World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
47342
World Ranking
1102
National Ranking
479

Jimmy R. Williams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jimmy R. Williams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 247 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Jimmy R. Williams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jimmy R. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jimmy R. Williams is affiliated with Biogen in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of social sciences and arts and humanities. Their research encompasses a range of subfields including sociology and political science, cultural studies, music, gender studies, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics of Williams' work reflect a strong focus on Asian culture and media studies, music history and culture, digital games and media, social and cultural dynamics, educational games and gamification, gender, feminism, and media, as well as the impact of technology on adolescents.

Williams has published in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Symbolic Interaction
  • IEEE Transactions on Games
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
  • Deviant Behavior
  • International Journal of Cultural Studies

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • "Gender, Gaming Motives, and Genre: Comparing Singaporean, German, and American Players" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Games)
  • "Structuring Knowledge of Subcultural Folk Devils through News Coverage: Social Cognition, Semiotics, and Political Economy" (2025, Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences))
  • "How K-pop Fans Utilize Conventional and Subcultural Frameworks to Construct Fan Identities: A Case Study of Seungri and the Burning Sun Scandal" (2024, Deviant Behavior)
  • "How fan clubs manage the authenticity of fans' identities in Chinese idol culture" (2024, International Journal of Cultural Studies)
  • "The MBTI as a Cultural Meme, Its Diffusion on Chinese Social Media, and Its Significance for Millennials' and Gen-Zs' Selves and Identities" (2025, Symbolic Interaction)

Williams collaborates regularly with several co-authors including:

  • Samuel Judah
  • Mark R. Johnson
  • Rabindra Ratan
  • Vivian Hsueh Hua Chen
  • Frederik De Grove

Their work often explores intersections of culture, identity, and media, especially within Asian contexts and contemporary subcultures. This includes examining how fan communities construct identities, the role of media genres in shaping social understanding, and the diffusion of cultural memes on social media platforms.

Best Publications

  • Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part i: Model Development

    Jeffrey G. Arnold;Raghavan Srinivasan;Ranjan S. Muttiah;J. R. Williams

  • Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009

    S.L. Neitsch;J.G. Arnold;J.R. Kiniry;J.R. Williams

  • Validation of the SWAT Model on a Large River Basin With Point and Nonpoint Sources

    C. Santhi;Jeffrey G. Arnold;Jimmy R. Williams;William A. Dugas

  • A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship Between Erosion and Soil Productivity

    J. R. Williams;C. A. Jones;P. T. Dyke

  • The EPIC model.

    J. R. Williams;V. P. Singh

  • The EPIC crop growth model

    J. R. Williams;C. A. Jones;J. R. Kiniry;D. A. Spanel

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Sediment-yield prediction with Universal Equation using runoff energy factor

    J. R. Williams

  • Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology.

    J R Williams;H D Berndt

  • EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation.

    A. N. Sharpley;J. R. Williams

  • EPIC, Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator

    Andrew N. Sharpley;J. R. Williams

  • Sediment Routing for Agricultural Watersheds

    J. R. Williams

  • EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity

    J. R. Williams;K. G. Renard;P. T. Dyke

  • Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data

    R.C. Izaurralde;J.R. Williams;W.B. McGill;N.J. Rosenberg

  • SWRRB; a basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management.

    J. G. Arnold;J. R. Williams;A. D. Nicks;N. B. Sammons

  • Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins

    J. R. Williams;A. D. Nicks;J. G. Arnold

  • Continuous-time water and sediment-routing model for large basins

    J. G. Arnold;J. R. Williams;D. R. Maidment

  • The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history

    J. R. Williams

  • GEPIC – modelling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale

    Junguo Liu;Jimmy R. Williams;Alexander J.B. Zehnder;Hong Yang

  • Flood Routing With Variable Travel Time or Variable Storage Coefficients

    Jimmy R. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Kiniry
James R. Kiniry Agricultural Research Service
Jeffrey G. Arnold
Jeffrey G. Arnold Agricultural Research Service
Philip W. Gassman
Philip W. Gassman Iowa State University
Roberto C. Izaurralde
Roberto C. Izaurralde University of Maryland, College Park
Brian Nolan
Brian Nolan University of Oxford
Christopher T. Whelan
Christopher T. Whelan University College Dublin
Raghavan Srinivasan
Raghavan Srinivasan Texas A&M University
Richard Layte
Richard Layte Trinity College Dublin
Allison M. Thomson
Allison M. Thomson University of Maryland, College Park
Hong Yang
Hong Yang Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online programs offer valuable interdisciplinary skills. Exploring an online sociology bachelor programs can complement environmental studies by providing a deeper understanding of social behaviors and community impact, which is crucial for effective sustainability initiatives.

Graduate students looking for flexible advanced degrees may consider an array of online doctoral programs without dissertation. These options accommodate professionals aiming to elevate their expertise while balancing other commitments, accelerating their journey towards leadership roles in environmental policy and education.

Additionally, those in education-focused careers within environmental sciences might find value in eds to edd programs online. These pathways help educators transition to higher-level administrative or research positions without the need to pause their professional work.

Finally, pursuing a dsw online programs offers a unique angle on managing community health and welfare, areas often impacted by environmental changes. Social work expertise is increasingly vital in crafting responsive and resilient community strategies in environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Jimmy R. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles