World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
11588
World Ranking
6330
National Ranking
3432

Peter D. Eimas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Eimas sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter D. Eimas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Eimas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1973 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1971 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter D. Eimas was affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their academic career involved research and scientific inquiry documented through various publications and contributions to their field.

Throughout their career, they received recognition in the form of awards, including being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1971. Subsequently, they were awarded the status of Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1973.

The scientist's work spanned multiple areas of study, and although specific fields and subfields of study are not detailed, their contributions align with academic research typically associated with higher education institutions such as Brown University.

There is no publicly available information on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or main topics of work. This absence of detailed publication data limits a precise overview of their research focus or specific academic collaborations.

Peter D. Eimas is deceased, and their legacy remains as part of the historical body of scientific knowledge affiliated with Brown University and recognized by prestigious academic honors.

Best Publications

  • Speech perception in infants.

    Peter D. Eimas;Einar R. Siqueland;Peter Jusczyk;James Vigorito

  • Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors

    Peter D. Eimas;John D. Corbit

  • Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants.

    Paul C Quinn;Peter D Eimas;Stacey L Rosenkrantz

  • Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants.

    Peter D. Eimas;Paul C. Quinn

  • Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-l] distinction by young infants

    Peter D. Eimas

  • The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels

    Unknown

  • Perceptual Cues That Permit Categorical Differentiation of Animal Species by Infants.

    Paul C. Quinn;Peter D. Eimas

  • chapter 6 – Speech Perception in Early Infancy1

    Peter D. Eimas

  • Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants

    Peter D. Eimas

  • Contextual effects in infant speech perception

    Peter D. Eimas;Joanne L. Miller

  • Effects of Context on the Classification of Words and Nonwords.

    Richard E. Schuberth;Peter D. Eimas

  • Perspectives on the study of speech

    Peter D. Eimas;Joanne L. Miller

  • A Reexamination of the Perceptual-to-Conceptual Shift in Mental Representations:

    Paul C. Quinn;Peter D. Eimas

  • Speech, language, and communication

    Joanne L. Miller;Peter D. Eimas

  • INTRADIMENSIONAL AND EXTRADIMENSIONAL SHIFTS IN THE RAT.

    Bryan E. Shepp;Peter D. Eimas

  • Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.

    Joanne L. Miller;Peter D. Eimas

  • The Emergence of Category Representations During Infancy: Are Separate Perceptual and Conceptual Processes Required?

    Paul C. Quinn;Peter D. Eimas

  • Global and local processing by 3- and 4-month-old infants.

    Hei-Rhee Ghim;Peter D. Eimas

  • Evidence for a Global Categorical Representation of Humans by Young Infants

    Paul C. Quinn;Peter D. Eimas

  • Some properties of linguistic feature detectors

    Peter D. Eimas;William E. Cooper;John D. Corbit

  • On Categorization in Early Infancy.

    Paul C. Quinn;Peter D. Eimas

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne L. Miller
Joanne L. Miller Northeastern University
Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Athanassios Protopapas
Athanassios Protopapas University of Oslo
Albert M. Galaburda
Albert M. Galaburda Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Alvin M. Liberman
Alvin M. Liberman Haskins Laboratories
Michael J. Tarr
Michael J. Tarr Carnegie Mellon University
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Nancy J. Keuthen
Nancy J. Keuthen Harvard University
Robert J. Zatorre
Robert J. Zatorre McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in mental health and counseling. Online psychology degrees can be an excellent starting point for those interested in becoming therapists, counselors, or other mental health professionals. However, entering these careers involves additional requirements, including supervised clinical hours and passing licensure exams.

The process to become a licensed therapist varies by location. For detailed information about how to become a licensed therapist in Oakland, you need to be aware of both educational prerequisites and state-specific licensure regulations. If you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Oklahoma City, you’ll find that requirements and processes may differ compared to other states.

Want to practice in Nebraska? Review the licensed therapist requirements in Omaha to ensure compliance with local guidelines. Similarly, those planning to work in Florida should familiarize themselves with Orlando licensed therapist requirements. Understanding these pathways will help you make informed decisions for your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Eimas

Recently Published Articles