World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
12553
World Ranking
11979
National Ranking
922

Paul D. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 201 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul D. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul D. Smith is affiliated with AstraZeneca in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research spans several interconnected subfields, including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Organic Chemistry, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a diverse range of topics, with notable concentration in Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Service and Product Innovation, and Digital Marketing and Social Media.

Paul D. Smith has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications. Some of the recent papers include:

  • "Evaluation and optimization of ICOS atmosphere station data as part of the labeling process," 2021, published in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Teach well, learn better - Customer involvement and new product performance in B2B markets: The role of desorptive and absorptive capacity," 2022, published in Industrial Marketing Management
  • "Megacity and local contributions to regional air pollution: an aircraft case study over London," 2020, published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Diversity of movement patterns of Longnose Gar tracked in coastal waters of western Lake Ontario," 2023, published in Environmental Biology of Fishes
  • "Fragmentation in Collisions of Snow with Graupel/Hail: New Formulation from Field Observations," 2024, published in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Their frequent collaborators include Claudio Mendicute-Fierro, Mark E. Light, Camille Yver Kwok, Carole Philippon, and P. Bergamaschi. These collaborations suggest active engagement across multiple research groups and disciplines.

Paul D. Smith's work has appeared often in prominent scientific journals and venues. Key publication venues include Cancer Research, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Industrial Marketing Management, Environmental Biology of Fishes, and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Cancer Research stands out as a recurring journal for their contributions.

Best Publications

  • DRAM, a p53-Induced Modulator of Autophagy, Is Critical for Apoptosis

    Diane Crighton;Simon Wilkinson;Jim O'Prey;Nelofer Syed

  • Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study

    Pasi A Jänne;Alice T Shaw;José Rodrigues Pereira;Gaëlle Jeannin

  • Gene Expression Profiling of Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma with cDNA Microarrays

    Javed Khan;Richard Simon;Michael Bittner;Yidong Chen

  • AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models

    Barry R. Davies;Armelle Logie;Jennifer S. McKay;Paul Martin

  • MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors and cancer therapy: the long and winding road.

    Christopher J. Caunt;Matthew J. Sale;Paul D. Smith;Simon J. Cook

  • Selumetinib Plus Docetaxel Compared With Docetaxel Alone and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With KRAS-Mutant Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The SELECT-1 Randomized Clinical Trial

    Pasi A. Jänne;Michel M. van den Heuvel;Fabrice Barlesi;Manuel Cobo

  • Activity of the Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 inhibitor AZD3965 in Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Radosław Polański;Cassandra L Hodgkinson;Alberto Fusi;Daisuke Nonaka

  • iASPP preferentially binds p53 proline-rich region and modulates apoptotic function of codon 72-polymorphic p53.

    Daniele Bergamaschi;Yardena Samuels;Yardena Samuels;Yardena Samuels;Alexandra Sullivan;Marketa Zvelebil

  • Acquired Resistance to the Mutant-Selective EGFR Inhibitor AZD9291 Is Associated with Increased Dependence on RAS Signaling in Preclinical Models

    Catherine A. Eberlein;Daniel Stetson;Aleksandra A. Markovets;Katherine J. Al-Kadhimi

  • The first-in-human study of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-sulfate) capsule of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): a phase I open-label multicenter trial in patients with advanced cancer.

    Udai Banerji;D. Ross Camidge;Henk M. W. Verheul;Roshan Agarwal

  • Basal and Treatment-Induced Activation of AKT Mediates Resistance to Cell Death by AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in Braf-Mutant Human Cutaneous Melanoma Cells

    Y.N. Vashisht Gopal;Wanleng Deng;Scott E. Woodman;Kakajan Komurov

  • Transcriptional pathway signatures predict MEK addiction and response to selumetinib (AZD6244)

    Jonathan R. Dry;Sandra Pavey;Sandra Pavey;Christine A. Pratilas;Chris Harbron

  • Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Drug Resistance.

    Richard A Ward;Stephen Fawell;Nicolas Floc'h;Vikki Flemington

  • Two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncoproteins cooperate to repress expression of the proapoptotic tumour-suppressor Bim: clues to the pathogenesis of Burkitt's lymphoma.

    E Anderton;J Yee;P Smith;T Crook

  • Amplification of the Driving Oncogene, KRAS or BRAF, Underpins Acquired Resistance to MEK1/2 Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer Cells

    Annette S. Little;Kathryn Balmanno;Matthew J. Sale;Scott Newman

  • p53 mutation with frequent novel codons but not a mutator phenotype in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast tumours

    Tim Crook;Louise A Brooks;Susan Crossland;P Osin

  • Real time in vivo non-invasive optical imaging using near-infrared fluorescent quantum dots.

    Nicole Y. Morgan;Sean English;Wei Chen;Victor Chernomordik

  • The prolyl isomerase Pin1 orchestrates p53 acetylation and dissociation from the apoptosis inhibitor iASPP

    Fiamma Mantovani;Francesca Tocco;Javier Girardini;Paul Smith

  • Translating the Therapeutic Potential of AZD4547 in FGFR1-Amplified Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer through the Use of Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft Models

    Jingchuan Zhang;Lin Zhang;Xinying Su;Ming Li

  • Epstein-barr virus latency in B cells leads to epigenetic repression and CpG methylation of the tumour suppressor gene Bim.

    Kostas Paschos;Paul Smith;Emma Anderton;Jaap M. Middeldorp

Frequent Co-Authors

Harvey I. Pass
Harvey I. Pass New York University
Thomas F. DeLaney
Thomas F. DeLaney Harvard University
Pasi A. Jänne
Pasi A. Jänne Harvard University
Simon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook Babraham Institute
Martin O. Leach
Martin O. Leach Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Eileen M. Lafer
Eileen M. Lafer The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Ignacio I. Wistuba
Ignacio I. Wistuba The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Roy S. Herbst
Roy S. Herbst Yale University
Simon T. Barry
Simon T. Barry AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a wide range of diverse career and educational opportunities. Many students leverage their science background to pursue specialized health and life science roles. For those interested in nutrition, dietitian masters programs can prepare graduates for rewarding careers as registered dietitians or nutrition specialists.

If you’re seeking entry into the healthcare field, there are flexible online medical assistant programs with financial aid designed to make training accessible and affordable, even for those balancing work or family.

Medical assistants can further advance their careers with a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online, offering a pathway toward higher qualifications and expanded responsibilities in patient care.

For students who want to deepen their science foundation or transition into lab research, an online biology degree provides a flexible, fast-track option for earning credentials and advancing in the field. Each of these pathways supports a dynamic science career in today’s evolving healthcare and research landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Paul D. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles