World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
21329
World Ranking
4494
National Ranking
2495

Jean M. Mandler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean M. Mandler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jean M. Mandler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean M. Mandler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Jean M. Mandler is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic work spans multiple fields, including Psychology, Arts and Humanities, and Engineering.

The primary areas of research focus include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, and Automotive Engineering. Mandler's work covers several specific topics:

  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Throughout their career, Mandler has contributed to the understanding of how cognitive processes interact with language and perception. Their research explores the ways in which categorization influences language use and how metaphor shapes cognition. The investigation of syntax and semantics is also a notable aspect of their work, addressing linguistic variation and structure.

The spatial cognition and navigation topic indicates an interest in how individuals perceive and interact with physical and spatial environments, linking cognitive psychology with practical applications possibly related to navigation or spatial awareness.

Jean M. Mandler has been recognized by significant professional bodies during their career. Notably, they received the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 2007. Additionally, they were named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1996.

Best Publications

  • Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall☆

    Jean M. Mandler;Nancy S. Johnson

  • Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory

    Jean Matter Mandler

  • How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives.

    Jean M. Mandler

  • The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought.

    Jean Matter Mandler

  • How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system☆

    Jean M. Mandler

  • Concept formation in infancy

    Jean M. Mandler;Laraine McDonough

  • Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories ☆

    Jean M Mandler;Patricia J Bauer;Laraine McDonough

  • Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy

    Jean M. Mandler

  • Autonomic feedback: the perception of autonomic activity.

    George Mandler;Jean M. Mandler;Ellen T. Uviller

  • Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults.

    Laraine McDonough;Soonja Choi;Jean M Mandler

  • One thing follows another: Effects of temporal structure on 1- to 2-year-olds' recall of events.

    Patricia J. Bauer;Jean M. Mandler

  • A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories

    Nancy S. Johnson;Jean M. Mandler

  • Drinking and driving don't mix: inductive generalization in infancy

    Jean M. Mandler;Jean M. Mandler;Laraine McDonough

  • Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures.

    Jean M. Mandler;Richard E. Parker

  • The cradle of categorization: Is the basic level basic?

    Jean M. Mandler;Patricia J. Bauer

  • On defining image schemas

    Jean M. Mandler;Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas

  • Long-Term Memory for Pictures.

    Jean M. Mandler;Gary H. Ritchey

  • Thinking: from association to Gestalt

    Jean Matter Mandler;George Mandler

  • Early Sensitivity to Language-Specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean

    Soonja Choi;Laraine McDonough;Melissa Bowerman;Jean M Mandler

  • The deferred imitation task as a nonverbal measure of declarative memory

    Laraine McDonough;Jean M. Mandler;Richard D. McKee;Larry R. Squire

Frequent Co-Authors

George Mandler
George Mandler University of California, San Diego
Patricia J. Bauer
Patricia J. Bauer Emory University
Katharina J. Rohlfing
Katharina J. Rohlfing University of Paderborn
Philipp Cimiano
Philipp Cimiano Bielefeld University
Melissa Bowerman
Melissa Bowerman Max Planck Society
Robyn Fivush
Robyn Fivush Emory University
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
Michael Cole
Michael Cole University of East London
Michael A. Wallach
Michael A. Wallach Duke University
Peter Bryant
Peter Bryant University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education options and professional pathways. Many students are drawn to specialized careers like marriage and family therapy, which offer the chance to make a direct impact in people's lives. The path to becoming a therapist can vary significantly by state and city, making it important to understand the local educational and licensing requirements.

For example, aspiring therapists in New York should review the Buffalo mft education requirements. Individuals interested in practicing in Arizona can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Chandler. If you are based in North Carolina, check the Charlotte mft education requirements, while those in Virginia should refer to the mft requirements in Chesapeake.

Exploring online degree programs can provide flexibility as you balance your studies with other commitments. By meeting the right requirements, you can position yourself for success in a fulfilling psychology career—no matter where you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Jean M. Mandler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles