World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3800
World Ranking
11204
National Ranking
5854

Alan J. Lambert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 61 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alan J. Lambert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons

    B.Keith Payne;Alan J Lambert;Larry L Jacoby

  • Stereotypes as dominant responses: on the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts.

    Alan J. Lambert;B. Keith Payne;Larry L. Jacoby;Lara M. Shaffer

  • Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: an integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion.

    Alan J. Lambert;Laura D. Scherer;John Paul Schott;Kristina R. Olson

  • Memory in mind and culture

    Pascal Boyer;James V. Wertsch

  • Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: revisiting the "affect-free" claim of terror management research.

    Alan J. Lambert;Fade R. Eadeh;Stephanie A. Peak;Laura D. Scherer

  • Toward a Greater Understanding of Antigay Prejudice: On the Role of Sexual Orientation and Gender Role Violation

    Keren Lehavot;Alan J. Lambert

  • Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes.

    Alan J. Lambert;Saera R. Khan;Brian A. Lickel;Katja Fricke

  • Perceptions of Risk and the Buffering Hypothesis: The Role of Just World Beliefs and Right-Wing Authoritarianism

    Alan J. Lambert;Thomas Burroughs;Tina Nguyen

  • The Role of Political Ideology in Mediating Judgments of Blame in Rape Victims and their Assailants: A Test of the Just World, Personal Responsibility, and Legitimization Hypotheses

    Alan J. Lambert;Katherine Raichle

  • Attitudes as accessibility bias: Dissociating automatic and controlled processes

    B. Keith Payne;Larry L. Jacoby;Alan J. Lambert

  • Private vs Public Expressions of Racial Prejudice

    Alan J. Lambert;Stephanie Cronen;Alison L. Chasteen;Brian Lickel

  • Perceptions of Disadvantage Versus Conventionality: Political Values and Attitudes Toward the Elderly Versus Blacks

    Alan J. Lambert;Alison L. Chasteen

  • Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts.

    Unknown

  • Stereotypes and social judgment: The consequences of group variability.

    Alan J. Lambert

  • Stereotypes and social judgment: the effects of typicality and group heterogeneity.

    Alan J. Lambert;Robert S. Wyer

  • Person memory and judgment: pragmatic influences on impressions formed in a social context.

    Robert S. Wyer;Thomas Lee Budesheim;Alan J. Lambert;Suzanne Swan

  • Contrast effects in priming paradigms: Implications for theory and research on implicit attitudes.

    Laura D. Scherer;Alan J. Lambert

  • On the predictive validity of implicit attitude measures: The moderating effect of perceived group variability ☆

    Alan J. Lambert;B. Keith Payne;Suzanne Ramsey;Lara M. Shaffer

  • Threat, Politics, and Attitudes: Toward a Greater Understanding of Rally-’Round-the-Flag Effects

    Alan J. Lambert;J. P. Schott;Laura Scherer

  • The self and social judgment: effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.

    Alan J. Lambert;Douglas H. Wedell

Frequent Co-Authors

B. Keith Payne
B. Keith Payne University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis
Alison L. Chasteen
Alison L. Chasteen University of Toronto
Robert S. Wyer
Robert S. Wyer University of Cincinnati
Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Kristina R. Olson
Kristina R. Olson University of Washington
Suzanne C. Swan
Suzanne C. Swan University of South Carolina
Victor Ottati
Victor Ottati Loyola University Chicago
Jeffrey M. Zacks
Jeffrey M. Zacks Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Lambert

Recently Published Articles