World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 30 9739 9352 136 131 92 18760

Thomas G. Cooper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas G. Cooper between 1994 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas G. Cooper published across 28 years, from 1994 to 2021, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2006. 4 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2006. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1994 2021

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas G. Cooper: publications per year, 1994 to 2021
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 4
1999 13
2000 2
2001 0
2002 4
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 27
2007 5
2008 0
2009 4
2010 5
2011 6
2012 5
2013 8
2014 11
2015 5
2016 2
2017 7
2018 0
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
Total 124
Download as CSV

Thomas G. Cooper publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259 92
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas G. Cooper D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59 30
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Surgery

Surgical instrument, Robotic surgery, Manipulator, Robot end effector and Robotic systems are his primary areas of study. Thomas G. Cooper interconnects Guide tube, Cartesian coordinate system and Biomedical engineering in the investigation of issues within Surgical instrument. In his research, Thomas G. Cooper undertakes multidisciplinary study on Manipulator and Interface.

The various areas that Thomas G. Cooper examines in his Robot end effector study include Control engineering and Control theory. Thomas G. Cooper has included themes like Read-only memory, Non-volatile memory and Embedded system in his Robotic systems study. As part of the same scientific family, Thomas G. Cooper usually focuses on Wrist, concentrating on Mechanism and intersecting with Actuator.

His most cited work include:

  • Mechanical actuator interface system for robotic surgical tools (1310 citations)
  • Surgical robotic tools, data architecture, and use (1265 citations)
  • Surgical tool having positively positionable tendon-actuated multi-disk wrist joint (1260 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Surgical instrument, Control theory, Simulation, Manipulator and Robot end effector. Thomas G. Cooper combines subjects such as Acoustics, Guide tube, Actuator and Biomedical engineering with his study of Surgical instrument. Thomas G. Cooper usually deals with Simulation and limits it to topics linked to Torque and Backlash.

His Manipulator study combines topics in areas such as Engineering drawing, Computer hardware, Base and Robotic surgery. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Robotic surgery, concentrating on Robotic systems and frequently concerns with Non-volatile memory and Read-only memory. The Robot end effector study combines topics in areas such as Tube and Wrist.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Surgical instrument (36.36%)
  • Control theory (21.97%)
  • Simulation (21.21%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Surgical instrument (36.36%)
  • Mechanical engineering (12.88%)
  • Manipulator (17.42%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Surgical instrument, Mechanical engineering, Manipulator, Mechanism and Simulation. His Surgical instrument study incorporates themes from Control and Actuator. Thomas G. Cooper focuses mostly in the field of Mechanical engineering, narrowing it down to matters related to Robot end effector and, in some cases, Tube, Routing and Electrical conduit.

The Manipulator study which covers Computer hardware that intersects with Base and Robotic surgery. His work deals with themes such as Read-only memory, Non-volatile memory and Robotic systems, which intersect with Robotic surgery. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cannula, Positioning system, STERILE FIELD and Adapter in addition to Simulation.

Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Articulatable members having constrained motion, and related devices and methods (9 citations)
  • Limited movement of a surgical mounting platform controlled by manual motion of robotic arms (8 citations)
  • A surgical system with variable entry guide configurations (7 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Surgery

His scientific interests lie mostly in Surgical instrument, Simulation, Positioning system, Manipulator and Motion. His research in Surgical instrument intersects with topics in Distal portion, Optoelectronics, Electrically conductive, Integrally closed and Coupling. His Simulation research integrates issues from Control system, Movement, Control engineering and Kinematic chain.

He interconnects Parallel manipulator, Port, Engineering drawing and Port in the investigation of issues within Positioning system. His Motion study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Actuator.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical actuator interface system for robotic surgical tools

    Michael J. Tierney;Thomas G. Cooper;Chris A. Julian;Stephen J. Blumenkranz

  • Surgical robotic tools, data architecture, and use

    Michael J. Tierney;Thomas G. Cooper;Christopher A. Julian;Stephen J. Blumenkranz

  • Multicomponent telepresence system and method thereof

    ジー. クーパー トーマス;Thomas G Cooper

  • Grip strength with tactile feedback for robotic surgery

    William C. Nowlin;Gary S. Guthart;Robert G. Younge;Thomas G. Cooper

  • Cardiac tissue ablation instrument with flexible wrist

    Michael H. Ikeda;David J. Rosa;Thomas G. Cooper;S. Christopher Anderson

  • Sterile drape interface for robotic surgical instrument

    Thomas G. Cooper;Craig R. Ramstad

  • Articulate and swapable endoscope for surgical robot

    S Chiristopher Anderson;Thomas G Cooper;Christopher J Hasser;Nitish Swarup

  • Instrument interface of a robotic surgical system

    Roman L. Devengenzo;Thomas G. Cooper;Joseph P. Orban;Bruce Michael Schena

  • Robotic arms with strap drive trains

    Todd R. Solomon;Thomas G. Cooper

  • Control system configured to compensate for non-ideal actuator-to-joint linkage characteristics in a medical robotic system

    Nicola Diolaiti;David Q. Larkin;Thomas G. Cooper;Bruce M. Schena

  • Lever actuated output gimbals

    Thomas G. Cooper;Anthony McGrogan;Matthew Reagan Williams;Eugene F. Duval

  • Devices and methods for presenting and regulating auxiliary information on an image display of a telesurgical system to assist an operator in performing a surgical procedure

    J. Kenneth Salisbury;Gunter D. Niemeyer;Robert G. Younge;Gary S. Guthart

  • Sterile surgical adaptor

    Joseph P. Orban;S. Christopher Anderson;Roman Devengenzo;Bruce M. Schena

  • Modular manipulator support for robotic

    Stephen J Blumenkranz;Thomas Cooper;Gary S Guthart;David Rosa

  • Devices and methods for moving an image capture device in telesurgical systems

    Thomas G. Cooper;Dean F. Hoornaert;Steven J. Blumenkranz

  • Offset remote center manipulator for robotic surgery

    Thomas G. Cooper;Todd R. Solomon

  • In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery and methods

    Thomas G. Cooper;Christopher A. Julian;Michael Ikeda;Daniel T. Wallace

  • Sterile surgical drape

    Joseph P. Orban;Lisa W. Heaton;S. Christopher Anderson;Thomas G. Cooper

  • Flexible ultrasonic transducers and related systems

    John A. Hossack;John W. Eaton;Thomas G. Cooper;Michael H. Ikeda

  • Telescoping insertion axis of a robotic surgical system

    Roman L. Devengenzo;Thomas G. Cooper;Bruce Schena

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce M. Schena
Bruce M. Schena Intuitive Surgical (United States)
John A. Hossack
John A. Hossack University of Virginia
Günter Niemeyer
Günter Niemeyer California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas G. Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles