World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8399 7843 4484 4082 94 11165

Brian Lickel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian Lickel between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian Lickel published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 7 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2007. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1996 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian Lickel: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 3
2006 6
2007 8
2008 2
2009 1
2010 4
2011 3
2012 5
2013 4
2014 7
2015 4
2016 4
2017 5
2018 6
2019 7
2020 7
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 4
2025 3
Total 114
Download as CSV

Brian Lickel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Lickel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian Lickel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Lickel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian Lickel is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a strong focus on sociology and political science, social psychology, and gender studies. They have also contributed to political science and international relations and general health professions.

Their scholarly work covers several main topics, demonstrating breadth within social and intergroup psychology, climate change communication and perception, cultural differences and values, and psychological dimensions of moral and emotional judgment. Health psychology and well-being also feature in their research interests.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Ezra M. Markowitz
  • Andrea Mah
  • Hema Preya Selvanathan
  • Allecia E. Reid
  • Daniel Chapman

Lickel has published in various academic venues, notably:

  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Coping with climate change: Three insights for research, intervention, and communication to promote adaptive coping to climate change (2020), published in Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity-based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements (2020), published in European Journal of Social Psychology
  • How do conflict narratives shape conflict- and peace-related outcomes among majority group members? The role of competitive victimhood in intractable conflicts (2020), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Collective psychological ownership and the rise of reactionary counter-movements defending the status quo (2020), published in British Journal of Social Psychology
  • My Fight or Yours: Stereotypes of Activists From Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups (2021), published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Best Publications

  • Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.

    Brian Lickel;David L. Hamilton;Grazyna Wieczorkowska;Amy Lewis

  • Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment

    Michael W. Morris;Kwok Leung;Daniel Ames;Brian Lickel

  • Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others.

    Jim Blascovich;Wendy Berry Mendes;Sarah B. Hunter;Brian Lickel

  • Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.

    Unknown

  • Why Individuals Protest the Perceived Transgressions of Their Country: The Role of Anger, Shame, and Guilt

    Aarti Iyer;Toni Schmader;Brian Lickel

  • Vicarious Shame and Guilt

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;Mathew Curtis;Marchelle Scarnier

  • Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression

    Brian Lickel;Norman Miller;Douglas M. Stenstrom;Thomas F. Denson

  • Threatened by the unexpected: physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners.

    Wendy Berry Mendes;Jim Blascovich;Sarah B. Hunter;Brian Lickel

  • Challenge and Threat During Social Interactions With White and Black Men

    Wendy Berry Mendes;Jim Blascovich;Brian Lickel;Sarah B. Hunter

  • Elements of a Lay Theory of Groups: Types of Groups, Relational Styles, and the Perception of Group Entitativity

    Brian Lickel;David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • The Approach and Avoidance Function of Guilt and Shame Emotions: Comparing Reactions to Self-Caused and Other-Caused Wrongdoing

    Toni Schmader;Brian Lickel

  • Reassessing emotion in climate change communication

    Daniel A. Chapman;Brian Lickel;Ezra M. Markowitz

  • Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum.

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman;Brian Lickel

  • A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings?

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;David L. Hamilton

  • Shame and the motivation to change the self

    Brian Lickel;Kostadin Kushlev;Victoria Savalei;Shashi Matta

  • The Roles of Entitativity and Essentiality in Judgments of Collective Responsibility

    Thomas F. Denson;Brian Lickel;Mathew Curtis;Douglas M. Stenstrom

  • Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11

    Michael Johns;Toni Schmader;Brian Lickel

  • The effects of skin tone on race-related amygdala activity: an fMRI investigation

    Jaclyn Ronquillo;Thomas F. Denson;Brian Lickel;Zhong-Lin Lu

  • Challenge and Threat During Social Interactions With White and Black Men

    Unknown

  • Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: Evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska

    Marija Spanovic;Brian Lickel;Thomas F. Denson;Nebojsa Petrovic

  • Stigma, threat, and social interactions.

    Jim Blascovich;Wendy Berry Mendes;Sarah B. Hunter;Brian Lickel

  • Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes.

    Alan J. Lambert;Saera R. Khan;Brian A. Lickel;Katja Fricke

Frequent Co-Authors

Toni Schmader
Toni Schmader University of British Columbia
Thomas F. Denson
Thomas F. Denson University of New South Wales
David L. Hamilton
David L. Hamilton University of California, Santa Barbara
Wendy Berry Mendes
Wendy Berry Mendes University of California, San Francisco
Steven J. Sherman
Steven J. Sherman Indiana University
Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Norman Miller
Norman Miller University of Southern California
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Daniel R. Ames
Daniel R. Ames Columbia University
Alan J. Lambert
Alan J. Lambert Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue online programs in addiction studies, counseling, or mental health services, which provide the flexibility needed for busy professionals or those seeking career changes.

A popular career option is substance abuse counseling. Requirements for becoming a counselor can differ by location. For example, you can learn more about Huntsville substance abuse counselors education requirements or discover the qualifications for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Indianapolis. Both roles often require a bachelor’s degree at minimum, and sometimes specific certifications or supervised experience.

Some areas have additional or unique criteria. If you’re interested in the West Coast, find information on Irvine substance abuse counselor certification requirements. For Texas, look into how to become a substance abuse counselor in Irving.

With online psychology degrees and specialized certifications, graduates are well-positioned to make a meaningful impact in counseling, community outreach, social work, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Lickel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles