World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
9533
World Ranking
10345
National Ranking
5431

Daniel R. Ames publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel R. Ames sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel R. Ames D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel R. Ames sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel R. Ames is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research contributions span several areas within organizational behavior and marketing, with a focus on negotiation dynamics and decision-making processes in social and organizational contexts.

The scientist has published research in the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (2 publications)
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 publication)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1 publication)
  • Journal of Social and Political Psychology (1 publication)

Key papers authored or coauthored by Daniel R. Ames include:

  • "Who Negotiates and When? Individual Differences and Context Effects in Negotiation," 2021, Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Savvy or savage? How worldviews shape appraisals of antagonistic leaders," 2025, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "How Do We Manage Difficult Conversations?" 2024, Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "When sellers care about caretakers: Seller attachment shapes who gets to the bargaining table," 2025, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • "Changes in dangerous and competitive worldviews during the coronavirus epidemic: Evidence from a large-scale U.S. panel study," 2025, Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Einav Hart
  • Hannah Riley Bowles
  • Zhiying Ren
  • Christine Q Nguyen
  • Hillary Anger Elfenbein

The scientist's main subfields of study are:

  • Marketing
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Their work prominently addresses topics related to:

  • Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Family Business Performance and Succession

Best Publications

  • The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism

    Daniel R. Ames;Paul Rose;Cameron P. Anderson

  • Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment

    Michael W. Morris;Kwok Leung;Daniel Ames;Brian Lickel

  • Helping one's way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.

    Francis J. Flynn;Ray E. Reagans;Emily Tara Amanatullah;Daniel R. Ames

  • Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.

    Daniel R. Ames

  • Vicarious Shame and Guilt

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;Mathew Curtis;Marchelle Scarnier

  • What breaks a leader: the curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership.

    Daniel R. Ames;Francis J. Flynn

  • Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.

    Daniel R. Ames

  • Culturally Conferred Conceptions of Agency: A Key to Social Perception of Persons, Groups, and Other Actors

    Michael W. Morris;Tanya Menon;Daniel R. Ames

  • The Social Regulation of Emotion: An Integrative, Cross-Disciplinary Model

    Crystal Reeck;Daniel R. Ames;Kevin N. Ochsner

  • MIND-READING AND METACOGNITION: NARCISSISM, NOT ACTUAL COMPETENCE, PREDICTS SELF-ESTIMATED ABILITY

    Daniel R. Ames;Lara K. Kammrath

  • Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One's Status in a Group

    Cameron Anderson;Daniel R. Ames;Samuel D. Gosling

  • Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary

    Michael W. Morris;Oliver J. Sheldon;Daniel R. Ames;Maia J Young

  • It’s the Thought That Counts: On Perceiving How Helpers Decide to Lend a Hand

    Daniel R. Ames;Francis J. Flynn;Elke U. Weber

  • The Roles of Entitativity and Essentiality in Judgments of Collective Responsibility

    Thomas F. Denson;Brian Lickel;Mathew Curtis;Douglas M. Stenstrom

  • Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence

    Oliver J. Sheldon;David Dunning;Daniel R. Ames

  • Precise offers are potent anchors: Conciliatory counteroffers and attributions of knowledge in negotiations

    Malia F. Mason;Alice J. Lee;Elizabeth A. Wiley;Daniel R. Ames

  • I'll Know What You're Like When I See How You Feel How and When Affective Displays Influence Behavior-Based Impressions

    Daniel R. Ames;Gita V. Johar

  • Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping

    Daniel R. Ames;Elke U. Weber;Xi Zou

  • ‘How Do I Choose Thee? Let me Count the Ways’: A Textual Analysis of Similarities and Differences in Modes of Decision-making in China and the United States

    Elke U. Weber;Daniel R. Ames;Ann-Renée Blais

  • Call for transparency of COVID-19 models.

    C. Michael Barton;Marina Alberti;Daniel Ames;Jo An Atkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University
Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University
Eric D. Knowles
Eric D. Knowles New York University
Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Cameron Anderson
Cameron Anderson University of California, Berkeley
Joel Brockner
Joel Brockner Columbia University
Niall Bolger
Niall Bolger Columbia University
David Dunning
David Dunning University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Francis J. Flynn
Francis J. Flynn Stanford University
Alison Gopnik
Alison Gopnik University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study opens up a wide range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many universities across the United States offer accredited online programs in psychology, allowing students to pursue their degree from virtually anywhere while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you’re seeking inspiration for your academic journey, you might consider reviewing the best psychology program rankings in Virginia Beach or the top psychology programs in Waco. These resources highlight respected online and on-campus programs, faculty expertise, and innovative curriculum offerings.

For students aspiring to study in the nation’s capital, the best psychology degree rankings in Washington, D.C. outline leading educational options in both clinical and research-based tracks. Similarly, those interested in the Midwest can check the best psychology degree programs ranking in Wichita for guidance.

Graduates of online psychology programs can pursue diverse careers such as counseling, research, human resources, and social services. The flexibility and breadth of online psychology degrees continue to make them a popular and valuable choice for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel R. Ames

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles