World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William W. O'Neill

William W. O'Neill

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
139
Citations
77425
World Ranking
1748
National Ranking
999

William W. O'Neill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 985 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William W. O'Neill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William W. O'Neill is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly within the field of cardiology. Their research is primarily concentrated in Medicine with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their main research topics cover a range of cardiac-related conditions and interventions, including:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

O'Neill has published in multiple prominent journals, often contributing to literature in highly specialized cardiovascular and interventional medicine fields. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Their collaboration network features several frequent co-authors, notably:

  • Dee Dee Wang
  • Tiberio Frisoli
  • Brian O'Neill
  • Pedro Villablanca
  • Pedro Engel Gonzalez

Recent papers authored under their work include research published across a span of topics and publication venues:

  • Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • Transfemoral tricuspid valve replacement and one-year outcomes: the TRISCEND study, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection, 2020, The American Journal of Medicine
  • One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve, 2020, JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

    C L Grines;K F Browne;J Marco;D Rothbaum

  • ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).

    Sidney C. Smith;Ted E. Feldman;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension

    Deepak L. Bhatt;David E. Kandzari;John M. Flack;Barry T. Katzen

  • Acute Renal Failure After Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Mortality

    Peter A McCullough;Robert Wolyn;Leslie L Rocher;Robert N Levin

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography

    Gilbert L. Raff;Michael J. Gallagher;William W. O’Neill;James A. Goldstein

  • 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines

    Spencer B. King;Sidney C. Smith;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    James A. Goldstein;Demetris Demetriou;Cindy L. Grines;Mark Pica

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Sidney C. Smith;Ted E. Feldman;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction.

    Eric J. Topol;Robert M. Califf;Barry S. George;Dean J. Kereiakes

  • SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019

    David A. Baran;Cindy L. Grines;Steven Bailey;Daniel Burkhoff

  • 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Unknown

  • A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

    James A. Goldstein;Michael J. Gallagher;William W. O’Neill;Michael A. Ross

  • A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock

    Daniel Burkhoff;Howard Cohen;Corinna Brunckhorst;William W. O'Neill

  • A prospective randomized clinical trial of intracoronary streptokinase versus coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

    O'Neill W;Timmis Gc;Bourdillon Pd;Lai P

  • Normal Flow (TIMI-3) Before Mechanical Reperfusion Therapy Is an Independent Determinant of Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction Analysis From the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials

    Gregg W. Stone;David Cox;Eulogio Garcia;Bruce R. Brodie

  • Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification.

    Beth A Bartholomew;Kishore J Harjai;Srinivas Dukkipati;Judith A Boura

  • Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Peter A. McCullough;James A. Tumlin;Norman E. Lepor

  • Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score.

    Amir Halkin;Mandeep Singh;Eugenia Nikolsky;Cindy L. Grines

  • Predictors of blood pressure response in the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial.

    David E Kandzari;Deepak L Bhatt;Sandeep Kaur Brar;Chandan M Devireddy

Frequent Co-Authors

Cindy L. Grines
Cindy L. Grines Wayne State University
Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
Bertram Pitt
Bertram Pitt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eric R. Bates
Eric R. Bates University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eulogio García
Eulogio García Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Barry A. Franklin
Barry A. Franklin Oakland University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

In addition to a traditional medical degree, there are several online programs that can prepare students for vital roles in healthcare. For those interested in pharmacy, the cheapest online pharmacy school programs make advanced study more accessible and affordable.

Not every healthcare career requires many years of medical school. A health information management bachelor degree online can lead to opportunities in organizing patient data and supporting efficient clinical care, all while studying remotely.

If you’re drawn to administrative roles, completing cheapest medical billing and coding online courses opens the door to entry-level positions that are in high demand across healthcare systems nationwide.

For those interested in patient care, an advanced position such as a nurse practitioner is possible through cheap np programs online, allowing working nurses to advance their careers with flexibility and lower costs.

Best Scientists Citing William W. O'Neill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles