World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8047 7511 4307 3919 95 13480

Francis J. Flynn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francis J. Flynn between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francis J. Flynn published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 3 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francis J. Flynn: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 0
2003 10
2004 7
2005 3
2006 6
2007 3
2008 5
2009 2
2010 7
2011 8
2012 11
2013 7
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 5
2018 0
2019 1
2020 2
2021 3
2022 3
2023 2
2024 3
2025 2
2026 1
Total 105
Download as CSV

Francis J. Flynn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis J. Flynn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Francis J. Flynn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis J. Flynn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francis J. Flynn is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology, with significant contributions to sociology and political science, social psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management. The scientist's work also overlaps with cognitive neuroscience and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The main topics covered in Flynn's research include job satisfaction and organizational behavior, social and intergroup psychology, emotions and moral behavior, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, emotional intelligence and performance, opinion dynamics and social influence, and the intersection of COVID-19 and mental health.

Flynn has published articles in several notable academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • American Psychologist
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Selected recent papers by Flynn include:

  • "Better to give than reciprocate? Status and reciprocity in prosocial exchange." (2021), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Communication Miscalibration: The Price Leaders Pay for Not Sharing Enough" (2022), Academy of Management Journal

Flynn has collaborated with several researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Shilaan Alzahawi
  • Kevin M. Kniffin
  • Jayanth Narayanan
  • Frederik Anseel
  • John Antonakis

Their publications contribute to a better understanding of complex social dynamics in workplace settings, focusing on emotional regulation, social expectations, communication, and prosocial behavior. This work addresses both theoretical and practical aspects of organizational behavior and social psychology, particularly within the context of contemporary challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams

    Jennifer A. Chatman;Francis J. Flynn

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Helping one's way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.

    Francis J. Flynn;Ray E. Reagans;Emily Tara Amanatullah;Daniel R. Ames

  • Identity Orientations And Forms Of Social Exchange In Organizations

    Unknown

  • What breaks a leader: the curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership.

    Daniel R. Ames;Francis J. Flynn

  • Are Two Narcissists Better Than One? The Link Between Narcissism, Perceived Creativity, and Creative Performance

    Unknown

  • Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence.

    Cameron Anderson;Sandra E. Spataro;Francis J. Flynn

  • Having an open mind: the impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation.

    Unknown

  • Getting to Know You: The Influence of Personality on Impressions and Performance of Demographically Different People in Organizations

    Francis J. Flynn;Jennifer A. Chatman;Sandra E. Spataro

  • If you need help, just ask: underestimating compliance with direct requests for help.

    Unknown

  • It’s the Thought That Counts: On Perceiving How Helpers Decide to Lend a Hand

    Daniel R. Ames;Francis J. Flynn;Elke U. Weber

  • Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation

    Unknown

  • Who's with Me? False Consensus, Brokerage, and Ethical Decision Making in Organizations

    Francis J. Flynn;Scott S. Wiltermuth

  • Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange

    Francesca Gino;Francis J. Flynn

  • “Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking

    Vanessa K. Bohns;Francis J. Flynn

  • Structure, Identity, and Solidarity: A Comparative Field Study of Generalized and Direct Exchange

    Robb Willer;Francis J. Flynn;Sonya Zak

  • Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit?

    Unknown

  • It's different to give than to receive: predictors of givers' and receivers' reactions to favor exchange.

    Francis J. Flynn;Joel Brockner

  • Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace

    Unknown

  • Do you two know each other? Transitivity, homophily, and the need for (network) closure.

    Francis J. Flynn;Ray E. Reagans;Lucia Guillory

  • When feeling bad leads to feeling good: guilt-proneness and affective organizational commitment.

    Francis J. Flynn;Rebecca L. Schaumberg

  • What's good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: the benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts.

    Francis J. Flynn;Daniel R. Ames

  • Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown: the link between guilt proneness and leadership.

    Rebecca L. Schaumberg;Francis J. Flynn

  • Guilt by Design: Structuring Organizations to Elicit Guilt as an Affective Reaction to Failure

    Vanessa K. Bohns;Francis J. Flynn

  • Psyched Up or Psyched Out? The Influence of Coactor Status on Individual Performance

    Francis J. Flynn;Emily T. Amanatullah

  • Self-reliance: A Gender Perspective on its Relationship to Communality and Leadership Evaluations

    Rebecca L. Schaumberg;Francis J. Flynn

  • Clarifying the link between job satisfaction and absenteeism: The role of guilt proneness.

    Rebecca L. Schaumberg;Francis J. Flynn

  • Once Bitten, Twice Shy: The Effect of a Past Refusal on Expectations of Future Compliance

    Daniel A. Newark;Francis J. Flynn;Vanessa K. Bohns

  • 9 The Case for Behavioral Decision Research in Organizational Behavior

    Don A. Moore;Francis J. Flynn

  • The Gifts We Keep on Giving Documenting and Destigmatizing the Regifting Taboo

    Gabrielle S. Adams;Francis J. Flynn;Michael Irwin Norton

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Ames
Daniel R. Ames Columbia University
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology
Brett Q. Ford
Brett Q. Ford University of Toronto
Cort W. Rudolph
Cort W. Rudolph Wayne State University
Peter Bamberger
Peter Bamberger Tel Aviv University
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jason D. Shaw
Jason D. Shaw Nanyang Technological University
Gary Johns
Gary Johns Concordia University
Connie R. Wanberg
Connie R. Wanberg University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens diverse options for online education and career advancement in the USA. Many students are seeking flexible pathways to become counselors, a popular route for those passionate about helping others. Accelerated programs and specialized tracks can help you achieve your goals more quickly, depending on your location and interests.

For those seeking region-specific solutions, Montana accelerated counseling programs and the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Nebraska both offer strategies to complete licensure requirements efficiently. Similarly, students may want to explore the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Nevada or the New Hampshire fastest counseling programs. These resources detail state-specific steps, educational prerequisites, and online degree options tailored to each region.

Choosing the right online degree means considering program length, state licensure requirements, and your career ambitions. Whether you aim to become a licensed counselor or explore other psychology-related fields, understanding your options can help you make informed decisions and start your career sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Francis J. Flynn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles