World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alison L. Chasteen

Alison L. Chasteen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9431 8814 640 600 131 6756

Alison L. Chasteen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alison L. Chasteen between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alison L. Chasteen published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 27 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 8 publications
1994 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alison L. Chasteen: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 2
2005 4
2006 2
2007 2
2008 0
2009 3
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 9
2014 5
2015 7
2016 6
2017 3
2018 8
2019 7
2020 10
2021 14
2022 10
2023 20
2024 19
2025 8
Total 169
Download as CSV

Alison L. Chasteen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Chasteen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 131
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alison L. Chasteen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Chasteen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Alison L. Chasteen is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, whose work primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, including neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, health, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research explores several main topics, such as aging and gerontology, social and intergroup psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, health disparities and outcomes, cultural differences and values, as well as optimism, hope, and well-being.

Chasteen has contributed to various academic journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Among notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Chasteen are:

  • "Overlooked and Underestimated: Experiences of Ageism in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults" (2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
  • "Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity" (2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
  • "Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society's response say about us?" (2020, Age and Ageing)
  • "Ageism in the time of COVID-19" (2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • "Using Twitter to Examine Stigma Against People With Dementia During COVID-19: Infodemiology Study" (2022, JMIR Aging)

Chasteen collaborates frequently with other researchers, with a notable list of co-authors including:

  • Joel M. Le Forestier (10 co-authored publications)
  • Sarah Fraser (9 co-authored publications)
  • Juanita-Dawne Bacsu (8 co-authored publications)
  • Sherry Dahlke (8 co-authored publications)
  • Kathleen F. Hunter (8 co-authored publications)

In recognition of their contributions to the field of psychology, Alison L. Chasteen was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2021.

Best Publications

  • How Feelings of Stereotype Threat Influence Older Adults’ Memory Performance

    Alison L. Chasteen;Sudipa Bhattacharyya;Michelle Horhota;Raymond Tam

  • Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society’s response say about us?

    Unknown

  • Implementation Intentions and Facilitation of Prospective Memory

    Alison L. Chasteen;Denise C. Park;Norbert Schwarz

  • The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence

    Nadia Y. Bashir;Penelope Lockwood;Alison L. Chasteen;Daniel Nadolny

  • Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Kate Dupuis;M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Alison L Chasteen;Veronica Marchuk

  • Stereotypes as dominant responses: on the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts.

    Alan J. Lambert;B. Keith Payne;Larry L. Jacoby;Lara M. Shaffer

  • Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements.

    Jay Pratt;Alison L. Chasteen;Richard A. Abrams

  • The Ambivalent Ageism Scale: Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Benevolent and Hostile Ageism.

    Lindsey A. Cary;Alison L. Chasteen;Jessica Remedios

  • The Activation of Aging Stereotypes in Younger and Older Adults

    Alison L. Chasteen;Norbert Schwarz;Denise C. Park

  • Loyal Deviance: Testing the Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups

    Dominic J Packer;Alison L Chasteen

  • The moderating role of age-group identification and perceived threat on stereotype threat among older adults.

    Sonia K. Kang;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors

    Sonia K. Kang;Jacob B. Hirsh;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Thinking of God Moves Attention

    Alison L. Chasteen;Donna C. Burdzy;Jay Pratt

  • Age and regulatory focus determine preferences for health-related role models.

    Penelope Lockwood;Alison L. Chasteen;Carol Wong

  • Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice

    Sonia K. Kang;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Adult Age Differences in the Time Course of Inhibition of Return

    Alan D. Castel;Alison L. Chasteen;Charles T. Scialfa;Jay Pratt

  • Ageism in the time of COVID-19

    Hannah J Swift;Alison L Chasteen

  • Private vs Public Expressions of Racial Prejudice

    Alan J. Lambert;Stephanie Cronen;Alison L. Chasteen;Brian Lickel

  • Perceptions of Disadvantage Versus Conventionality: Political Values and Attitudes Toward the Elderly Versus Blacks

    Alan J. Lambert;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?

    Jessica D. Remedios;Alison L. Chasteen;Nicholas O. Rule;Jason E. Plaks

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Pratt
Jay Pratt University of Toronto
Alan J. Lambert
Alan J. Lambert Washington University in St. Louis
M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller University of Toronto
Richard A. Abrams
Richard A. Abrams Washington University in St. Louis
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas
Alan D. Castel
Alan D. Castel University of California, Los Angeles
Nicholas O. Rule
Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto
Liat Ayalon
Liat Ayalon Bar-Ilan University
Charles T. Scialfa
Charles T. Scialfa University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of career pathways and specialized degrees. One of the most impactful roles is working as a substance abuse counselor, a career that is growing in demand across the nation. Advancing in this field starts with understanding both educational requirements and local certification standards. Each state and city may have its own set of processes, from degree level to specific licensing exams.

For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Charlotte or want to know the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Chesapeake, you’ll find that requirements can vary by region. Major cities like Chicago have unique pathways for those curious about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chicago, while locations such as Chula Vista have their own state and local standards. Learn more about Chula Vista substance abuse counselor certification requirements to see how these pathways compare.

Exploring online psychology degrees can prepare you for these rewarding roles, offering both the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed to meet the varied demands of substance abuse counseling in today’s diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Alison L. Chasteen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles