World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
8933
World Ranking
18669
National Ranking
1456

Martin J. Allday publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Allday sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 84 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin J. Allday D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Allday sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Allday is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their work is connected to this institution, reflecting an involvement in the academic environment of one of the leading research universities.

There is no available data regarding recent papers authored by Martin J. Allday or frequent coauthors linked with their research. Similarly, details about the venues where they regularly publish are not provided, nor are there records of book publications associated with their name.

Information about the main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics covered by Martin J. Allday is also not available. Additionally, there is no record of awards won or distinctions received by this researcher documented in the data provided.

Best Publications

  • A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour

    Maria Carmen Marin;Christine A. Jost;Louise A. Brooks;Meredith S. Irwin

  • The curious case of the tumour virus: 50 years of Burkitt's lymphoma

    David A. Thorley-Lawson;Martin J. Allday

  • A degradation signal located in the C‐terminus of p21WAF1/CIP1 is a binding site for the C8 α‐subunit of the 20S proteasome

    Robert Touitou;Jo Richardson;Suchira Bose;Makoto Nakanishi

  • EBV gene expression in an NPC-related tumour.

    M.M. Hitt;M.J. Allday;T. Hara;L. Karran

  • MDM2 Promotes Proteasome-Dependent Ubiquitin-Independent Degradation of Retinoblastoma Protein

    Patima Sdek;Haoqiang Ying;Donny L.F. Chang;Wei Qiu

  • Genome Diversity of Epstein-Barr Virus from Multiple Tumor Types and Normal Infection

    Anne L. Palser;Nicholas E. Grayson;Robert E. White;Craig Corton

  • Epigenetic reprogramming of host genes in viral and microbial pathogenesis

    Konstantinos Paschos;Martin J. Allday

  • High level expression of ΔN-p63: a mechanism for the inactivation of p53 in undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)?

    Tim Crook;John M Nicholls;Louise Brooks;Jenny O'Nions

  • An ATM/Chk2-Mediated DNA Damage-Responsive Signaling Pathway Suppresses Epstein-Barr Virus Transformation of Primary Human B Cells

    Pavel A. Nikitin;Christopher M. Yan;Eleonora Forte;Alessio Bocedi

  • Two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncoproteins cooperate to repress expression of the proapoptotic tumour-suppressor Bim: clues to the pathogenesis of Burkitt's lymphoma.

    E Anderton;J Yee;P Smith;T Crook

  • Immunohistology of Epstein-Barr virus-associated antigens in B cell disorders from immunocompromised individuals.

    J. Thomas;Neil Hotchin;Martin Allday;Peter Amlot

  • p53 mutation with frequent novel codons but not a mutator phenotype in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast tumours

    Tim Crook;Louise A Brooks;Susan Crossland;P Osin

  • Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 3C Interacts with Histone Deacetylase To Repress Transcription

    Stoyan A Radkov;Robert Touitou;Alex Brehm;Martin Rowe

  • Epstein-barr virus latency in B cells leads to epigenetic repression and CpG methylation of the tumour suppressor gene Bim.

    Kostas Paschos;Paul Smith;Emma Anderton;Jaap M. Middeldorp

  • Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen (EBNA)3C is an immortalizing oncoprotein with similar properties to adenovirus E1A and papillomavirus E7.

    G A Parker;T Crook;M Bain;E A Sara

  • EBNA3B-deficient EBV promotes B cell lymphomagenesis in humanized mice and is found in human tumors

    Robert E. White;Patrick C. Rämer;Kikkeri N. Naresh;Sonja Meixlsperger

  • Epigenetic Repression of p16INK4A by Latent Epstein-Barr Virus Requires the Interaction of EBNA3A and EBNA3C with CtBP

    Lenka Skalska;Robert E. White;Melanie Franz;Michaela Ruhmann

  • Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression during the initiation of B cell immortalization.

    M. J. Allday;D. H. Crawford;B. E. Griffin

  • Interaction of MEQ protein and C-terminal-binding protein is critical for induction of lymphomas by Marek's disease virus

    Andrew C. Brown;Susan J. Baigent;Lorraine P. Smith;Jason P. Chattoo

  • Transcriptional silencing of Polo-like kinase 2 (SNK/PLK2) is a frequent event in B-cell malignancies.

    Nelofer Syed;Paul Smith;Alexandra Sullivan;Lindsay C Spender

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Farrell
Paul J. Farrell Imperial College London
Paul D. Smith
Paul D. Smith AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Beverly E. Griffin
Beverly E. Griffin Imperial College London
Venugopal Nair
Venugopal Nair The Pirbright Institute
Christian Münz
Christian Münz University of Zurich
Jaap M. Middeldorp
Jaap M. Middeldorp VU University Medical Center
David A. Thorley-Lawson
David A. Thorley-Lawson Tufts University
Anthony Letai
Anthony Letai Harvard University
Paul Kellam
Paul Kellam Imperial College London
Gerald Niedobitek
Gerald Niedobitek University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of health and science careers. Many students consider specialized online degrees that build on their foundational knowledge. Fields like diagnostic imaging, nutrition, and healthcare support continue to expand, offering both flexibility and strong job prospects.

For those interested in medical imaging, you can explore ultrasound tech programs online to enter this rapidly growing field. Similarly, online rad tech programs provide another pathway into healthcare, combining science with patient care.

Nutrition is another rewarding area. If you want to help people lead healthier lives, registered dietitian masters programs offer advanced training that can lead to clinical and community roles.

Aspiring to support healthcare teams more directly? Consider online medical assistant programs with financial aid, which allow you to start working in healthcare settings quickly and efficiently.

Exploring these related online programs can help you leverage your science background and find a career path tailored to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Allday

Trending Scientists