World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Eulogio García publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eulogio García sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eulogio García D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eulogio García sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eulogio García is affiliated with Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with an emphasis on subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Genetics.

Their work encompasses a range of main topics including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies
  • Vascular Anomalies and Treatments

Among the recent papers associated with Eulogio García are:

  • "Valor adicional de la tecnología híbrida de PET/RM frente a la RM y la PET en la enfermedad cardiovascular" (2020) published in Revista Española de Cardiología
  • "Additional value of hybrid PET/MR imaging versus MR or PET performed separately to assess cardiovascular disease" (2020) published in Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
  • "Tratamiento percutáneo de seudoaneurisma aórtico tras el TAVI" (2020) published in Revista Española de Cardiología
  • "Changes in acute coronary syndrome in a decade in a provincial referral hospital" (2020) published in Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)
  • "Percutaneous repair of TAVI induced aortic pseudoaneurysm" (2020) published in Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with García include Leticia Fernández-Friera, Leire Unzué, Andrea Moreno-Arciniegas, Leydimar Anmad Shihadeh, and Patricia Barrio.

The prevalent publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Revista Española de Cardiología
  • Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
  • European Heart Journal - Case Reports
  • Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)
  • Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports

Best Publications

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review

    W D Weaver;R J Simes;A Betriu;C L Grines

  • Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)

    Joachim Schofer;Michael Schlüter;Anthony H Gershlick;William Wijns

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)

    Patrick W. Serruys;Ben Van Hout;Hans Bonnier;Victor Legrand

  • Normal Flow (TIMI-3) Before Mechanical Reperfusion Therapy Is an Independent Determinant of Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction Analysis From the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials

    Gregg W. Stone;David Cox;Eulogio Garcia;Bruce R. Brodie

  • Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score.

    Amir Halkin;Mandeep Singh;Eugenia Nikolsky;Cindy L. Grines

  • Impact of Renal Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    H. Mehrdad Sadeghi;Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;Roxana Mehran

  • Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Kóppen (para adaptarlos a condiciones de la República mexicana)

    E García;E.A. Garcia-Zepeda;EG García-Mayor;de la Torre M García

  • Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early ( 4 h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

    Felix Zijlstra;A. Patel;M. Jones;C. L. Grines

  • Rotational Atherectomy Does Not Reduce Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis Results of the Angioplasty Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Treatment of Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Trial (ARTIST)

    Juergen vom Dahl;Ulrich Dietz;Philipp K. Haager;Sigmund Silber

  • Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial.

    Eugenia Nikolsky;Eve D. Aymong;Amir Halkin;Cindy L. Grines

  • Regional diastolic function in ischaemic heart disease using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging.

    M A García-Fernández;J Azevedo;M Moreno;J Bermejo

  • Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Results From a Large Multicenter Registry

    Ignacio J. Amat-Santos;David Messika-Zeitoun;Helene Eltchaninoff;Samir Kapadia

  • Gender Differences in Outcomes After Primary Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting With and Without Abciximab for Acute Myocardial Infarction Results of the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial

    Alexandra J. Lansky;Cody Pietras;Ricardo A. Costa;Yoshihiro Tsuchiya

  • Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial.

    Michael G. Mclaughlin;Gregg W. Stone;T. Eve Aymong;Graham Gardner

  • Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.

    Paul Sorajja;Bernard J. Gersh;Costantino Costantini;Michael G. McLaughlin

  • Frequency, correlates, and clinical implications of myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty and stenting, with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, in acute myocardial infarction

    Costantino O. Costantini;Gregg W. Stone;Roxana Mehran;Eve Aymong

  • Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-up.

    Amadeo Betriu;Monica Masotti;Antoni Serra;Joaquin Alonso

  • Comparison of Primary Coronary Angioplasty and Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Quantitative Review

    W. Douglas Weaver;R. John Simes;Amadeo Betriu;Cindy L. Grines

Frequent Co-Authors

Cindy L. Grines
Cindy L. Grines Wayne State University
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
James E. Tcheng
James E. Tcheng Duke University
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Giulio Guagliumi
Giulio Guagliumi ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
Carlos Macaya
Carlos Macaya Complutense University of Madrid
Jose Lopez-Sendon
Jose Lopez-Sendon Hospital Universitario La Paz
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA often means more than just attending medical school. If you're exploring alternative or supportive roles in healthcare, there are numerous accredited online degrees and bridge programs available.

Registered nurses (RNs) looking to advance can consider online rn to bsn programs without clinicals or transition further with adn to fnp programs, allowing for greater flexibility and career growth. Those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can explore which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure their degree is recognized and respected in the field.

Nutrition is another vital aspect of medicine. A nutrition bachelor degree online can open opportunities for work in clinical and community settings. These online pathways offer flexible, accredited options for those eager to make an impact in patient care, healthcare management, or wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Eulogio García

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles