World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
8986
World Ranking
8437
National Ranking
387

Jochen Musch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Musch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jochen Musch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Musch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jochen Musch is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research spans primarily the fields of Mathematics and Computer Science, with notable contributions in subfields such as Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, and Literature and Literary Theory.

The main topics covered by their work include Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Media Influence and Health, and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse.

Among their frequently published venues are PLoS ONE, where they have four publications, Behavior Research Methods with three publications, Acta Psychologica, Sociological Methods & Research, and Consciousness and Cognition.

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on survey methodology and techniques to improve data validity and detect cheating or bias in sensitive surveys. These works include:

  • Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • On the validity of non-randomized response techniques: an experimental comparison of the crosswise model and the triangular model, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • How explicit warnings reduce the truth effect: A multinomial modeling approach, 2020, Acta Psychologica
  • A New Approach to Detecting Cheating in Sensitive Surveys: The Cheating Detection Triangular Model, 2022, Sociological Methods & Research

Their frequent co-authors include Julia Meisters, Adrian Hoffmann, Frank Calio, Lena Nadarevic, and Tim Angelike, indicating ongoing collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development: A Review of the Relative Age Effect in Sport☆

    Jochen Musch;Simon Grondin

  • Affective priming: Findings and theories.

    Karl Christoph Klauer;Jochen Musch

  • Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research.

    Frederik Aust;Birk Diedenhofen;Sebastian Ullrich;Jochen Musch

  • The Psychology of Evaluation : Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion

    Jochen Musch;Karl Christoph Klauer

  • On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.

    Karl Christoph Klauer;Jochen Musch;Birgit Naumer

  • A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes

    Jan De Houwer;J. Musch;K. C. Klauer

  • Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.

    Joachim Stöber;Dorothea E. Dette;Jochen Musch

  • List context effects in evaluative priming

    KC Klauer;Christian Stamov Rossnagel;J Musch

  • A Brief History of Web Experimenting

    Jochen Musch;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • The Relative Age Effect in Soccer: Cross-Cultural Evidence for a Systematic Discrimination against Children Born Late in the Competition Year

    Jochen Musch;Roy Hay

  • Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit

    Jochen Musch;Robbi Brockhaus;Arndt Bröder

  • A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance.

    Morten Moshagen;Jochen Musch;Anja S. Göritz

  • Test anxiety versus academic skills: a comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam

    Jochen Musch;Arndt Broder

  • Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal

    Jochen Musch;Katja Ehrenberg

  • HINDSIGHT BIAS: ON BEING WISE AFTER THE EVENT

    Hartmut Blank;Jochen Musch;Rüdiger F. Pohl

  • No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters !

    Axel Buchner;Raoul Bell;Bettina Mehl;Jochen Musch

  • Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task.

    Karl Christoph Klauer;Jochen Musch

  • Sample Size Requirements of the Robust Weighted Least Squares Estimator

    Morten Moshagen;Morten Moshagen;Jochen Musch

  • Goal-Dependent and Goal-Independent Effects of Irrelevant Evaluations

    Karl Christoph Klauerxy;Jochen Musch

  • A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes towards foreigners

    Martin Ostapczuk;Jochen Musch;Morten Moshagen

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl Christoph Klauer
Karl Christoph Klauer University of Freiburg
Morten Moshagen
Morten Moshagen University of Ulm
Ulf-Dietrich Reips
Ulf-Dietrich Reips University of Konstanz
Reinhard Pietrowsky
Reinhard Pietrowsky Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Raoul Bell
Raoul Bell Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Klaus Oberauer
Klaus Oberauer University of Zurich
Edgar Erdfelder
Edgar Erdfelder University of Mannheim
Axel Buchner
Axel Buchner Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Simon Grondin
Simon Grondin Université Laval
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in psychology or counseling, choosing the right degree program is crucial. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer online degrees in psychology and counseling, providing flexibility and accessibility for students with diverse needs. The demand for mental health professionals continues to rise, opening up rewarding career pathways in schools, hospitals, private practice, and community organizations.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. If you're looking for budget-friendly options, explore these lists of affordable counseling degrees in New Orleans, affordable counseling programs in New Jersey, and affordable counseling programs in New York. These resources highlight programs that balance quality education and cost, making it easier to begin your journey toward a counseling career. You can also check out the cheapest counseling programs in Ohio for more affordable choices in the Midwest.

By exploring related online degrees and understanding the range of career pathways available, you’ll be better equipped to make informed decisions about your future in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen Musch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles