World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alison L. Chasteen

Alison L. Chasteen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6756
World Ranking
9431
National Ranking
640

Alison L. Chasteen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Chasteen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alison L. Chasteen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Chasteen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Alison L. Chasteen is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, whose work primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, including neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, health, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research explores several main topics, such as aging and gerontology, social and intergroup psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, health disparities and outcomes, cultural differences and values, as well as optimism, hope, and well-being.

Chasteen has contributed to various academic journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Among notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Chasteen are:

  • "Overlooked and Underestimated: Experiences of Ageism in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults" (2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
  • "Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity" (2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
  • "Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society's response say about us?" (2020, Age and Ageing)
  • "Ageism in the time of COVID-19" (2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • "Using Twitter to Examine Stigma Against People With Dementia During COVID-19: Infodemiology Study" (2022, JMIR Aging)

Chasteen collaborates frequently with other researchers, with a notable list of co-authors including:

  • Joel M. Le Forestier (10 co-authored publications)
  • Sarah Fraser (9 co-authored publications)
  • Juanita-Dawne Bacsu (8 co-authored publications)
  • Sherry Dahlke (8 co-authored publications)
  • Kathleen F. Hunter (8 co-authored publications)

In recognition of their contributions to the field of psychology, Alison L. Chasteen was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity.

    Liat Ayalon;Alison Chasteen;Manfred Diehl;Becca R. Levy

  • How Feelings of Stereotype Threat Influence Older Adults’ Memory Performance

    Alison L. Chasteen;Sudipa Bhattacharyya;Michelle Horhota;Raymond Tam

  • Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society’s response say about us?

    Unknown

  • Implementation Intentions and Facilitation of Prospective Memory

    Alison L. Chasteen;Denise C. Park;Norbert Schwarz

  • The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence

    Nadia Y. Bashir;Penelope Lockwood;Alison L. Chasteen;Daniel Nadolny

  • Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Kate Dupuis;M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Alison L Chasteen;Veronica Marchuk

  • Stereotypes as dominant responses: on the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts.

    Alan J. Lambert;B. Keith Payne;Larry L. Jacoby;Lara M. Shaffer

  • Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements.

    Jay Pratt;Alison L. Chasteen;Richard A. Abrams

  • The Ambivalent Ageism Scale: Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Benevolent and Hostile Ageism.

    Lindsey A. Cary;Alison L. Chasteen;Jessica Remedios

  • The Activation of Aging Stereotypes in Younger and Older Adults

    Alison L. Chasteen;Norbert Schwarz;Denise C. Park

  • Loyal Deviance: Testing the Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups

    Dominic J Packer;Alison L Chasteen

  • The moderating role of age-group identification and perceived threat on stereotype threat among older adults.

    Sonia K. Kang;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors

    Sonia K. Kang;Jacob B. Hirsh;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Thinking of God Moves Attention

    Alison L. Chasteen;Donna C. Burdzy;Jay Pratt

  • Age and regulatory focus determine preferences for health-related role models.

    Penelope Lockwood;Alison L. Chasteen;Carol Wong

  • Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice

    Sonia K. Kang;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Adult Age Differences in the Time Course of Inhibition of Return

    Alan D. Castel;Alison L. Chasteen;Charles T. Scialfa;Jay Pratt

  • Ageism in the time of COVID-19

    Hannah J Swift;Alison L Chasteen

  • Private vs Public Expressions of Racial Prejudice

    Alan J. Lambert;Stephanie Cronen;Alison L. Chasteen;Brian Lickel

  • Perceptions of Disadvantage Versus Conventionality: Political Values and Attitudes Toward the Elderly Versus Blacks

    Alan J. Lambert;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?

    Jessica D. Remedios;Alison L. Chasteen;Nicholas O. Rule;Jason E. Plaks

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Pratt
Jay Pratt University of Toronto
Alan J. Lambert
Alan J. Lambert Washington University in St. Louis
M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller University of Toronto
Richard A. Abrams
Richard A. Abrams Washington University in St. Louis
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas
Alan D. Castel
Alan D. Castel University of California, Los Angeles
Nicholas O. Rule
Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto
Liat Ayalon
Liat Ayalon Bar-Ilan University
Charles T. Scialfa
Charles T. Scialfa University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of career pathways and specialized degrees. One of the most impactful roles is working as a substance abuse counselor, a career that is growing in demand across the nation. Advancing in this field starts with understanding both educational requirements and local certification standards. Each state and city may have its own set of processes, from degree level to specific licensing exams.

For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Charlotte or want to know the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Chesapeake, you’ll find that requirements can vary by region. Major cities like Chicago have unique pathways for those curious about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chicago, while locations such as Chula Vista have their own state and local standards. Learn more about Chula Vista substance abuse counselor certification requirements to see how these pathways compare.

Exploring online psychology degrees can prepare you for these rewarding roles, offering both the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed to meet the varied demands of substance abuse counseling in today’s diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Alison L. Chasteen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles