World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
13180
World Ranking
3548
National Ranking
1997

Daniel M. Bolt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Bolt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel M. Bolt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Bolt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel M. Bolt is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a focus on various subfields including management science and operations research, clinical psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, such as psychometric methodologies and testing, smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health and interventions, family and disability support research, autism spectrum disorder research, mental health research topics, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Frequent publication venues for Daniel M. Bolt include Psychometrika, Addiction, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Clinical Psychological Science, and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Daniel M. Bolt are:

  • Timothy B. Baker
  • Michael C. Fiore
  • Stevens S. Smith
  • Megan E. Piper
  • Douglas E. Jorenby

Recent significant papers by Daniel M. Bolt and collaborators include:

  • Testing the Efficacy of a Multicomponent, Self-Guided, Smartphone-Based Meditation App: Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • Data Missing Not at Random in Mobile Health Research: Assessment of the Problem and a Case for Sensitivity Analyses, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Effects of Combined Varenicline With Nicotine Patch and of Extended Treatment Duration on Smoking Cessation, 2021, JAMA
  • Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design to adapt an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with diabetes: the mixed data integration process, 2021, Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
  • The Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination with Mortality Among 86,732 Hospitalized Patients: Subpopulations, Patient Factors, and Changes over Time, 2023, Journal of General Internal Medicine

Best Publications

  • The relative risk and timing of divorce in families of children with an autism spectrum disorder.

    Sigan L. Hartley;Erin T. Barker;Marsha Mailick Seltzer;Frank Floyd

  • Change in autism symptoms and maladaptive behaviors in adolescents and adults with an autism spectrum disorder.

    Paul T. Shattuck;Marsha Mailick Seltzer;Jan S. Greenberg;Gael I. Orsmond

  • Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: Implications for nicotine dependence

    Timothy B. Baker;Megan E. Piper;Danielle E. McCarthy;Daniel M. Bolt

  • A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

    Megan E. Piper;Thomas M. Piasecki;E. Belle Federman;Daniel M. Bolt

  • Therapist effects in psychotherapy: A random-effects modeling of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data

    Dong-Min Kim;Bruce E. Wampold;Daniel M. Bolt

  • A multigroup item response theory analysis of the psychopathy checklist--revised.

    Daniel M. Bolt;Robert D. Hare;Jennifer E. Vitale;Joseph P. Newman

  • Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking

    Albert C. Gunther;Daniel Bolt;Dina L. G. Borzekowski;Janice L. Liebhart

  • Estimation of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Multidimensional Item Response Models Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo

    Daniel M. Bolt;Venessa F. Lall

  • A Mixture Model Analysis of Differential Item Functioning

    Allan S. Cohen;Daniel M. Bolt

  • Item Parameter Estimation Under Conditions of Test Speededness: Application of a Mixture Rasch Model With Ordinal Constraints

    Daniel M. Bolt;Allan S. Cohen;James A. Wollack

  • A Comparison of Alternative Models for Testlets

    Yanmei Li;Daniel M. Bolt;Jianbin Fu

  • Development of the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives

    Stevens S. Smith;Megan E. Piper;Daniel M. Bolt;Michael C. Fiore

  • Gender, race, and education differences in abstinence rates among participants in two randomized smoking cessation trials

    Megan E. Piper;Jessica W. Cook;Tanya R. Schlam;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Effects of Nicotine Patch vs Varenicline vs Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Smoking Cessation at 26 Weeks: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Timothy B. Baker;Megan E. Piper;James H. Stein;Stevens S. Smith

  • A Monte Carlo Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Polytomous DIF Detection Methods.

    Daniel M. Bolt

  • Randomized Evaluation of Peer Support Arrangements to Support the Inclusion of High School Students With Severe Disabilities

    Erik W. Carter;Jennifer Asmus;Colleen K. Moss;Elizabeth E. Biggs

  • Addressing Score Bias and Differential Item Functioning Due to Individual Differences in Response Style

    Daniel M. Bolt;Timothy R. Johnson

  • Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere).

    Deborah Lowe Vandell;David J. Shernoff;Kim M. Pierce;Daniel M. Bolt

  • A Mixture Item Response Model for Multiple-Choice Data.

    Daniel M. Bolt;Allan S. Cohen;James A. Wollack

  • Specific Features of After-School Program Quality: Associations with Children's Functioning in Middle Childhood

    Kim M. Pierce;Daniel M. Bolt;Deborah Lowe Vandell

  • Effect of technology-enhanced continuous progress monitoring on math achievement

    Jim Ysseldyke;Daniel M. Bolt

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael C. Fiore
Michael C. Fiore University of Wisconsin–Madison
Wei-Yin Loh
Wei-Yin Loh University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University
Sigan L. Hartley
Sigan L. Hartley University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
B. Bradford Brown
B. Bradford Brown University of Wisconsin–Madison
Deborah Lowe Vandell
Deborah Lowe Vandell University of California, Irvine
Christopher M. Murphy
Christopher M. Murphy University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open up a variety of fulfilling career paths, especially as the demand grows for licensed counseling professionals across the United States. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees, allowing students to balance studies with work or family commitments while preparing for licensure.

Aspiring therapists must understand that licensing requirements can vary greatly by location. For example, those interested in learning how to become a licensed therapist in Chesapeake will need to follow Virginia’s specific education and supervised experience guidelines. Similarly, the Chicago licensed therapist education requirements differ from those in other states.

West Coast students might be researching how to become a licensed therapist in Chula Vista, which involves unique state-level courses and clinical hours. In the Midwest, understanding the Cincinnati licensed therapist requirements is crucial for those planning a counseling career in Ohio.

When choosing an online psychology program, review curriculum details to ensure they align with your state’s licensing needs. This proactive step can streamline your path toward a meaningful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Bolt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles