World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael A. Wallach

Michael A. Wallach

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
14887
World Ranking
4527
National Ranking
2516

Michael A. Wallach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Wallach sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael A. Wallach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Wallach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1967 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Michael A. Wallach was affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spanned several fields and focused mainly on topics related to mental health, employment, and education.

The main fields of study in their work were Psychology and Health Professions. Within these, they contributed to subfields including General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research covered a variety of topics, emphasizing areas such as Mental Health Treatment and Access, Employment and Welfare Studies, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience.

One of their recent papers was titled Employment is a critical mental health intervention, published in 2020 in the journal Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences.

  • Employment is a critical mental health intervention (2020, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences)

Frequent publication venues for their work included Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences.

  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Among the frequent co-authors who collaborated with Michael A. Wallach were Robert E. Drake and Nathan Kogan.

  • Robert E. Drake
  • Nathan Kogan

Michael A. Wallach was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1967.

Best Publications

  • Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality

    David C. Glass;Nathan Kogan;Michael A. Wallach

  • Modes of thinking in young children

    Lee S. Shulman;Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan

  • Dual diagnosis: a review of etiological theories.

    Kim T Mueser;Robert E Drake;Michael A Wallach

  • Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan

  • Alcohol use and abuse in schizophrenia: A prospective community study.

    Robert E. Drake;Fred C. Osher;Michael A. Wallach

  • A systematic review of psychosocial research on psychosocial interventions for people with co-occurring severe mental and substance use disorders

    Robert E. Drake;Erica L. O'Neal;Michael A. Wallach

  • Substance Abuse Among the Chronic Mentally Ill

    Robert E. Drake;Michael A. Wallach

  • Group influence on individual risk taking.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan;Daryl J. Bem

  • Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality

    Nathan Kogan;Michael A. Wallach

  • DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND LEVEL OF RISK TAKING IN GROUPS.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan;Daryl J. Bem

  • THE COURSE, TREATMENT, AND OUTCOME OF SUBSTANCE DISORDER IN PERSONS WITH SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS

    Robert E. Drake;Kim T. Mueser;Robin E. Clark;Michael A. Wallach

  • Homelessness and dual diagnosis.

    Robert E. Drake;Fred C. Osher;Michael A. Wallach

  • Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms -- Technical Manual@@@Thinking Creatively with Words, Test Booklets and Manuals, Form A, Form B@@@Thinking Creatively with Pictures, Test Booklets and Manuals, Form A, Form B

    Michael A. Wallach;E. Paul Torrance

  • The roles of information, discussion, and consensus in group risk taking

    Michael A Wallach;Nathan Kogan

  • Aspects of judgment and decision making: interrelationships and changes with age.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan

  • Sex differences and judgment processes1

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan

  • Characteristic Hostility in Schizophrenic Outpatients

    Stephen J. Bartels;Robert E. Drake;Michael A. Wallach;Daniel H. Freeman

  • Long-term course of substance use disorders among patients with severe mental illness.

    Stephen J. Bartels;Robert E. Drake;Michael A. Wallach

  • Dual Diagnosis: 15 Years of Progress

    Robert E. Drake;Michael A. Wallach

  • GROUP DECISION MAKING UNDER RISK OF AVERSIVE CONSEQUENCES.

    Daryl J. Bem;Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Drake
Robert E. Drake Westat (United States)
Kim T. Mueser
Kim T. Mueser Boston University
Daryl J. Bem
Daryl J. Bem Cornell University
George Mandler
George Mandler University of California, San Diego
Stephen J. Bartels
Stephen J. Bartels Harvard University
Jerome S. Bruner
Jerome S. Bruner New York University
David P. Ausubel
David P. Ausubel City University of New York
Jean M. Mandler
Jean M. Mandler University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health services. With the growth of telehealth and online education, students now have more flexible options to pursue advanced degrees tailored to their career goals.

Prospective students should consider both academic quality and potential career outcomes when selecting a program. For example, those exploring programs in Missouri can review the most valuable counseling programs in Missouri to compare value and opportunities. Similarly, individuals interested in Pennsylvania can consult the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania, while those focusing on urban settings may find additional insights in the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Philadelphia.

For students considering the Pacific Northwest, the best value counseling programs in Seattle highlight institutions known for balancing affordability with strong job placement. As you explore your options, be sure to research licensing requirements and available specializations, which can impact your future earning potential and professional satisfaction.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Wallach

Recently Published Articles