World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 122 483 459 282 265 812 81163
Medicine 124 3156 2944 1742 1603 811 82305

Cindy L. Grines publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cindy L. Grines between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cindy L. Grines published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2003. 14 of the 849 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2003. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 38 publications 1996: 27 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 46 publications 2003: 57 publications 2004: 48 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

849 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cindy L. Grines: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 4
1990 11
1991 14
1992 5
1993 5
1994 12
1995 38
1996 27
1997 14
1998 18
1999 10
2000 16
2001 20
2002 46
2003 57
2004 48
2005 29
2006 19
2007 25
2008 17
2009 11
2010 15
2011 16
2012 10
2013 12
2014 22
2015 25
2016 41
2017 32
2018 31
2019 33
2020 30
2021 40
2022 39
2023 25
2024 11
2025 13
2026 1
Total 849
Download as CSV

Cindy L. Grines publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy L. Grines sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 811 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 811
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Cindy L. Grines D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy L. Grines sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 124
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Cindy L. Grines is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of medicine, with extensive contributions to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Within this area, Cindy L. Grines has worked on topics including coronary interventions and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, mechanical circulatory support devices, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, and cardiac valve diseases and treatments.

The scientist has published a significant number of papers in several leading cardiovascular journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Some recent notable publications by Cindy L. Grines are:

  • SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Initial Findings From the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction Registry, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Management of acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in Patients With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in cardiovascular medicine. Regular co-authors include Mir B. Basir, Timothy D. Henry, Jeffrey W. Moses, William W. O'Neill, and Alexandra J. Lansky.

Cindy L. Grines has contributed to advancing knowledge in multiple subfields of study such as surgery, biomedical engineering, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Best Publications

  • Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.

    Elliott Antman;Jean-Pierre Bassand;Werner Klein;Magnus Ohman

  • Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review of 23 randomised trials

    Ellen C Keeley;Judith A Boura;Cindy L Grines

  • Effect of Intensive Compared With Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Steven E. Nissen;E. Murat Tuzcu;Paul Schoenhagen;B. Greg Brown

  • A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

    C L Grines;K F Browne;J Marco;D Rothbaum

  • Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction

    J. S. Alpert;E. Antman;F. Apple;P. W. Armstrong

  • Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial.

    Steven E. Nissen;Taro Tsunoda;E. Murat Tuzcu;Paul Schoenhagen

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review

    W D Weaver;R J Simes;A Betriu;C L Grines

  • Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    James A. Goldstein;Demetris Demetriou;Cindy L. Grines;Mark Pica

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

    James J Ferguson;Robert M Califf;Elliott M Antman;Marc Cohen

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association

    Laxmi S. Mehta;Theresa M. Beckie;Holli A. DeVon;Cindy L. Grines

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease.

    Steven Nissen;John C. Gurley;Cindy L. Grines;David C. Booth

  • Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization.

    E J Topol;D J Moliterno;H C Herrmann;E R Powers

  • SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019

    David A. Baran;Cindy L. Grines;Steven Bailey;Daniel Burkhoff

  • Angiogenic Gene Therapy (AGENT) Trial in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

    Cindy L. Grines;Matthew W. Watkins;Greg Helmer;William Penny

  • Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials

    Ellen C Keeley;Judith A Boura;Cindy L Grines

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. O'Neill
William W. O'Neill University of Miami
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
James E. Tcheng
James E. Tcheng Duke University
Eulogio García
Eulogio García Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
Giulio Guagliumi
Giulio Guagliumi ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to an MD. There are a variety of online programs and alternative career pathways in healthcare that offer flexibility, accelerated timelines, and broad impact.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical levels, easiest dnp programs provide a flexible online route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, helping advance leadership skills without disrupting your career. Those interested in starting their medical journey quickly might consider fast track medical programs, which are designed to help you become a licensed practical nurse rapidly.

Mental health fields are also growing rapidly. Students can enroll in specialized online pmhnp programs to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. Additionally, those drawn to administration can make a difference in healthcare operations alongside clinical professionals by earning a healthcare administration degree online.

These pathways can help you join the healthcare workforce faster and with schedule-friendly options, while opening doors to a variety of rewarding roles beyond traditional medical school routes.

Best Scientists Citing Cindy L. Grines

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles