World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5758
World Ranking
10443
National Ranking
5485

Eric D. Knowles publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric D. Knowles sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric D. Knowles D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric D. Knowles sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric D. Knowles is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans multiple subfields within the social sciences, with a primary focus on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main areas of study emphasize social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, racial and ethnic identity research, and the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional focal topics include the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, social and cultural dynamics, and mental health related to the pandemic.

Recent scholarly contributions by Eric D. Knowles include:

  • Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Social Class Predicts Emotion Perception and Perspective-Taking Performance in Adults, 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Political polarization and health, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Precarious Manhood Predicts Support for Aggressive Policies and Politicians, 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

They have frequently published in the following venues:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (4 publications)
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (3 publications)
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (2 publications)
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2 publications)
  • Nature Human Behaviour (1 publication)

Eric D. Knowles collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Pia Dietze (4 coauthored works)
  • Jay Joseph Van Bavel (3 coauthored works)
  • Shahrzad Goudarzi (3 coauthored works)
  • Sarah H. DiMuccio (3 coauthored works)
  • Anton Gollwitzer (2 coauthored works)

Their research covers diverse dimensions of social behavior and political psychology, contributing to understanding how group identities, social class, and political polarization influence health, emotions, and social cognition.

Best Publications

  • Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Anton Gollwitzer;Cameron Martel;William J. Brady;Philip Pärnamets;Philip Pärnamets

  • Deny, Distance, or Dismantle? How White Americans Manage a Privileged Identity

    Eric D. Knowles;Brian S. Lowery;Rosalind M. Chow;Miguel M. Unzueta

  • On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness.

    Eric D. Knowles;Brian S. Lowery;Caitlin M. Hogan;Rosalind M. Chow

  • Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action.

    Brian S. Lowery;Miguel M. Unzueta;Eric D. Knowles;Phillip Atiba Goff

  • Implicit motivation to control prejudice.

    Jack Glaser;Eric D. Knowles

  • Framing Inequity Safely: Whites' Motivated Perceptions of Racial Privilege

    Brian S. Lowery;Eric D. Knowles;Miguel M. Unzueta

  • White selves: conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity.

    Eric D. Knowles;Kaiping Peng

  • False memories of fabricated political events

    Steven J. Frenda;Eric D. Knowles;William Saletan;Elizabeth F. Loftus

  • Social Class and the Motivational Relevance of Other Human Beings: Evidence From Visual Attention.

    Pia Dietze;Eric D. Knowles

  • Meritocracy, Self-Concerns, and Whites' Denial of Racial Inequity

    Eric D. Knowles;Brian S. Lowery

  • Culture, Education, and the Attribution of Physical Causality

    Kaiping Peng;Eric D. Knowles

  • Racial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan

    Eric D. Knowles;Brian S. Lowery;Rebecca L. Schaumberg

  • Culture and the Process of Person Perception: Evidence for Automaticity among East Asians in Correcting for Situational Influences on Behavior

    Eric D. Knowles;Michael W. Morris;Chi Yue Chiu;Ying Yi Hong

  • Paying for Positive Group Esteem: How Inequity Frames Affect Whites' Responses to Redistributive Policies

    Brian S. Lowery;Rosalind M. Chow;Eric D. Knowles;Miguel M. Unzueta

  • The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support: Evidence for Threat, Identity, and Contact Effects in the 2016 Presidential Election

    Eric D. Knowles;Linda R. Tropp

  • iMPlicit Motivation to control PreJudice Moderates the effect of cognitive dePletion on unintended discriMination

    Sang Hee Park;Jack Glaser;Eric D. Knowles

  • Diversity Is What You Want It to Be How Social-Dominance Motives Affect Construals of Diversity

    Miguel M. Unzueta;Eric D. Knowles;Geoffrey C. Ho

  • Fundamental(ist) Attribution Error: Protestants Are Dispositionally Focused

    Yexin Jessica Li;Kathryn A. Johnson;Adam B. Cohen;Melissa J. Williams

  • Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality.

    Shahrzad Goudarzi;Ruthie Pliskin;John T. Jost;Eric D. Knowles

  • How believing in affirmative action quotas protects White men's self-esteem

    Miguel M. Unzueta;Brian S. Lowery;Eric D. Knowles

  • Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices.

    Daniel A. Effron;Eric D. Knowles

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Alison Gopnik
Alison Gopnik University of California, Berkeley
Daniel R. Ames
Daniel R. Ames Columbia University
Kaiping Peng
Kaiping Peng Tsinghua University
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Ying-yi Hong
Ying-yi Hong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chuansheng Chen
Chuansheng Chen University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. One of the most in-demand options is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role that requires a unique blend of education and certification depending on your location.

Each state and city set their own training standards. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Minneapolis focus on a combination of education, supervised work experience, and licensing exams. Similarly, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Nashville, you’ll need specific academic coursework and state-approved internships.

Requirements can also differ in other cities. New Orleans substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize ongoing professional development, while New York City substance abuse counselor certification requirements outline specific credentialing processes and exams necessary for practice.

By pursuing an online psychology degree, you can prepare for these diverse roles with the flexibility to meet your state’s specific requirements and advance your career in this critical field.

Best Scientists Citing Eric D. Knowles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles