World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5842 5423 962 894 114 8618

Peter Chapman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Chapman between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Chapman published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2019. 3 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2019. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Chapman: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 7
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 1
2005 4
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 6
2011 5
2012 6
2013 1
2014 5
2015 4
2016 2
2017 2
2018 8
2019 10
2020 8
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
2024 0
2025 3
Total 126
Download as CSV

Peter Chapman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 114
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Chapman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Chapman is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with 14 publications attributed to this domain. Within this area, Chapman has contributed significantly to subfields including Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work spans a range of topics with notable emphasis on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Traffic and Road Safety, Safety Warnings and Signage, Face Recognition and Perception, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Occupational Health and Safety Research, and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology.

Chapman has published in several venues, with multiple articles appearing in Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Other publication venues include Accident Analysis & Prevention, Consciousness and Cognition, i-Perception, and IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter Chapman include:

  • Evaluating the impact of Heavy Goods Vehicle driver monitoring and coaching to reduce risky behaviour, 2020, Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Individual conscious and unconscious perception of emotion: Theory, methodology and applications, 2021, Consciousness and Cognition
  • "The Harder One Tries...": Findings and Insights From the Application of Covert Response Pressure Assessment Technology in Three Studies of Visual Perception, 2020, i-Perception
  • A cross-cultural comparison of where drivers choose to look when viewing driving scenes, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • "There Is No (Where a) Face Like Home": Recognition and Appraisal Responses to Masked Facial Dialects of Emotion in Four Different National Cultures, 2021, Perception

Frequent collaborators in Chapman's research include:

  • Jimiama Mafeni Mase
  • Grazziela P. Figueredo
  • Myron Tsikandilakis
  • Persefoni Bali
  • Jan Derrfuß

Their research outputs demonstrate a blend of experimental and applied psychology, with a sustained interest in the interaction between humans and automated systems as well as safety in traffic environments. Chapman's work in face recognition and perception intersects with cultural psychology and emotional appraisal, providing insights into how visual and cognitive processes operate in varied contexts.

Best Publications

  • Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Neil Brocklehurst;Jean Underwood

  • VISUAL SEARCH OF DRIVING SITUATIONS: DANGER AND EXPERIENCE

    Peter R Chapman;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving

    Panos Konstantopoulos;Peter Chapman;David Crundall

  • Anger while driving

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Sharon Wright;David Crundall

  • VISUAL SEARCH WHILE DRIVING: SKILL AND AWARENESS DURING INSPECTION OF THE SCENE

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Karen Bowden;David Crundall

  • Driving simulator validation with hazard perception

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • Driving experience and the functional field of view.

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Some hazards are more attractive than others: Drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Steven Trawley;Lyn Collins

  • VISUAL SEARCH PATTERNS IN TRAINED AND UNTRAINED NOVICE DRIVERS

    Peter Chapman;Geoffrey Underwood;Katherine L. Roberts

  • Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance.

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • What happens next? Predicting other road users' behaviour as a function of driving experience and processing time

    Lyn Jackson;Peter Chapman;David Crundall

  • Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving.

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Nicola Phelps;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • Mental workload is reflected in driver behaviour, physiology, eye movements and prefrontal cortex activation.

    Hannah J. Foy;Peter Chapman

  • Do gaze cues in complex scenes capture and direct the attention of high functioning adolescents with ASD? Evidence from eye-tracking.

    M. Freeth;M. Freeth;P. Chapman;D. Ropar;P. Mitchell

  • Attending to the peripheral world while driving

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator

    David Crundall;Ben Andrews;Editha van Loon;Peter Chapman

  • Blanket execution: dynamic similarity testing for program binaries and components

    Manuel Egele;Maverick Woo;Peter Chapman;David Brumley

  • An application of the theory of planned behaviour to truck driving behaviour and compliance with regulations

    Damian R. Poulter;Peter Chapman;Peter A. Bibby;David D. Clarke

  • Visual Search of Dynamic Scenes: Event Types and the Role of Experience in Viewing Driving Situations

    Peter R. Chapman;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Forgetting near-accidents: the roles of severity, culpability and experience in the poor recall of dangerous driving situations

    Peter Chapman;Geoffrey J. Underwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey Underwood
Geoffrey Underwood University of Nottingham
David Crundall
David Crundall Nottingham Trent University
John A. Groeger
John A. Groeger Nottingham Trent University
Peter Mitchell
Peter Mitchell University of Nottingham
Danielle Ropar
Danielle Ropar University of Nottingham
David Brumley
David Brumley Carnegie Mellon University
Sarah Cassidy
Sarah Cassidy University of Nottingham
Christopher R. Madan
Christopher R. Madan University of Nottingham
David Carmel
David Carmel Amazon (Israel)
David Evans
David Evans University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens up a range of flexible degree options. Many students start their journey with an accelerated online bachelor's degree, allowing them to complete studies faster and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated learners who want to save time and money.

For those aspiring to advance their expertise, a quality online master's degree offers specialization in fields such as psychology, education, or public policy. If your interest is in psychology, numerous masters programs in psychology provide affordable and flexible pathways to careers in counseling, research, or clinical practice.

Education professionals seeking leadership roles may benefit from 2 year ed.d programs online. These fast-track doctorates help learners quickly position themselves for higher administrative or academic positions.

By choosing online degrees, you gain valuable skills and open diverse career pathways—whether in research, education, advocacy, or the nonprofit sector—while balancing study with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles