling distribution patterns of plants

    Anna F. Cord;Doris Klein;Franz Mora;Stefan Dech;Stefan Dech

  • Remote sensing data can improve predictions of species richness by stacked species distribution models: a case study for Mexican pines

    Anna F. Cord;Anna F. Cord;Anna F. Cord;Doris Klein;David S. Gernandt;Jorge A. Pérez de la Rosa

  • Delineating probabilistic species pools in ecology and biogeography

    Dirk Nikolaus Karger;Dirk Nikolaus Karger;Anna F. Cord;Michael Kessler;Holger Kreft

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Stefan Dech
Stefan Dech German Aerospace Center
Martin Volk
Martin Volk Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Martin Wegmann
Martin Wegmann University of Würzburg
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dennis Rödder
Dennis Rödder Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change
Henrik von Wehrden
Henrik von Wehrden Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Bethany A. Bradley
Bethany A. Bradley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Duccio Rocchini
Duccio Rocchini University of Bologna
Andrea Rinaldo
Andrea Rinaldo École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open doors to diverse career pathways adjacent to ecology and evolution. Many professionals choose to extend their impact by gaining expertise in psychology or counseling—fields that often overlap with environmental advocacy, research, or education.

For example, understanding human behavior can be pivotal in environmental policy and conservation. Those interested in forensic applications will find value in discovering how much do forensic psychologists make, uncovering rewarding opportunities that bridge both social and scientific interests.

Learners seeking affordable routes can consider an online child psychology degree or explore the cheapest online master’s in counseling, both of which offer skills relevant to community interventions and public health.

If you want to work in clinical settings or conduct mental health research, accredited clinical psychology master’s programs online offer a flexible way to advance your qualifications. These pathways equip graduates for meaningful societal contributions across research, conservation, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Anna F. Cord

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles