World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8349 7800 4448 4051 71 25104

Daryl J. Bem publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daryl J. Bem between 1962 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daryl J. Bem published across 60 years, from 1962 to 2021, averaging 1.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1968. 4 of the 73 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1968. 1962: 2 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 1 publication 1965: 3 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 3 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1962 2021

73 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daryl J. Bem: publications per year, 1962 to 2021
Year Publications
1962 2
1963 1
1964 1
1965 3
1966 1
1967 3
1968 5
1969 0
1970 3
1971 1
1972 2
1973 2
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 3
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 5
2012 2
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 4
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 2
2021 2
Total 73
Download as CSV

Daryl J. Bem publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl J. Bem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 71
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daryl J. Bem D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl J. Bem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Cognition
  • Statistics

His main research concerns Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Life course approach, Social relation and Self perception. The various areas that Daryl J. Bem examines in his Social psychology study include Interpersonal perception and Cognition. His study in Developmental psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Recall and Affect.

His research integrates issues of Personality development and Personality in his study of Life course approach. His Personality research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Erikson's stages of psychosocial development and Social isolation. His Self perception research incorporates elements of Self persuasion and Persuasion.

His most cited work include:

  • Self-Perception Theory (3686 citations)
  • Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. (2310 citations)
  • ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR (1126 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Daryl J. Bem mainly investigates Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology, Personality and Psychoanalysis. His research links Cognition with Social psychology. His Developmental psychology research incorporates elements of Homosexuality, Heterosexuality, Interpersonal relationship and Sexual orientation.

His Cognitive psychology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Interpersonal communication, Feeling states and Cognitive dissonance, Self-perception theory. His Cognitive dissonance research integrates issues from Interpretation, Attitude change and Self. His Self-perception theory research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Observer, Uninterpretable and Foot-in-the-door technique.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (50.79%)
  • Developmental psychology (20.63%)
  • Cognitive psychology (12.70%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2021)?

  • Social psychology (50.79%)
  • Cognitive psychology (12.70%)
  • Meta-analysis (6.35%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Meta-analysis, Bayesian probability and Precognition. He interconnects Consciousness, Developmental psychology, Path analysis, Frequentist probability and Priming in the investigation of issues within Social psychology. The Developmental psychology study combines topics in areas such as Homosexuality, Sexual orientation, Childhood gender nonconformity and Conformity.

His Cognitive psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Feeling states, Feeling and Anticipation. His work carried out in the field of Bayesian probability brings together such families of science as Argument and Set. In general Cognition study, his work on Social cognition often relates to the realm of Extrasensory perception, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

Between 2004 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect (442 citations)
  • Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data (54 citations)
  • Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events. (35 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Cognition
  • Statistics

His primary areas of investigation include Bayesian probability, Cognition, Social psychology, Statistical hypothesis testing and Bayes factor. He studies Prior probability which is a part of Bayesian probability. The concepts of his Cognition study are interwoven with issues in Habituation, Recall and Affect.

His research in Social psychology intersects with topics in Argument and Frequentist probability. Statistical hypothesis testing combines with fields such as Precognition, Meta-analysis and Term in his work. His Bayes factor research overlaps with other disciplines such as Neuroscience and Statistical significance.

Best Publications

  • SELF-PERCEPTION THEORY

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena

    Daryl J. Bem

  • ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR

    Daryl J. Bem;Andrea Allen

  • Moving away from the World: Life-Course Patterns of Shy Children.

    Avshalom Caspi;Glen H. Elder;Daryl J. Bem

  • Moving Against the World: Life-Course Patterns of Explosive Children

    Avshalom Caspi;Glen H. Elder;Daryl J. Bem

  • Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Beliefs Attitudes and Human Affairs

    Daryl J. Bem

  • An experimental analysis of self-persuasion☆

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Continuities and consequences of interactional styles across the life course.

    Avshalom Caspi;Daryl J. Bem;Glen H. Elder

  • Group influence on individual risk taking.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan;Daryl J. Bem

  • Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: on the salience of premanipulation attitudes.

    D J Bem;H K McConnell

  • Writing the Empirical Journal Article

    Daryl J. Bem

  • DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND LEVEL OF RISK TAKING IN GROUPS.

    Michael A. Wallach;Nathan Kogan;Daryl J. Bem

  • Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer.

    Daryl J. Bem;Charles Honorton

  • Exotic Becomes Erotic: A Developmental Theory of Sexual Orientation

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Does Sex‐biased Job Advertising “Aid and Abet” Sex Discrimination?1

    Sandra L Bem;Daryl J. Bem

  • Writing a Review Article for Psychological Bulletin

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events.

    Daryl Bem;Patrizio E. Tressoldi;Thomas Rabeyron;Michael Duggan

  • Constructing cross-situational consistencies in behavior: some thoughts on Alker's critique of Mischel

    Daryl J. Bem

  • Life course sequelae of childhood shyness in Sweden : Comparison with the United States

    Margaret Kerr;William W. Lambert;Daryl J. Bem

  • TESTING THE SELF-PERCEPTION EXPLANATION OF DISSONANCE PHENOMENA:

    Daryl J. Bem;H. Keith

Frequent Co-Authors

Glen H. Elder
Glen H. Elder University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University
Richard C. Atkinson
Richard C. Atkinson University of California, San Diego
Michael A. Wallach
Michael A. Wallach Duke University
Etzel Cardeña
Etzel Cardeña Lund University
Wesley O. Johnson
Wesley O. Johnson University of California, Irvine
Harald Walach
Harald Walach European University Viadrina
Arnaud Delorme
Arnaud Delorme University of California, San Diego
Margaret Kerr
Margaret Kerr Örebro University
Charles G. Lord
Charles G. Lord Texas Christian University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities, particularly in the field of counseling. Many students pursue online programs to balance education with work or family commitments, making it easier to acquire in-demand skills from anywhere.

Key pathways include clinical counseling, school counseling, substance abuse counseling, marriage and family therapy, and mental health counseling. Each pathway offers unique specialization areas based on your interests and desired impact within the community.

When exploring options, consider region-specific programs. For example, the popular counseling degrees in Colorado cater to students seeking flexible and innovative online learning. Similarly, those in the Southeast can review best-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia for well-respected options.

Meanwhile, the popular counseling programs in Florida and top-ranked counseling degree programs in Massachusetts reflect regional strengths and specialization areas. Graduates from these programs are well-prepared for licensure and a rewarding career supporting individuals, families, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Daryl J. Bem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles