World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulf-Dietrich Reips

Ulf-Dietrich Reips

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
11252
World Ranking
7163
National Ranking
239

Ulf-Dietrich Reips publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf-Dietrich Reips sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ulf-Dietrich Reips D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf-Dietrich Reips sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulf-Dietrich Reips is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans 38 published studies across various subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, clinical psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and sociology and political science.

Their research addresses a range of topics, notably mental health research, behavioral health and interventions, digital mental health interventions, and image and video quality assessment. Other focus areas include COVID-19 and mental health, family and patient care in intensive care units, and cognitive disorders related to intensive care units.

Reips has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Web-Based Research in Psychology: A Review" (2021, KOPS, University of Konstanz)
  • "Smartphone sensor accuracy varies from device to device in mobile research: The case of spatial orientation" (2020, Behavior Research Methods)
  • "Geofencing in location-based behavioral research: Methodology, challenges, and implementation" (2023, Behavior Research Methods)
  • "Large-Scale Crowdsourced Subjective Assessment of Picturewise Just Noticeable Difference" (2022, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology)
  • "Samply: A user-friendly smartphone app and web-based means of scheduling and sending mobile notifications for experience-sampling research" (2021, Behavior Research Methods)

Most of Reips's published work appears in academic journals such as Behavior Research Methods, PLoS ONE, Journal of Perceptual Imaging, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, and BMC Primary Care, with Behavior Research Methods being the most frequent venue for publication.

Their collaborative network includes multiple coauthors with repeated partnerships. Frequent coauthors include Yury Shevchenko, Robert P. Kosilek, Linda Sanftenberg, Maggie Schauer, and Thomas Elbert, with several joint publications across various projects.

Best Publications

  • Standards for Internet-based experimenting.

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • The Web Experiment Method : advantages, disadvantages, and solutions

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • "Big Data" : big gaps of knowledge in the field of internet science

    Chris Snijders;Uwe Matzat;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online

    Adam N. Joinson;Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Tom Buchanan;Carina B. Paine Schofield

  • Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet

    Tom Buchanan;Carina Paine;Adam N. Joinson;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Frederik Funke

  • Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology

    Adam Joinson;Katelyn McKenna;Tom Postmes;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Internet users' perceptions of 'privacy concerns' and 'privacy actions'

    Carina Paine;Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Stefan Stieger;Adam Joinson

  • Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Drop Out in Online Studies

    Andrea Frick;Marie-Thérèse Bächtiger;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Measuring self-disclosure online

    Adam N. Joinson;Carina Paine;Tom Buchanan;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys

    Adam N. Joinson;Alan Woodley;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Dimensions of Internet science

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Michael Bosnjak

  • Personalized salutation, power of sender and response rates to Web-based surveys

    Adam N. Joinson;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Migration and Diaspora in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies

    Pedro J. Oiarzabal;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Why semantic differentials in web-based research should be made from visual analogue scales and not from 5-point scales

    Frederik Funke;Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: A paradata collection tool and an empirical study

    Stefan Stieger;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality

    Friedrich M. Götz;Friedrich M. Götz;Stefan Stieger;Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • WEXTOR: a Web-based tool for generating and visualizing experimental designs and procedures.

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Christoph Neuhaus

  • The Web Experimental Psychology Lab : five years of data collection on the Internet

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips

  • Forced-response in online surveys: Bias from reactance and an increase in sex-specific dropout

    Stefan Stieger;Ulf-Dietrich Reips;Martin Voracek

  • Internet-Based Psychological Experimenting

    Ulf-Dietrich Reips

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Adam Joinson
Adam Joinson University of Bath
Thomas A. Buchanan
Thomas A. Buchanan University of Southern California
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Anja S. Göritz
Anja S. Göritz University of Freiburg
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
Michael Cunningham
Michael Cunningham University of Louisville
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA can open doors to diverse career opportunities across many industries. Many students opt to broaden their skillsets and enhance employability with related programs and credentials, accessible through flexible online learning formats.

For those drawn to business and finance, consider enrolling in an accelerated online finance degree to gain strong analytical and quantitative skills. Graduates looking to fast-track their management careers may benefit from fast track MBA programs that compress content into shorter timelines for early advancement.

Some engineering and tech professionals choose to supplement their careers with legal expertise. Comprehensive online paralegal programs can help you enter the legal field or assist with technology-focused legal issues. For those interested in accounting, the best online bookkeeping certificate programs provide foundational knowledge essential for finance-related roles within tech organizations.

Exploring these related online degrees and certifications can help you diversify your expertise, stay competitive, and pursue various career pathways aligned with evolving industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf-Dietrich Reips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles