World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William W. O'Neill

William W. O'Neill

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 139 1748 1623 998 915 985 77425

William W. O'Neill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William W. O'Neill between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William W. O'Neill published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 21.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2020. 83 of the 1,093 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2020. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 24 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 49 publications 1996: 36 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 23 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 42 publications 2003: 46 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 47 publications 2025: 36 publications
1976 2025

1,093 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William W. O'Neill: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 4
1984 9
1985 4
1986 5
1987 15
1988 17
1989 13
1990 8
1991 24
1992 6
1993 7
1994 16
1995 49
1996 36
1997 21
1998 23
1999 19
2000 15
2001 19
2002 42
2003 46
2004 37
2005 36
2006 24
2007 25
2008 12
2009 13
2010 10
2011 7
2012 24
2013 26
2014 31
2015 36
2016 29
2017 35
2018 33
2019 52
2020 55
2021 39
2022 45
2023 39
2024 47
2025 36
Total 1,093
Download as CSV

William W. O'Neill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 981–1,000 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 985 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96 985
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

William W. O'Neill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 139
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William W. O'Neill is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly within the field of cardiology. Their research is primarily concentrated in Medicine with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their main research topics cover a range of cardiac-related conditions and interventions, including:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

O'Neill has published in multiple prominent journals, often contributing to literature in highly specialized cardiovascular and interventional medicine fields. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Their collaboration network features several frequent co-authors, notably:

  • Dee Dee Wang
  • Tiberio Frisoli
  • Brian O'Neill
  • Pedro Villablanca
  • Pedro Engel Gonzalez

Recent papers authored under their work include research published across a span of topics and publication venues:

  • Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • Transfemoral tricuspid valve replacement and one-year outcomes: the TRISCEND study, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection, 2020, The American Journal of Medicine
  • One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve, 2020, JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

    C L Grines;K F Browne;J Marco;D Rothbaum

  • ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).

    Sidney C. Smith;Ted E. Feldman;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension

    Deepak L. Bhatt;David E. Kandzari;John M. Flack;Barry T. Katzen

  • Acute Renal Failure After Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Mortality

    Peter A McCullough;Robert Wolyn;Leslie L Rocher;Robert N Levin

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography

    Gilbert L. Raff;Michael J. Gallagher;William W. O’Neill;James A. Goldstein

  • 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines

    Spencer B. King;Sidney C. Smith;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    James A. Goldstein;Demetris Demetriou;Cindy L. Grines;Mark Pica

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Sidney C. Smith;Ted E. Feldman;John W. Hirshfeld;Alice K. Jacobs

  • A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction.

    Eric J. Topol;Robert M. Califf;Barry S. George;Dean J. Kereiakes

  • SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019

    David A. Baran;Cindy L. Grines;Steven Bailey;Daniel Burkhoff

  • 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Unknown

  • A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

    James A. Goldstein;Michael J. Gallagher;William W. O’Neill;Michael A. Ross

  • A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock

    Daniel Burkhoff;Howard Cohen;Corinna Brunckhorst;William W. O'Neill

  • A prospective randomized clinical trial of intracoronary streptokinase versus coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

    O'Neill W;Timmis Gc;Bourdillon Pd;Lai P

  • Normal Flow (TIMI-3) Before Mechanical Reperfusion Therapy Is an Independent Determinant of Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction Analysis From the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials

    Gregg W. Stone;David Cox;Eulogio Garcia;Bruce R. Brodie

  • Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification.

    Beth A Bartholomew;Kishore J Harjai;Srinivas Dukkipati;Judith A Boura

  • Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Peter A. McCullough;James A. Tumlin;Norman E. Lepor

  • Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score.

    Amir Halkin;Mandeep Singh;Eugenia Nikolsky;Cindy L. Grines

  • Predictors of blood pressure response in the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial.

    David E Kandzari;Deepak L Bhatt;Sandeep Kaur Brar;Chandan M Devireddy

Frequent Co-Authors

Cindy L. Grines
Cindy L. Grines Wayne State University
Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
Bertram Pitt
Bertram Pitt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eric R. Bates
Eric R. Bates University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eulogio García
Eulogio García Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Barry A. Franklin
Barry A. Franklin Oakland University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

In addition to a traditional medical degree, there are several online programs that can prepare students for vital roles in healthcare. For those interested in pharmacy, the cheapest online pharmacy school programs make advanced study more accessible and affordable.

Not every healthcare career requires many years of medical school. A health information management bachelor degree online can lead to opportunities in organizing patient data and supporting efficient clinical care, all while studying remotely.

If you’re drawn to administrative roles, completing cheapest medical billing and coding online courses opens the door to entry-level positions that are in high demand across healthcare systems nationwide.

For those interested in patient care, an advanced position such as a nurse practitioner is possible through cheap np programs online, allowing working nurses to advance their careers with flexibility and lower costs.

Best Scientists Citing William W. O'Neill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles