World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles T. Scialfa

Charles T. Scialfa

Charles T. Scialfa publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles T. Scialfa sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charles T. Scialfa D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles T. Scialfa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles T. Scialfa is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. The academic profile reflects involvement in research activities likely connected to their primary institution.

There is no detailed information available on the exact fields or subfields of study that characterize their research focus, nor on the main topics of their work. Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues to indicate specific collaborative networks or preferred journals and conferences.

No recent papers or notable publication titles are listed, which means there is limited accessible information on their specific scholarly contributions or the thematic areas explored in their academic output.

The profile does not include information about book publications or awards, which suggests that these aspects are either not part of their professional record or are not documented in the provided data.

The absence of data on recent citations or research impact metrics restricts further analysis of their scientific influence or outreach within the research community.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance

    Jeff K. Caird;Chelsea R. Willness;Piers Steel;Charles Scialfa

  • Visual Search for Traffic Signs: The Effects of Clutter, Luminance, and Aging

    Geoffrey Ho;Charles T. Scialfa;Jeff K. Caird;Trevor Graw

  • Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view.

    Charles T. Scialfa;Donald W. Kline;Brian J. Lyman

  • Age differences in estimating vehicle velocity.

    Charles T. Scialfa;Lawrence T. Guzy;Herschel W. Leibowitz;Philip M. Garvey

  • A hazard perception test for novice drivers

    Charles T. Scialfa;Micheline C. Deschênes;Jennifer D. Ference;Jessica Boone

  • Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity

    Charles T. Scialfa;Kenneth M. Joffe

  • Age Differences in Visual Search for Traffic Signs During a Simulated Conversation

    Lisa C. McPhee;Charles T. Scialfa;Wanda M. Dennis;Geoffrey Ho

  • Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis.

    Charles T. Scialfa;David M. Thomas;Kenneth M. Joffe

  • Adult Age Differences in the Time Course of Inhibition of Return

    Alan D. Castel;Alison L. Chasteen;Charles T. Scialfa;Jay Pratt

  • The role of sensory factors in cognitive aging research.

    Charles T. Scialfa

  • Age Differences in Search of Web Pages: The Effects of Link Size, Link Number, and Clutter:

    Michael Grahame;Jason C. Laberge;Charles T. Scialfa

  • Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system

    Geoffrey Ho;Dana Wheatley;Charles T. Scialfa

  • Does impaired executive functioning differentially impact verbal memory measures in older adults with suspected dementia

    Brian L. Brooks;Linda E. Weaver;Charles T. Scialfa

  • Age , Target - Distractor Similarity , and Visual Search

    Scialfa Ct;Esau Sp;Joffe Km

  • The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test.

    Charles T. Scialfa;David Borkenhagen;John Lyon;Micheline C. Deschênes

  • Age differences in feature and conjunction search: Implications for theories of visual search and generalized slowing

    Charles T. Scialfa;Kenneth M. Joffe

  • Effects of passenger and cellular phone conversations on driver distraction

    Jason Laberge;Jason Laberge;Charles (Chip) Scialfa;Cale White;Jeff Caird

  • Predictors of Web Navigation Performance in a Life Span Sample of Adults

    Jason C. Laberge;Charles T. Scialfa

  • Age, Skill Transfer, and Conjunction Search

    Geoffrey Ho;Charles T. Scialfa

  • Improving older drivers' hazard perception ability

    Mark S. Horswill;Cut Nurul Kemala;Mark Wetton;Charles T. Scialfa

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Herschel W. Leibowitz
Herschel W. Leibowitz Pennsylvania State University
Mark S. Horswill
Mark S. Horswill University of Queensland
Jay Pratt
Jay Pratt University of Toronto
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Alison L. Chasteen
Alison L. Chasteen University of Toronto
Alan D. Castel
Alan D. Castel University of California, Los Angeles
David E. Irwin
David E. Irwin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brian L. Brooks
Brian L. Brooks Alberta Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career opportunities in mental health. Many students aspire to become counselors and are looking for the fastest ways to enter the workforce. Online degree programs can offer the flexibility to balance studies with work or family responsibilities, making them an increasingly popular choice.

The shortest path to becoming a counselor in Oklahoma highlights how online and accelerated programs can help fast-track your career. Similarly, students interested in practicing in the northwest can learn about Oregon accelerated counseling programs designed to reduce time to graduation.

For East Coast residents, Pennsylvania fastest counseling programs and Rhode Island accelerated counseling programs offer similar options, blending online coursework and hands-on experience. Before enrolling, prospective students should compare program accreditation, state licensure requirements, and available career pathways in order to choose the best academic fit for their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Charles T. Scialfa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles