World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
17127
World Ranking
8167
National Ranking
3693

Jack R. Harkema publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack R. Harkema sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 334 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jack R. Harkema D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack R. Harkema sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack R. Harkema is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and environmental science, with a primary focus on health impacts related to toxicology, immunology, and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Environmental Science

Their subfields of study are specialized in areas such as:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Immunology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Key research topics covered by Jack R. Harkema include:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Recent publications provide insight into the breadth of their work:

  • Outdoor Air Pollution and New-Onset Airway Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report (2020), published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • Arsenic and benzo[a]pyrene co-exposure acts synergistically in inducing cancer stem cell-like property and tumorigenesis by epigenetically down-regulating SOCS3 expression (2020), published in Environment International
  • Omega-3 fatty acid intake suppresses induction of diverse autoantibody repertoire by crystalline silica in lupus-prone mice (2020), published in Autoimmunity
  • Neuroinflammatory and Neurometabolomic Consequences From Inhaled Wildfire Smoke-Derived Particulate Matter in the Western United States (2021), published in Toxicological Sciences
  • Rapid Induction of Pulmonary Inflammation, Autoimmune Gene Expression, and Ectopic Lymphoid Neogenesis Following Acute Silica Exposure in Lupus-Prone Mice (2021), published in Frontiers in Immunology

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • James G. Wagner
  • James J. Pestka
  • Ryan P. Lewandowski
  • Kathryn A. Wierenga
  • Abby D. Benninghoff

Jack R. Harkema regularly publishes in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Particle and Fibre Toxicology
  • Toxicological Sciences

Best Publications

  • Increased airway epithelial Na+ absorption produces cystic fibrosis-like lung disease in mice.

    Marcus Mall;Barbara R Grubb;Jack R Harkema;Wanda K O'Neal

  • Ambient Particulate Pollutants in the Ultrafine Range Promote Early Atherosclerosis and Systemic Oxidative Stress

    Jesus A. Araujo;Berenice Barajas;Michael Kleinman;Xuping Wang

  • The Nose Revisited: A Brief Review of the Comparative Structure, Function, and Toxicologic Pathology of the Nasal Epithelium

    Jack R. Harkema;Stephan A. Carey;James G. Wagner

  • Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse respiratory tract.

    Roger Renne;Amy Brix;Jack Harkema;Ron Herbert

  • Vaccine Efficacy in Senescent Mice Challenged with Recombinant SARS-CoV Bearing Epidemic and Zoonotic Spike Variants

    Damon Deming;Timothy Sheahan;Mark Heise;Boyd Yount

  • Effects of subchronically inhaled carbon black in three species. I. Retention kinetics, lung inflammation, and histopathology.

    Alison Elder;Robert Gelein;Jacob N. Finkelstein;Kevin E. Driscoll

  • Air pollution-mediated susceptibility to inflammation and insulin resistance: influence of CCR2 pathways in mice.

    Cuiqing Liu;Xiaohua Xu;Yuntao Bai;Tse Yao Wang

  • The Adjuvant Effect of Ambient Particulate Matter Is Closely Reflected by the Particulate Oxidant Potential

    Ning Li;Meiying Wang;Lori A. Bramble;Debra A. Schmitz

  • Ambient particulate air pollution induces oxidative stress and alterations of mitochondria and gene expression in brown and white adipose tissues

    Zhaobin Xu;Zhaobin Xu;Xiaohua Xu;Mianhua Zhong;Ian P. Hotchkiss

  • Long-term exposure to concentrated ambient PM2.5 increases mouse blood pressure through abnormal activation of the sympathetic nervous system: a role for hypothalamic inflammation.

    Zhekang Ying;Xiaohua Xu;Yuntao Bai;Jixin Zhong

  • Temporal and Dose-Dependent Hepatic Gene Expression Patterns in Mice Provide New Insights into TCDD-Mediated Hepatotoxicity

    Darrell R. Boverhof;Lyle D. Burgoon;Colleen Tashiro;Brock Chittim

  • Development of Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema in β-Epithelial Na+ Channel–Overexpressing Mice

    Marcus A. Mall;Jack R. Harkema;Joanna B. Trojanek;Diana Treis

  • Reduced metabolic insulin sensitivity following sub-acute exposures to low levels of ambient fine particulate matter air pollution.

    Robert D. Brook;Xiaohua Xu;Robert L. Bard;J. Timothy Dvonch

  • Linkage analysis of susceptibility to ozone-induced lung inflammation in inbred mice

    Steven R. Kleeberger;Roy C. Levitt;Liu Yi Zhang;Malinda Longphre

  • Comparative toxicogenomic analysis of the hepatotoxic effects of TCDD in Sprague Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice.

    Darrell R. Boverhof;Lyle D. Burgoon;Colleen Tashiro;Bonnie Sharratt

  • CD36-Dependent 7-Ketocholesterol Accumulation in Macrophages Mediates Progression of Atherosclerosis in Response to Chronic Air Pollution Exposure

    Xiaoquan Rao;Jixin Zhong;Andrei Maiseyeu;Bhavani Gopalakrishnan

  • Nanotoxicology--a pathologist's perspective.

    Ann F. Hubbs;Robert R. Mercer;Stanley A. Benkovic;Jack Harkema

  • Comparative aspects of nasal airway anatomy: relevance to inhalation toxicology.

    Jack R. Harkema

  • Production of Interferon-γ by Influenza Hemagglutinin-Specific CD8 Effector T Cells Influences the Development of Pulmonary Immunopathology

    James A. Wiley;Adelheid Cerwenka;Jack R. Harkema;Richard W. Dutton

  • Epidemiological and Experimental Links between Air Pollution and Type 2 Diabetes

    Cuiqing Liu;Zhekang Ying;Jack Harkema;Qinghua Sun

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Pestka
James J. Pestka Michigan State University
Sanjay Rajagopalan
Sanjay Rajagopalan Case Western Reserve University
Robert D. Brook
Robert D. Brook University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gerald J. Keeler
Gerald J. Keeler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Timothy R. Zacharewski
Timothy R. Zacharewski Michigan State University
J. Timothy Dvonch
J. Timothy Dvonch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Norbert E. Kaminski
Norbert E. Kaminski Michigan State University
Andrij Holian
Andrij Holian University of Montana
David B. Peden
David B. Peden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joe L. Mauderly
Joe L. Mauderly Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to many healthcare and science professions. Online learning has made these fields more accessible than ever, offering flexible pathways for both newcomers and working professionals who want to advance or shift careers.

If you’re interested in fast-tracking your education, consider one of the many online biology programs. These programs allow you to study at your own pace and can quickly prepare you for entry-level lab or research roles.

Those aiming for direct patient care might explore the cma to lpn educational ladder. This pathway helps medical assistants become Licensed Practical Nurses, blending biology fundamentals with clinical skills.

For a broader healthcare foundation, an online asn program leads to a Registered Nurse (RN) license. This option is ideal for students who want a science-rich curriculum and immediate job prospects in healthcare.

Interested in how biology overlaps with wellness? Earning the best online nutrition degree can pave the way for careers in dietetics, health education, and public health.

Best Scientists Citing Jack R. Harkema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles