World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
9585
World Ranking
5922
National Ranking
12

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
10810
World Ranking
5297
National Ranking
23

Rhodri Cusack publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhodri Cusack sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rhodri Cusack D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhodri Cusack sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rhodri Cusack is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work addresses various main topics, notably including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Child and Animal Learning Development, Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Recent publications by Rhodri Cusack include:

  • "Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference" (2020) in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences" (2020) in Nature Communications
  • "Age-related reduction in motor adaptation: brain structural correlates and the role of explicit memory" (2020) in Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Consciousness in the cradle: on the emergence of infant experience" (2023) in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Lessons from infant learning for unsupervised machine learning" (2022) in Nature Machine Intelligence

Co-authors frequently publishing with Rhodri Cusack are:

  • Lorijn Zaadnoordijk
  • Kamen A. Tsvetanov
  • James B. Rowe
  • Lorina Naçi
  • Rogier Kievit

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Brain Communications
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample.

    Jason R. Taylor;Nitin Williams;Rhodri Cusack;Tibor Auer

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing

    Meredith A Shafto;Lorraine K Tyler;Marie Dixon;Jason R Taylor;Jason R Taylor

  • Listening to Your Heart How Interoception Shapes Emotion Experience and Intuitive Decision Making

    Barnaby D. Dunn;Hannah C. Galton;Ruth Morgan;Davy Evans

  • Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

    Robert P. Carlyon;Rhodri Cusack;Jessica M. Foxton;Ian H. Robertson

  • Top-Down Activation of Shape-Specific Population Codes in Visual Cortex during Mental Imagery

    Mark Stokes;Russell Thompson;Rhodri Cusack;John Duncan

  • Effects of Location, Frequency Region, and Time Course of Selective Attention on Auditory Scene Analysis

    Rhodri Cusack;John Deeks;Genevieve Aikman;Robert P Carlyon

  • New robust 3-D phase unwrapping algorithms: application to magnetic field mapping and undistorting echoplanar images.

    Rhodri Cusack;N. Papadakis

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Using the talairach atlas with the MNI template

    Matthew Brett;Kalina Christoff;Rhodri Cusack;Jack Lancaster

  • The Intraparietal Sulcus and Perceptual Organization

    Rhodri Cusack

  • Attentional Functions of Parietal and Frontal Cortex

    Polly V. Peers;Casimir J.H. Ludwig;Chris Rorden;Rhodri Cusack

  • An Evaluation of the Use of Magnetic Field Maps to Undistort Echo-Planar Images

    Rhodri Cusack;Matthew Brett;Katja Osswald

  • Fluid intelligence loss linked to restricted regions of damage within frontal and parietal cortex

    Alexandra Woolgar;Alice Parr;Rhodri Cusack;Russell Thompson

  • A common neural code for similar conscious experiences in different individuals.

    Lorina Naci;Rhodri Cusack;Mimma Anello;Adrian M. Owen

  • Adjusting for global effects in voxel-based morphometry: Gray matter decline in normal aging

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Rhodri Cusack;Richard N.A. Henson

  • How does an fMRI voxel sample the neuronal activity pattern: compact-kernel or complex spatiotemporal filter?

    Nikolaus Kriegeskorte;Rhodri Cusack;Peter A. Bandettini

  • Distinct aspects of frontal lobe structure mediate age-related differences in fluid intelligence and multitasking

    Rogier A Kievit;Simon W Davis;Daniel J Mitchell;Jason R Taylor

  • Automatic analysis (aa): efficient neuroimaging workflows and parallel processing using Matlab and XML

    Rhodri Cusack;Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky;Daniel J. Mitchell;Conor James Wild

  • Flexible, Capacity-Limited Activity of Posterior Parietal Cortex in Perceptual as well as Visual Short-Term Memory Tasks

    Daniel J. Mitchell;Rhodri Cusack

  • Categorical and dimensional reports of experienced affect to emotion-inducing pictures in depression.

    Barnaby D. Dunn;Tim Dalgleish;Andrew D. Lawrence;Rhodri Cusack

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Carlyon
Robert P. Carlyon University of Cambridge
John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Jonathan M. Huntley
Jonathan M. Huntley Loughborough University
Morgan D. Barense
Morgan D. Barense University of Toronto
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a wide range of career pathways, many of which can be pursued or advanced with online degrees. If you are interested in applying your knowledge of the brain and behavior within a therapeutic or clinical setting, there are several flexible, affordable online options to consider.

For those passionate about mental health support, the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling programs provide strong foundational training in counseling techniques and client care. Similarly, students seeking broad expertise should explore an affordable master's in counseling online, which prepares graduates for diverse counseling roles.

For a more specialized focus, the best online mft programs are ideal for those aiming to work with couples or families. Those interested in research, psychology, or academic careers may benefit from an affordable online masters in psychology.

Each of these online degree options allows you to build on your neuroscience background while opening doors to rewarding, people-centered careers in mental health and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Rhodri Cusack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles