World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
8971
World Ranking
7193
National Ranking
422

Stephen Cobley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Cobley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen Cobley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Cobley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport.

    Stephen Cobley;Joseph Baker;Nick Wattie;Jim McKenna

  • Psychological consequences of childhood obesity: psychiatric comorbidity and prevention

    Jean Rankin;Lynsay Matthews;Stephen Cobley;Ahreum Han

  • What do we know about early sport specialization? Not much!

    Joseph Baker;Stephen Cobley;Jessica Fraser‐Thomas

  • Influences of competition level, gender, player nationality, career stage and playing position on relative age effects.

    J. Schorer;S. Cobley;D. Büsch;H. Bräutigam

  • Childhood obesity and its physical and psychological co-morbidities: a systematic review of Australian children and adolescents

    Ross H. Sanders;Ahreum Han;Julien S. Baker;Stephen Cobley

  • Towards a unified understanding of relative age effects

    Nick Wattie;Stephen Cobley;Joseph Baker

  • Stressors, coping, and coping effectiveness: Gender, type of sport, and skill differences

    Adam R. Nicholls;Remco Polman;Andrew R. Levy;Jamie Taylor

  • Soccer Player Characteristics in English Lower-League Development Programmes: The Relationships between Relative Age, Maturation, Anthropometry and Physical Fitness.

    Ric Lovell;Christopher Towlson;Guy Parkin;Matthew Portas

  • The prevalence, influential factors and mechanisms of relative age effects in UK Rugby League.

    K. Till;S. Cobley;N. Wattie;J. O'Hara

  • Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Kristy L. Smith;Patricia L. Weir;Kevin Till;Michael Romann

  • The Effectiveness of Dance Interventions on Physical Health Outcomes Compared to Other Forms of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Alycia Fong Yan;Stephen Cobley;Cliffton Chan;Evangelos Pappas

  • Relative age effects in professional German soccer: A historical analysis

    Stephen P. Cobley;Joerg Schorer;Joseph Baker

  • The efficacy of injury prevention programs in adolescent team sports: a meta-analysis

    Najeebullah Soomro;Ross Sanders;Daniel Hackett;Tate Hubka

  • Effectiveness of exercise intervention on improving fundamental movement skills and motor coordination in overweight/obese children and adolescents: A systematic review.

    Ahreum Han;Allan Fu;Stephen Cobley;Ross H. Sanders

  • Considering maturation status and relative age in the longitudinal evaluation of junior rugby league players

    K. Till;S. Cobley;J. O' Hara;Carlton Cooke

  • Relative age effects in athletic sprinting and corrective adjustments as a solution for their removal.

    Michael Romann;Stephen Cobley

  • Routledge Handbook of Talent Identification and Development in Sport

    Joseph Baker;Stephen Cobley;Jörg Schorer;Nick Wattie

  • Muscle Dysmorphia Symptomatology and Associated Psychological Features in Bodybuilders and Non-Bodybuilder Resistance Trainers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Lachlan Mitchell;Stuart B. Murray;Stephen Cobley;Daniel Hackett

  • Relative age effects

    Joseph Baker;Jörg Schorer;Stephen Cobley

  • Variations in relative age effects in individual sports: Skiing, figure skating and gymnastics

    Joseph Baker;Christina Janning;Harmonie Wong;Stephen Cobley

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Baker
Joseph Baker University of Toronto
Jörg Schorer
Jörg Schorer Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Jim McKenna
Jim McKenna Leeds Beckett University
Robert Adams
Robert Adams Flinders University
Remco Polman
Remco Polman Queensland University of Technology
Adam R. Nicholls
Adam R. Nicholls University of Hull
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew W. Howard
Andrew W. Howard California Institute of Technology
Robert O. Deaner
Robert O. Deaner Grand Valley State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Cobley

Recently Published Articles