World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 52 3778 3565 441 419 109 12841

Ruth Newbury-Ecob publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth Newbury-Ecob between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth Newbury-Ecob published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 4 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1989 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth Newbury-Ecob: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 4
1994 3
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 7
2006 8
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 5
2011 6
2012 6
2013 5
2014 1
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 12
2019 13
2020 8
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 145
Download as CSV

Ruth Newbury-Ecob publications per year - data summary

  • Ruth Newbury-Ecob, a Genetics scholar from University of Bristol, has 145 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990, 1996, 1997, 1998 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991 and 1992).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.1 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 11 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 24 publications (1.8 per year); 2002-2014: 53 publications (4.1 per year); 2015-2025: 68 publications (6.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ruth Newbury-Ecob publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Newbury-Ecob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 105–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175 109
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Ruth Newbury-Ecob publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Ruth Newbury-Ecob, a Genetics scholar from University of Bristol, records 109 publications - the 11th percentile of the discipline.
  • 11% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Ruth Newbury-Ecob, and about 89% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Ruth Newbury-Ecob ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Ruth Newbury-Ecob D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Newbury-Ecob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143 52
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Ruth Newbury-Ecob D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Ruth Newbury-Ecob, a Genetics scholar from University of Bristol, records 52 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Ruth Newbury-Ecob, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Ruth Newbury-Ecob ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Ruth Newbury-Ecob is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly contributions are primarily situated within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant emphasis on Genetics and Molecular Biology subfields.

The primary research topics covered by their work include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Cancer-related gene regulation

Their recent papers reflect a focus on genetic disorders, developmental disorders, and neurodevelopmental mechanisms. Notable publications include:

  • Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data (2020, Nature)
  • The contribution of X-linked coding variation to severe developmental disorders (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Mutation-specific pathophysiological mechanisms define different neurodevelopmental disorders associated with SATB1 dysfunction (2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • SLC12A2 variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder or cochleovestibular defect (2020, Brain)
  • Novel truncating mutations in CTNND1 cause a dominant craniofacial and cardiac syndrome (2020, Human Molecular Genetics)

Frequent collaborative partners in their research include:

  • Sally Ann Lynch
  • John Dean
  • Shelagh Joss
  • Shane McKee
  • Swati Naik

They have published multiple articles in the following venues with a repeated focus on genetics and medical genetics:

  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Brain
  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • Holt-Oram syndrome is caused by mutations in TBX5, a member of the Brachyury ( T ) gene family

    Li Qy;Newbury-Ecob Ra;Newbury-Ecob Ra;Terrett Ja;Wilson Di

  • Heterozygous germline mutations in the p53 homolog p63 are the cause of EEC syndrome.

    Jacopo Celli;Pascal Duijf;Ben C.J Hamel;Michael Bamshad

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Jenny Lord;Dominic J McMullan;Ruth Y Eberhardt;Gabriele Rinck

  • Distinct genetic architectures for syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart defects identified by exome sequencing

    Alejandro Sifrim;Marc-Phillip Hitz;Anna Wilsdon;Jeroen Breckpot

  • Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data

    J Kaplanis;K E Samocha;L Wiel;Z Zhang

  • Rare loss-of-function variants in SETD1A are associated with schizophrenia and developmental disorders

    Tarjinder Singh;Mitja I Kurki;David Curtis;Shaun M Purcell

  • Compound inheritance of a low-frequency regulatory SNP and a rare null mutation in exon-junction complex subunit RBM8A causes TAR syndrome

    Cornelis A. Albers;Cornelis A. Albers;Cornelis A. Albers;Dirk S. Paul;Harald Schulze;Kathleen Freson

  • p63 Gene mutations in EEC syndrome, limb-mammary syndrome, and isolated split hand-split foot malformation suggest a genotype-phenotype correlation

    Hans van Bokhoven;Ben C.J. Hamel;Mike Bamshad;Eugenio Sangiorgi

  • Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome.

    Eva Klopocki;Harald Schulze;Gabriele Strauß;Claus-Eric Ott

  • Mutations in DDX3X are a common cause of unexplained intellectual disability with gender-specific effects on wnt signaling

    Lot Snijders Blok;Erik Madsen;Jane Juusola;Christian Gilissen

  • De novo nonsense mutations in ASXL1 cause Bohring-Opitz syndrome

    Alexander Hoischen;Bregje W M van Bon;Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago;Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago;Christian Gilissen

  • Molecular and Clinical Analyses of Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly and Pallister-Hall Syndromes: Robust Phenotype Prediction from the Type and Position of GLI3 Mutations

    Jennifer J. Johnston;Isabelle Olivos-Glander;Christina Killoran;Emma Elson

  • Exome Sequencing Identifies a DYNC1H1 Mutation in a Large Pedigree with Dominant Axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

    Michael N. Weedon;Robert Hastings;Richard Caswell;Weijia Xie

  • Histone Lysine Methylases and Demethylases in the Landscape of Human Developmental Disorders

    Víctor Faundes;Víctor Faundes;William G. Newman;Laura Bernardini;Natalie Canham

  • Mutations in genes encoding the cadherin receptor-ligand pair DCHS1 and FAT4 disrupt cerebral cortical development

    Silvia Cappello;Mary J Gray;Caroline Badouel;Caroline Badouel;Simona Lange

  • Mutations of the catalytic subunit of RAB3GAP cause Warburg Micro syndrome

    Irene A Aligianis;Colin A Johnson;Paul Gissen;Dongrong Chen

  • CDKL5 mutations cause infantile spasms, early onset seizures, and severe mental retardation in female patients

    H L Archer;J Evans;S Edwards;J Colley

  • Mutations at the SALL4 locus on chromosome 20 result in a range of clinically overlapping phenotypes, including Okihiro syndrome, Holt-Oram syndrome, acro-renal-ocular syndrome, and patients previously reported to represent thalidomide embryopathy

    J Kohlhase;L Schubert;M Liebers;A Rauch

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Lord J;McMullan Dj;Eberhardt Ry;Rinck G

  • OPD-spectrum Disorders Clinical Collaborative Group. Localized mutations in the gene encoding the cytoskeletal protein filamin A cause diverse malformations in humans

    SP Robertson;Twigg;AJ Sutherland-Smith;Biancalana

Frequent Co-Authors

Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
Simon E. Fisher
Simon E. Fisher Max Planck Society
Matthew E. Hurles
Matthew E. Hurles Wellcome Sanger Institute
Tjitske Kleefstra
Tjitske Kleefstra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Sally Ann Lynch
Sally Ann Lynch University College Dublin
Willem H. Ouwehand
Willem H. Ouwehand University of Cambridge
Sahar Mansour
Sahar Mansour St George's, University of London
Judith A. Goodship
Judith A. Goodship Newcastle University
Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers
Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers Radboud University
Rolph Pfundt
Rolph Pfundt Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Genetics is a rapidly growing field with many pathways into healthcare and research. For those interested in blending genetics knowledge with clinical work, pursuing further studies in nursing can be a strong option. Nurses with genetics backgrounds are in demand for roles in patient care, genetic counseling, and clinical research.

There are several accessible online degrees to consider. Programs such as the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs and online dnp fnp programs allow you to specialize and advance your career while balancing work and study. If you are just starting out, you might look for the cheapest online nursing prerequisites to build foundational knowledge affordably.

For registered nurses seeking to deepen their expertise, completing one of the many rn to bsn online programs can be a flexible next step. With these pathways, you can broaden your career options—from clinical roles to laboratory research or policy development—in the ever-evolving world of genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth Newbury-Ecob

Trending Scientists